License Revocation Records in Japan

営業所の所在地を確知できず、宮城県公報の宮城県告示第２９３号（令和８年３月３１日）で公告したが同日から３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。 このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第２項に該当する。

株式会社トラストワークスは、令和７年７月18日午後４時に横浜地方裁判所の破産手続開始決定を受け、令和８年２月25日に同手続廃止の決定が確定した。 このことは、建設業法第29条第１項第５号に該当する。

営業所の所在地を確知できず、宮城県公報の宮城県告示第２９３号（令和８年３月３１日）で公告したが同日から３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。 このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

有限会社リ．ファインアクトの取締役は、建設業法第８条第７号及び第12号に規定する欠格事由に該当することが判明した。 このことは、建設業法第29条第１項第２号に該当するものである。

当該建設業者の取締役が、刑法（明治40年法律第45号）第176条及び第180条の罪により、懲役１年６月執行猶予３年の刑に処せられ、令和６年９月28日にその刑が確定した。

匠耀防水株式会社の元役員が、令和６年５月１５日付けで禁錮以上の刑に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又はその刑の執行を受 けることがなくなった日から５年を経過しない者に該当していたことが判明した。

有限会社石塚工業の代表取締役は、刑法（明治40年法律第４５号）第186条第1項等の罪により、福岡地方裁判所小倉支部から拘禁刑10月の判決を受け、令和８年３月29日にその刑が確定している。このことは、建設業法第29条第１項第２号に該当する。

当該建設業者は、当該建設業者の建設業法（以下「法」といいます。）第15条第１項第２号に規定する特定営業所技術者が、当該建設業者の営業所に常勤して専ら職務に従事しておらず、同号の許可の基準を満たしていなかった。 また、同人が、建築士法第24条に規定の建築士事務所を管理する建築士として配置されていることを知りながら、同人を法第７条第２号に規定の営業所技術者とする虚偽の内容で、令和７年１月22日に建設業許可を申請し、同年２月14日に一般建設業の許可を受けた。 その上、当該建設業者は同人を法第15条第２号に規定する特定営業所技術者とする虚偽の内容で、同年４月22日に建設業許可の申請をし、同年５月21日に特定建設業の許可を受けた。 さらに、当該建設業者の取締役が、法（昭和24年法律第100号）違反により、罰金30万円の刑に処せられ、令和７年11月26日にその刑が確定した。

当該建設業者の取締役が、刑法（明治40年法律第45号）第204条の罪により、懲役6月執行猶予3年の刑に処せられ、令和5年9月20日にその刑が確定した。

株式会社小松 の取締役は、 建設業法第 ８条第 ７号及び第 12号に規定する欠格事由に該当することが判明した。 このことは、建設業法第 29 条第１項第２号 に該当するものである。

当該建設業者の営業所及び代表者の所在が確知できないため、その旨を令和8年4月3日付け兵庫県公報で公告したが、公告の日から30日を経過しても当該建設業者からの申出はなかった。 このことは、建設業法第29条の2第1項の規定に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

営業所の所在地が確認できない旨の公告を行ったが、公告後３０日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第２９条の２第１項に該当する。

当該建設業者の役員が、刑法第204条の罪により、罰金刑に処せられ、令和５年７月11日に刑の執行が終了してから５年を経過しておらず（建設業法第８条第12号及び第８号）、建設業法第29条第１項第２号に該当する。

当該建設業者の取締役が、道路交通法（昭和35年法律第105号）違反により、懲役6月執行猶予3年の刑に処せられ、令和6年9月25日にその刑が確定した。

株式会社ジェイプランニングの営業所の所在地を確知することができないため、令和８年３月27日付け静岡県公報第710号でその旨を公告したが、当該公告の日から30日を経過しても同社から申出がなかった。

当該建設業者の取締役が、刑法（明治40年法律第45号）第208条の罪により、罰金15万円の刑に処せられ、令和４年１月12日にその刑が確定した。

当該建設業者の営業所の所在地が確知できないため、令和８年３月11日大阪府告示第368号によりその事実を公告したが、当該公告の日から30日を経過しても当該建設業者から申出がなかった。

Because the location of the construction company's office could not be confirmed, it was announced in the Kagoshima Prefecture Public Notice on March 17, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days of the announcement.

営業所が確知できないため富山県公報でこの旨を公告したが、30日を経過しても申出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第29条の２第1項に該当する。

The director of the construction company was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on November 28, 2025.

The construction company failed to meet the standards for a specified office technician as stipulated in Article 15, Paragraph 2 of the Building Business Act, as the individual was not a full-time employee dedicated solely to duties. Additionally, the company submitted false information in permit applications under Articles 5 and 6 of the Building Business Act, claiming that the individual was a specified office technician and was not receiving salary from the company, despite not being a full-time employee. The company also filed a notification that it had abolished all permits for specified construction businesses, which is a violation of Article 12, Item 5 of the Building Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 200,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on December 24, 2025.

