License Revocation Records in Japan
Browse Japanese administrative enforcement records classified as License Revocation. Each record includes the company, governing law, issuing authority, penalty amount when available, and a link to the original Japanese government disclosure.
Useful for long-tail searches such as "License Revocation Japan company", "Japanese administrative license revocation", and "Japan regulatory sanctions by action type".
532 Japanese enforcement records
Japanese version| Date | Company | Law | Action | Penalty | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 株式会社都木材緑化 当該建設業者の役員が、刑法第204条の罪により、罰金刑に処せられ、令和5年7月11日に刑の執行が終了してから5年を経過しておらず(建設業法第8条第12号及び第8号)、建設業法第29条第1項第2号に該当する。 | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Apr 30, 2026 | K.K. Zieipuranningu 株式会社ジェイプランニング 株式会社ジェイプランニングの営業所の所在地を確知することができないため、令和8年3月27日付け静岡県公報第710号でその旨を公告したが、当該公告の日から30日を経過しても同社から申出がなかった。 | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Apr 25, 2026 | K.K. Mukaitizong Jian 株式会社ムカイチ総建 当該建設業者の取締役が、刑法(明治40年法律第45号)第208条の罪により、罰金15万円の刑に処せられ、令和4年1月12日にその刑が確定した。 | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Apr 23, 2026 | 横浜建設株式会社 当該建設業者の営業所の所在地が確知できないため、令和8年3月11日大阪府告示第368号によりその事実を公告したが、当該公告の日から30日を経過しても当該建設業者から申出がなかった。 | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Apr 21, 2026 | K.K. PEACE 株式会社PEACE Because the location of the construction company's office could not be confirmed, it was announced in the Kagoshima Prefecture Public Notice on March 17, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days of the announcement. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kagoshima Prefecture |
| Mar 28, 2026 | 双栄建設株式会社 The director of the construction company was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on November 28, 2025. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 18, 2026 | 日成建設株式会社 The construction company failed to meet the standards for a specified office technician as stipulated in Article 15, Paragraph 2 of the Building Business Act, as the individual was not a full-time employee dedicated solely to duties. Additionally, the company submitted false information in permit applications under Articles 5 and 6 of the Building Business Act, claiming that the individual was a specified office technician and was not receiving salary from the company, despite not being a full-time employee. The company also filed a notification that it had abolished all permits for specified construction businesses, which is a violation of Article 12, Item 5 of the Building Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 18, 2026 | 有限会社松田工業 The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 200,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on December 24, 2025. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 13, 2026 | K.K. Uotasisutemu 株式会社ウォーターシステム The representative director of Water System Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine under the Penal Code, and the execution of the sentence was completed on August 14, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hyogo Prefecture |
| Mar 12, 2026 | 株式会社相羽建設 Aiba Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Shizuoka District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 2, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Mar 3, 2026 | 有限会社草刈工務店 The officer of Kusakari Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to imprisonment or a more severe penalty on September 5, 2025, and it was found that less than five years have passed since the completion of the sentence or the person no longer being subject to the sentence. This corresponds to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the law. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Miyagi Prefecture |
| Mar 3, 2026 | YKS K.K. YKS株式会社 Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 682 on January 23, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Feb 27, 2026 | (株)国定電機 The representative director of Kunitada Denki Co., Ltd. submitted false qualification certificates during the construction business license application, claiming to possess the necessary qualifications for a designated technical engineer as required by the Building Business Act. Despite not having the qualifications, they presented certificates including a first-class architectural construction management engineer certificate and a first-class architect license, and obtained the license on November 6, 2015, through fraudulent means. The license was also renewed on November 6, 2020, under the same false pretenses. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Gunma Prefecture |
| Feb 26, 2026 | K.K. Sumaihuruhomu (株)スマイフルホーム It was found that the former director of Smileful Home Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on October 11, 2024. This corresponds to Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Nagasaki Prefecture |
| Feb 26, 2026 | Borukano K.K. ボルカノ株式会社 The director of the construction company was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on June 11, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Feb 20, 2026 | Eiaru K.K. エイアール株式会社 The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for a violation of Article 235 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on June 26, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Feb 20, 2026 | 株式会社有明建設 The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on November 9, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Feb 19, 2026 | 有限会社関組 Because the location of the office of Yugen Kaisha Sekigumi could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 690 dated January 16, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Feb 12, 2026 | 有限会社新名緑化 The representative director of Shinmei Greenery Co., Ltd. was sentenced on November 17, 2025, to one year in prison with a three-year suspension for obstructing a public contract auction bid, and the sentence was finalized on December 2, 2025. As a result, they fall under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act. This also corresponds to Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Oita Prefecture |