The representative director of Water System Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine under the Penal Code, and the execution of the sentence was completed on August 14, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Aiba Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Shizuoka District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 2, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 682 on January 23, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The officer of Kusakari Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to imprisonment or a more severe penalty on September 5, 2025, and it was found that less than five years have passed since the completion of the sentence or the person no longer being subject to the sentence. This corresponds to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the law.

The representative director of Kunitada Denki Co., Ltd. submitted false qualification certificates during the construction business license application, claiming to possess the necessary qualifications for a designated technical engineer as required by the Building Business Act. Despite not having the qualifications, they presented certificates including a first-class architectural construction management engineer certificate and a first-class architect license, and obtained the license on November 6, 2015, through fraudulent means. The license was also renewed on November 6, 2020, under the same false pretenses. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Act.

It was found that the former director of Smileful Home Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on October 11, 2024. This corresponds to Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on June 11, 2024.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for a violation of Article 235 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on June 26, 2024.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on November 9, 2023.

Because the location of the office of Yugen Kaisha Sekigumi could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 690 dated January 16, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement.

The representative director of Shinmei Greenery Co., Ltd. was sentenced on November 17, 2025, to one year in prison with a three-year suspension for obstructing a public contract auction bid, and the sentence was finalized on December 2, 2025. As a result, they fall under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act. This also corresponds to Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Construction Business Act.

Because the location of Suzuki Housing Equipment's sales office could not be determined, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 688 dated January 9, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 70,000 yen for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), with the sentence finalized on March 24, 2023. Additionally, the construction company submitted false information in the permit application under Article 5 of the Construction Business Act and in documents under Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the same law, and received an update of the permit under Article 3, Paragraph 3 of the Act.

The representative director of Tsuruoka Watabe Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment under Article 25, Paragraph 1, Item 14 of the Act on Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning (Act No. 137 of 1970), with the sentence finalized on December 26, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative director of PRESI Co., Ltd. was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension on December 21, 2023, by the Fukui District Court for violations of the Stimulant Control Act and the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company was dissolved by a resolution at the shareholders' meeting on April 30, 2025.

Kabushiki Kaisha Nitiro Kensetsu submitted a construction business license application containing false information regarding a significant matter, despite being subject to Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act due to the conviction of its officers for fines under the Penal Code. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative of Hayashi Ei Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for crimes under Article 261 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907) by the Tagawa Branch of the Fukuoka District Court, and the sentence was finalized on December 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Did not receive a notification from the construction company within 30 days after the announcement stating that the location of the business office or the construction company's whereabouts could not be confirmed.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on December 17, 2022.

The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days.

Regarding Matsunaga Seitatoufusuden, the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on November 14, Reiwa 7, but no claims were made within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company ceased employing the persons responsible for business management and the technical officer at the office as defined under Article 7, Items 1 and 2 of the Construction Business Act as of August 31, Reiwa 7 (2025). These persons are no longer serving as full-time officers of the company or working exclusively at the company's office, and therefore the company no longer meets the licensing standards specified in Items 1 and 2 of the same article.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Official Gazette Regular Issue No. 662 on November 7, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on September 7, 2022.

The representative director of Nakoshi Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on March 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a four-year suspension for violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on June 28, 2024.

The construction company’s management personnel responsible for business operations under Article 7, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act and the office technician specified in Article 7, Item 2 of the same Act died on August 11, 2025. They were no longer serving as full-time officers of the company, nor were they continuously present at the company’s office engaged solely in duties, thus no longer meeting the licensing standards stipulated in Articles 7, Items 1 and 2 of the Act.

The representative was convicted of violating the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1965) and received a sentence of 1 year and 6 months imprisonment with a 3-year probation from the Wakayama District Court, and the sentence has been finalized. This is recognized as corresponding to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 658 on October 24, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a four-year suspension for a violation of Article 155, Paragraph 1 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on August 15, 2023.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, with a 3-year probation, for violations of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles. The sentence was finalized on July 5, 2023.

Because the location of Yamada Heavy Machinery's sales office could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 663 dated October 10, 2025, but no application was received from the company within 30 days of the announcement.

The representative of Terada Souken was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison for violating the Stimulant Control Law, with a three-year probation, and the sentence was finalized on September 10, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving Motor Vehicles and the Road Traffic Act. He was sentenced to six months in prison with a three-year suspension, and the sentence was finalized on January 7, 2025.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment with a 4-year suspension for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Gazette Regular Issue No. 649 dated September 22, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This corresponds to Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative director of Takahashi Kisekigyo Co., Ltd. was found to fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 7 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 2 years and 8 months of imprisonment for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on April 4, 2023.