| Feb 12, 2026 | 鈴木住宅設備 Because the location of Suzuki Housing Equipment's sales office could not be determined, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 688 dated January 9, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Feb 8, 2026 | K.K. Wandauoru 株式会社ワンダーウォール The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 70,000 yen for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), with the sentence finalized on March 24, 2023. Additionally, the construction company submitted false information in the permit application under Article 5 of the Construction Business Act and in documents under Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the same law, and received an update of the permit under Article 3, Paragraph 3 of the Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Feb 3, 2026 | 有限会社鶴岡渡部工務店 The representative director of Tsuruoka Watabe Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment under Article 25, Paragraph 1, Item 14 of the Act on Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning (Act No. 137 of 1970), with the sentence finalized on December 26, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Yamagata Prefecture |
| Feb 3, 2026 | K.K. PRESI 株式会社PRESI The representative director of PRESI Co., Ltd. was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension on December 21, 2023, by the Fukui District Court for violations of the Stimulant Control Act and the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukui Prefecture |
| Jan 29, 2026 | K.K. Kohopeinto 株式会社コーホーペイント The construction company was dissolved by a resolution at the shareholders' meeting on April 30, 2025. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Jan 22, 2026 | (株)二隆建設 Kabushiki Kaisha Nitiro Kensetsu submitted a construction business license application containing false information regarding a significant matter, despite being subject to Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act due to the conviction of its officers for fines under the Penal Code. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Nara Prefecture |
| Jan 20, 2026 | (株)林栄工務店 The representative of Hayashi Ei Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for crimes under Article 261 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907) by the Tagawa Branch of the Fukuoka District Court, and the sentence was finalized on December 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukuoka Prefecture |
| Jan 9, 2026 | 中統株式会社 Did not receive a notification from the construction company within 30 days after the announcement stating that the location of the business office or the construction company's whereabouts could not be confirmed. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kumamoto Prefecture |
| Jan 7, 2026 | 株式会社千 The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on December 17, 2022. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Dec 26, 2025 | K.K. Seven Seas 株式会社Seven Seas The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Dec 25, 2025 | 松永製畳襖店 Regarding Matsunaga Seitatoufusuden, the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on November 14, Reiwa 7, but no claims were made within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukuoka Prefecture |
| Dec 10, 2025 | K.K. GSF 株式会社GSF The construction company ceased employing the persons responsible for business management and the technical officer at the office as defined under Article 7, Items 1 and 2 of the Construction Business Act as of August 31, Reiwa 7 (2025). These persons are no longer serving as full-time officers of the company or working exclusively at the company's office, and therefore the company no longer meets the licensing standards specified in Items 1 and 2 of the same article. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Dec 9, 2025 | Mazu K.K. マーズ株式会社 Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Official Gazette Regular Issue No. 662 on November 7, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Dec 6, 2025 | 有限会社北浦工務店 The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on September 7, 2022. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Dec 4, 2025 | K.K. NAKOSHI 株式会社NAKOSHI The representative director of Nakoshi Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on March 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Mie Prefecture |
| Nov 27, 2025 | 株式会社國見電気 The construction company’s management personnel responsible for business operations under Article 7, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act and the office technician specified in Article 7, Item 2 of the same Act died on August 11, 2025. They were no longer serving as full-time officers of the company, nor were they continuously present at the company’s office engaged solely in duties, thus no longer meeting the licensing standards stipulated in Articles 7, Items 1 and 2 of the Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Nov 27, 2025 | 潮﨑建設 The representative was convicted of violating the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1965) and received a sentence of 1 year and 6 months imprisonment with a 3-year probation from the Wakayama District Court, and the sentence has been finalized. This is recognized as corresponding to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Wakayama Prefecture |
| Nov 27, 2025 | K.K. Miyaden 株式会社ミヤデン The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a four-year suspension for violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on June 28, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Nov 26, 2025 | 小杉建築 Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 658 on October 24, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Nov 21, 2025 | 株式会社三芳園 The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a four-year suspension for a violation of Article 155, Paragraph 1 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on August 15, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Nov 19, 2025 | 星野実業株式会社 The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, with a 3-year probation, for violations of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles. The sentence was finalized on July 5, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Nov 18, 2025 | Yamadachong Ji やまだ重機 Because the location of Yamada Heavy Machinery's sales office could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 663 dated October 10, 2025, but no application was received from the company within 30 days of the announcement. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Nov 11, 2025 | 寺田装建 The representative of Terada Souken was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison for violating the Stimulant Control Law, with a three-year probation, and the sentence was finalized on September 10, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hyogo Prefecture |
| Nov 7, 2025 | 株式会社増田建設 The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving Motor Vehicles and the Road Traffic Act. He was sentenced to six months in prison with a three-year suspension, and the sentence was finalized on January 7, 2025. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Nov 1, 2025 | K.K. Guan Xi Burotukugong Shi 株式会社関西ブロック工事 The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment with a 4-year suspension for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Oct 30, 2025 | 株式会社実商 Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Gazette Regular Issue No. 649 dated September 22, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This corresponds to Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Oct 27, 2025 | (有)高橋機設工業 The representative director of Takahashi Kisekigyo Co., Ltd. was found to fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 7 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hokkaido Prefecture |
| Oct 9, 2025 | 株式会社金城工業 The director of the construction company was sentenced to 2 years and 8 months of imprisonment for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on April 4, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Oct 8, 2025 | 株式会社山城工業 A former director of Yamashiro Kogyo received a summary order of a 100,000 yen fine on August 24, 2022, for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 10, 2022. As a result, during his tenure as director, he was subject to Item 12 of Article 8 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Toyama Prefecture |
| Oct 6, 2025 | K.K. Daisingong Ye 株式会社ダイシン工業 The representative director of Daisin Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for violating the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts, and the sentence was completed on May 7, 2022. This constitutes a disqualification under Article 8, Item 8 of the Building Business Act. The company did not submit the required notification under Article 11, Paragraph 5 of the same law, and falsely claimed that it did not meet disqualification criteria to obtain renewal of its construction business license by the deadline of April 13, 2023. These actions violate Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the same law. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hyogo Prefecture |
| Oct 3, 2025 | 大栄建設株式会社 Daiei Construction Co., Ltd. received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court Yokosuka Branch on October 24, 2024, at 4:00 PM, and the proceedings concluded on July 3, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Oct 3, 2025 | 有限会社当木建設 Toki Construction Limited Company was dissolved by a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders on April 30, 2023, and completed liquidation on October 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Oct 1, 2025 | Bewunder K.K. BeWunder株式会社 The construction company ceased to meet the licensing standards under the Construction Business Act because the person responsible for business management and the designated technical officer at the specified office resigned by April 16, Reiwa 7 (2025), and was no longer serving as a full-time director or working exclusively at the company's office. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Sep 30, 2025 | (株)友成建設 Regarding Tomonari Construction Co., Ltd., the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on August 15, 2025. No objections were received within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukuoka Prefecture |
| Sep 30, 2025 | K.K. Jing Zi Riarutei 株式会社京滋リアルティ Officers of Kyoji Realty Co., Ltd. were convicted of violating the Stimulant Control Law (Act No. 252 of 1951) and received a sentence of 1 year and 6 months in prison (with a 3-year probation) by the Kyoto District Court on April 23, 2025. The sentence was finalized on May 8, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kyoto Prefecture |
| Sep 29, 2025 | K.K. Yosidashe Bei 株式会社ヨシダ設備 Yoshida Setsubi Co., Ltd. applied for renewal of its construction business license on November 30, 2023. Despite having completed the sentence for violating the Cannabis Control Law with a one-year imprisonment (probation for three years) on May 2, 2015, and having the probation revoked on December 5, 2017, and completing the sentence on January 3, 2020, the company submitted a sworn statement (Form No. 6) asserting it did not fall under disqualification requirements, and a record (Form No. 12) stating that the officer had not received any awards or punishments, and obtained a construction license on February 13, 2024, through fraudulent means. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Building Business Act, and is subject to license cancellation under the same provision. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kyoto Prefecture |
| Sep 29, 2025 | 株式会社住MILE Sumile Corporation received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court at 4:00 PM on February 26, Reiwa 6 (2024), and the discontinuation of the proceedings was finalized on June 20 of the same year. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Sep 29, 2025 | 日本住研株式会社 Nihon Juken Co., Ltd. received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 31, 2022, and the proceedings concluded on August 31, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Sep 29, 2025 | 株式会社築宅 Kabushiki Kaisha Chikutaku was dissolved by a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders on December 5, 2022, and completed liquidation on May 20, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Sep 29, 2025 | 株式会社飯澤工務店 Iizawa Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Tachikawa Branch of the Tokyo District Court at 5:00 PM on November 22, 2022, which concluded on April 25, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Sep 26, 2025 | 株式会社神通 A former director of Jintsu Corporation received a summary order of a 100,000 yen fine on August 24, 2022, for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 10, 2022. During the period of being a director, this constituted a violation of Item 12, Article 8 of the Building Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Toyama Prefecture |
| Sep 26, 2025 | 草野工業(株) The representative director of Kusano Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine on July 19, 2023, for violating the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukushima Prefecture |