A former director of Yamashiro Kogyo received a summary order of a 100,000 yen fine on August 24, 2022, for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 10, 2022. As a result, during his tenure as director, he was subject to Item 12 of Article 8 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Act.

The representative director of Daisin Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for violating the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts, and the sentence was completed on May 7, 2022. This constitutes a disqualification under Article 8, Item 8 of the Building Business Act. The company did not submit the required notification under Article 11, Paragraph 5 of the same law, and falsely claimed that it did not meet disqualification criteria to obtain renewal of its construction business license by the deadline of April 13, 2023. These actions violate Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the same law.

Toki Construction Limited Company was dissolved by a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders on April 30, 2023, and completed liquidation on October 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Daiei Construction Co., Ltd. received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court Yokosuka Branch on October 24, 2024, at 4:00 PM, and the proceedings concluded on July 3, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company ceased to meet the licensing standards under the Construction Business Act because the person responsible for business management and the designated technical officer at the specified office resigned by April 16, Reiwa 7 (2025), and was no longer serving as a full-time director or working exclusively at the company's office. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Regarding Tomonari Construction Co., Ltd., the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on August 15, 2025. No objections were received within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Officers of Kyoji Realty Co., Ltd. were convicted of violating the Stimulant Control Law (Act No. 252 of 1951) and received a sentence of 1 year and 6 months in prison (with a 3-year probation) by the Kyoto District Court on April 23, 2025. The sentence was finalized on May 8, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Kabushiki Kaisha Chikutaku was dissolved by a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders on December 5, 2022, and completed liquidation on May 20, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Sumile Corporation received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court at 4:00 PM on February 26, Reiwa 6 (2024), and the discontinuation of the proceedings was finalized on June 20 of the same year. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Iizawa Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Tachikawa Branch of the Tokyo District Court at 5:00 PM on November 22, 2022, which concluded on April 25, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Yoshida Setsubi Co., Ltd. applied for renewal of its construction business license on November 30, 2023. Despite having completed the sentence for violating the Cannabis Control Law with a one-year imprisonment (probation for three years) on May 2, 2015, and having the probation revoked on December 5, 2017, and completing the sentence on January 3, 2020, the company submitted a sworn statement (Form No. 6) asserting it did not fall under disqualification requirements, and a record (Form No. 12) stating that the officer had not received any awards or punishments, and obtained a construction license on February 13, 2024, through fraudulent means. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Building Business Act, and is subject to license cancellation under the same provision.

Nihon Juken Co., Ltd. received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 31, 2022, and the proceedings concluded on August 31, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

A former director of Jintsu Corporation received a summary order of a 100,000 yen fine on August 24, 2022, for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 10, 2022. During the period of being a director, this constituted a violation of Item 12, Article 8 of the Building Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations.

The representative director of Kusano Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine on July 19, 2023, for violating the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days.

A corporate officer was sentenced to imprisonment, and the sentence was finalized, which corresponds to the provisions of Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act. This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 300,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 6, 2024.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, with a 3-year probation, for violations of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles. The sentence was finalized on October 24, 2024.

The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving a Motor Vehicle (Act No. 86 of 2013) and the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960). He was sentenced to one year and two months in prison with a three-year probation, and the sentence was finalized on November 10, 2023.

The representative director of the construction company was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with a 3-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on July 10, 2024.

An officer of Yoshikawa Setsubi Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code. As a result, the company falls under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act (for those among the officers who fall under Item 8). This constitutes grounds for license cancellation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

It was found that the directors of Mito Construction Industry Co., Ltd. fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 8 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Official Gazette Regular Issue No. 625 on July 1, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company after 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving a Vehicle (Act No. 86 of 2013). He was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with a 3-year suspension, and the sentence was finalized on December 13, 2023.

It was found that the director of the construction company falls under the disqualifications specified in Article 8, Items 8 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

Officers of Fuji Ken Co., Ltd. received a summary order of a fine of 400,000 yen from Marugame Summary Court on August 5, 2021, for the crime of injury (Article 204 of the Penal Code), and the sentence was finalized on August 24, 2021. This constitutes grounds for the cancellation of their construction business permit under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act (corresponding to Item 12 of Article 8 of the same Act).

It has been found that an officer of Kaneko Kogyo Co., Ltd. falls under the disqualification requirements stipulated in Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act. This is recognized as corresponding to Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the same Act.

The construction company did not meet the standards for a designated office technician as stipulated in Article 15, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act, as of April 1, 2025, because the technician was affiliated with another company, was not permanently employed at the company's office, and was not exclusively engaged in duties at the office.

Made a public notice that the location of the business office could not be confirmed, but no application was made within 30 days after the notice. This corresponds to Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Made a public notice that the location of the business office could not be confirmed, but no application was received after 30 days from the notice. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Made a public notice that the location of the business office could not be confirmed, but no application was made within 30 days after the notice. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.