| Sep 25, 2025 | 株式会社山工建 The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Sep 18, 2025 | 株式会社長谷部工業 A corporate officer was sentenced to imprisonment, and the sentence was finalized, which corresponds to the provisions of Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act. This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Tokushima Prefecture |
| Sep 17, 2025 | Ltd. Sakaezao Yuan Tu Mu 有限会社サカエ造園土木 The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 300,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 6, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Sep 10, 2025 | K.K. Wagou 株式会社わごう The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, with a 3-year probation, for violations of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles. The sentence was finalized on October 24, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Sep 2, 2025 | 株式会社勇輝土木興業 The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving a Motor Vehicle (Act No. 86 of 2013) and the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960). He was sentenced to one year and two months in prison with a three-year probation, and the sentence was finalized on November 10, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Aug 27, 2025 | 合同会社昇栄工業 The representative director of the construction company was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with a 3-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on July 10, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Aug 19, 2025 | 有限会社吉川設備工業 An officer of Yoshikawa Setsubi Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code. As a result, the company falls under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act (for those among the officers who fall under Item 8). This constitutes grounds for license cancellation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Saitama Prefecture |
| Aug 14, 2025 | 水戸建設工業(株) It was found that the directors of Mito Construction Industry Co., Ltd. fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 8 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hokkaido Prefecture |
| Aug 5, 2025 | LEIBROTHERS K.K. LEI・BROTHERS株式会社 Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Official Gazette Regular Issue No. 625 on July 1, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company after 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kanagawa Prefecture |
| Jul 24, 2025 | K.K. Yuusiyou 株式会社ユウショウ The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving a Vehicle (Act No. 86 of 2013). He was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with a 3-year suspension, and the sentence was finalized on December 13, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Jul 17, 2025 | (株)鈴木住設工業 It was found that the director of the construction company falls under the disqualifications specified in Article 8, Items 8 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hokkaido Prefecture |
| Jul 15, 2025 | 株式会社富士建 Officers of Fuji Ken Co., Ltd. received a summary order of a fine of 400,000 yen from Marugame Summary Court on August 5, 2021, for the crime of injury (Article 204 of the Penal Code), and the sentence was finalized on August 24, 2021. This constitutes grounds for the cancellation of their construction business permit under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act (corresponding to Item 12 of Article 8 of the same Act). | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kagawa Prefecture |
| Jun 23, 2025 | 株式会社金子工業 It has been found that an officer of Kaneko Kogyo Co., Ltd. falls under the disqualification requirements stipulated in Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act. This is recognized as corresponding to Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kyūshū Regional Development Bureau |
| Jun 21, 2025 | K.K. Sinei 株式会社シンエイ The construction company did not meet the standards for a designated office technician as stipulated in Article 15, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act, as of April 1, 2025, because the technician was affiliated with another company, was not permanently employed at the company's office, and was not exclusively engaged in duties at the office. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| May 16, 2025 | 株式会社幸建舎 Made a public notice that the location of the business office could not be confirmed, but no application was made within 30 days after the notice. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Saitama Prefecture |
| May 16, 2025 | 市塚設備 Made a public notice that the location of the business office could not be confirmed, but no application was made within 30 days after the notice. This corresponds to Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Saitama Prefecture |
| May 16, 2025 | 有限会社原田設備工業 Made a public notice that the location of the business office could not be confirmed, but no application was received after 30 days from the notice. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Saitama Prefecture |
| May 10, 2025 | 九龍建創有限会社 The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violations of Articles 235 and 130 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 26, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| May 9, 2025 | 有限会社清水工務店 Because the location of the office of Yugen Kaisha Shimizu Komuten could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefectural Gazette No. 608 dated April 1, 2025, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Apr 23, 2025 | (株)技研 The representative director of Giken Corporation was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment by the Kurume Branch of the Fukuoka District Court for violations of Articles 235 and 130 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), with the sentence finalized on August 19, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukuoka Prefecture |
| Apr 16, 2025 | Bei She Birudo K.K. 北摂ビルド株式会社 The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Apr 10, 2025 | 有限会社上野電気商会 The director of the construction company was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months in prison with a 4-year suspension for violations of the Stimulant Control Act, the Cannabis Control Act, and the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, and the sentence was finalized on January 7, 2025. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Apr 8, 2025 | (株)黒田工業 The directors of Kuroda Kogyo Co., Ltd. were found to fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 8 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hokkaido Prefecture |
| Apr 8, 2025 | ((有))大空電気 The representative director of Osora Denki Ltd. was sentenced to a fine under Article 208 of the Penal Code on June 3, 2023, and it was found that less than five years had passed since the completion of the sentence or the cessation of the execution of the sentence. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hokkaido Prefecture |
| Apr 7, 2025 | 株式会社橋本工業 Kashimoto Kogyo Co., Ltd. submitted a list of designated technical personnel that included a designated technical personnel who was not exclusively engaged in their duties at the office and was not a full-time employee, during their construction business license renewal application on March 18, 2020. As a result, they obtained a construction business license on May 31, 2020, through fraudulent means. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act and is subject to license cancellation based on this provision. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kyoto Prefecture |
| Apr 1, 2025 | K.K. Tamura 株式会社タムラ The director of the construction company was sentenced to one year and eight months of imprisonment with a three-year probation for violations of Articles 174 and 176 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on November 9, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 31, 2025 | (有)松瀬工務店 On December 14, 2023, Matsuse Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a suspension of business under Article 28, Paragraph 3 of the Building Business Act (applicable to Items 2 and 3 of Paragraph 1 of the same article). The suspension was ordered for one year, from December 28, 2023, to December 27, 2024, concerning public works or private projects receiving subsidies or grants. Despite this, the company conducted three bidding activities for public works ordered by Nagiso Town during the suspension period, and one of these resulted in a new construction contract signed on December 2, 2024, which was then executed. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 8 of the Building Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Nagano Prefecture |
| Mar 29, 2025 | K.K. Toa 株式会社トーア The director of the construction company was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with a 2-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on April 10, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 21, 2025 | 株式会社友工 Kokyo Corporation applied for renewal of its construction business license on February 28, 2024. Despite the fact that its representative director's sentence for habitual gambling was finalized on February 16, 2024, with a 10-month imprisonment (probation for three years), the company submitted a sworn statement (Form No. 6) asserting that the representative did not fall under disqualification requirements, a biography of the full-time officer indicating no awards or punishments (Form No. 7 Appendix), and a record of address and date of birth (Form No. 12) for the license application. The license was granted on March 22, 2024, through unlawful means. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act, and is subject to license cancellation under the same provision. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Kyoto Prefecture |
| Mar 14, 2025 | 株式会社勇健工務店 Because the location of the construction company's office could not be confirmed, an announcement was made in the Aichi Prefecture Public Notice. However, no application was received within 30 days from the date of the announcement. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Aichi Prefecture |
| Mar 12, 2025 | K.K. Y's 株式会社Y’s The director of the construction company was sentenced to 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment with a 3-year suspension for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on March 13, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 11, 2025 | K.K. Keieienziniaringu 株式会社ケイエイエンジニアリング The director of the construction company was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on February 17, 2023. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Mar 11, 2025 | K.K. Peaceland 株式会社PeaceLand Because the location of PeaceLand Corporation's business office could not be confirmed, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefectural Gazette No. 591 dated January 31, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Mar 5, 2025 | K.K. Nizupuroziekuto (株)ニーズプロジェクト The representative director of Needs Project Co., Ltd. was found to fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 8 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Hokkaido Prefecture |
| Feb 7, 2025 | K.K. Hirozhu Zhuang (株)ヒロ住装 The representative director of Hirosumiso Co., Ltd. was sentenced to three years in prison for theft and trespassing on January 26, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Fukushima Prefecture |
| Jan 22, 2025 | K.K. Uotasapuraizhu Dao Shang Hui 株式会社ウォーターサプライ住道商会 The construction company violated regulations by submitting false information in their permit application documents, including misrepresenting office details, employment status of key personnel, and experience qualifications. They also falsely claimed that non-eligible personnel were authorized technical managers, and provided inaccurate documentation to obtain construction business permits on July 17, 2020. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Jan 22, 2025 | 株式会社辻村技電 The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on October 12, 2024. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Osaka Prefecture |
| Jan 22, 2025 | 鎌田工業株式会社 A shareholder of Kamata Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to 8 months imprisonment with a 4-year probation for violating the Road Traffic Act, and the sentence was finalized on December 28, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Yamaguchi Prefecture |
| Jan 16, 2025 | 川南鋼機株式会社 A director of Kawanami Koki Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine of 300,000 yen under Article 204 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 30, 2021. Despite this, on May 25, 2023, the director submitted a construction business license application including a pledge stating that the applicant and its officers do not fall under disqualification requirements specified in each item of Article 8 of the Construction Business Act, and an employment history of officers stating no awards or punishments. The license was granted on June 23, 2023, through fraudulent means. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the same Act. | Construction Business Act | License Revocation | - | Gunma Prefecture |