License Revocation Records in Japan

For (株)大川内組, the location of the construction business office could not be confirmed. Fukuoka Prefecture published a notice to that effect in the Fukuoka Prefectural Gazette dated September 8, Reiwa 8 (2026). No request/notification was made even after 30 days. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Hyogo Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of Kabushiki Kaisha Nishida Kusabanaen. The company’s representative director, Kenji Nishida, was convicted for a violation of the Money Lending Business Act, with a sentence of 1 year and 6 months’ imprisonment and a fine of JPY 1,000,000, which became final on July 15, Reiwa 8 (2026). This was treated as falling under Article 8, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act, and therefore under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

Daikō Denken Co., Ltd. (法人番号2021001026410) had its construction business license for the electrical work business cancelled by Kanagawa Prefecture. The decision states that, for the office technical personnel required under Article 7, Paragraph 2 of the Construction Business Act, in June 2023 the personnel were affiliated with another company and were not continuously employed at the company’s office to engage exclusively in their duties, and therefore the company is considered not to meet the license criteria set out in that provision. This is stated to fall under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act.

On December 10, Reiwa 7 (令和7年12月10日), the construction business was dissolved by a resolution of the shareholders’ meeting.

Osaka Prefecture announced in the Osaka Prefecture Official Gazette that it could not confirm the construction business office location of the relevant construction contractor, but no request/notification was made even after 30 days.

Kanagawa Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of Innovation Home Co., Ltd. because the company’s office location could not be confirmed. A public notice was issued in the Kanagawa Prefectural Official Gazette (Regular Edition) No. 741 dated August 21, Reiwa 8 (2026), but no request/notification was made by the construction business operator even after 30 days. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Osaka Prefecture cancelled the construction business license of 中平電気工事 (permit No. 大阪府知事許可（般－３）第146005号) under Article 29(1)(2) of the Construction Business Act. The company was sentenced to a fine of JPY 200,000 for the offense under Article 204 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence became final on April 4, Reiwa 7 (2025).

Kanazawa Seizai Kogyo Kyodo Kumiai had its construction business license cancelled by Ishikawa Prefecture under Article 29(1)(1) of the Construction Business Act. The organization’s management-responsible person for business management (as provided in Article 7(1)(i)) and its office technical personnel (as provided in Article 7(1)(ii)) were operating separate individual businesses and were not stationed full-time at the organization’s office to devote themselves exclusively to their duties, and therefore did not meet the permit standards set out in those provisions.

On September 9, 2026, Osaka Prefecture canceled the construction business permit of Shikou Sangyo Co., Ltd. (corporate number: 3120101054574) under Article 29(1)(2) of the Construction Business Act. The stated cause is that the company’s director was sentenced to a fine of JPY 100,000 for the offense under Article 208 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907) and the sentence became final on July 9, 2022.

E-Life Co., Ltd.（（株）イーライフ） had its permit for a specified construction business related to electrical work (特定建設業) cancelled by Fukuoka Prefecture. The cancellation was based on the fact that the location of the construction business office could not be confirmed; Fukuoka Prefecture公告ed this in the Fukuoka Prefectural Gazette dated July 31, Reiwa 8 (2026), but no request/notification was made even after 30 days. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act (建設業法第29条の２第１項).

On 26 August 2026, Kochi Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of Yugen Kaisha Shikoku Tsushin System (corporate number 5490002008376) under Article 29(1)(ii) of the Construction Business Act (建設業法). The decision states that the company’s representative director, Eiji Yūto (榮 勇男), conspired with Ono Kazuyuki (小野和幸), then representative director of Inoue Denco Co., Ltd. (株式会社井上電工), and the then Mayor of Tosashimizu City and members of the Tosashimizu City assembly, regarding a designated-competition bidding process conducted by Tosashimizu City for the “Lodging-type Multicultural Coexistence Community Facility Renovation Work (Electrical Equipment).” The decision further states that they provided guidance on the minimum restricted price, resulting in Inoue Denco Co., Ltd. being awarded the contract. The decision states that, as a result, on 10 June 2026, the Kochi District Court found the conduct in violation of Article 96-6(1) of the Penal Code (as it was before amendments by the Act Partially Amending the Penal Code, etc. (Act No. 67 of 2022)) in relation to Article 60 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), and imposed a sentence of imprisonment for one year with a three-year suspension; the sentence became final on the same date. The decision concludes that this falls under Article 29(1)(ii) of the Construction Business Act.

Osaka Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of 有限会社山口建装工業 (corporate number 4120102016242). The cancellation was based on Construction Business Act Article 29(1)(2). The company’s director was convicted under Criminal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907) Article 208 and was sentenced to a fine of JPY 100,000; the conviction became final on September 20, 2024.

On August 22, 2026, Osaka Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of 株式会社能登屋水道工業所 (corporate number 7120001024839) under Article 29(1)(2) of the Construction Business Act (建設業法). The cancellation relates to the company’s director being convicted under Article 208 of the Penal Code (刑法, Meiji 40, Law No. 45) and sentenced to a fine of JPY 100,000, with the conviction becoming final on November 16, 2021.

On August 18, 2026, Okinawa Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of 株式会社與那下 (corporate number 6360001025442) for general construction business related to plastering work. The decision states that the company’s representative director, 與那下 将輝, was convicted and the sentence became final on September 26, 2025, by the Naha District Court for offenses under Article 204 and Article 249(1) of the Penal Code prior to amendments made by the Act Partially Amending the Penal Code (Act No. 67 of 2022). The decision indicates this falls under Article 8 items (7) and (12) of the Construction Business Act, and therefore the permit cancellation is recognized as falling under Article 29(1)(2) of the same Act.

Miyagi Prefecture canceled the general construction business permit for 株式会社CocoReno. The company’s office location could not be confirmed; Miyagi Prefecture公告ed this in Miyagi Prefecture Public Notice (Miyagi Prefecture Notice No. 293) dated March 31, 令和8 (2026). No request/notification was made within 30 days from the date of the公告. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 4 of the Construction Business Act.

Okinawa Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of Kamisato Kogyo Co., Ltd. (corporate number: 4360001028018). The representative director, Yo Kamisato, was convicted and the conviction became final on August 23, 2023 by the Naha Summary Court (Okinawa) for the offense of assault under Article 208 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), with a fine of JPY 100,000. This was treated as falling under Article 8, Item 8 of the Construction Business Act, and therefore as falling under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

Yuusei Co., Ltd. (（株）ユウセイ) had its general construction business permit cancelled by Fukuoka Prefecture. The company’s officer was convicted for a violation of the Construction Business Act (Act No. 100 of 1950) by the Fukuoka Summary Court and was sentenced to a fine of JPY 500,000; the conviction became final on June 4, Reiwa 8 (2026). This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Tokyo announced in the Tokyo Metropolitan Gazette dated June 26, Reiwa 8 (2026) that the location of the construction business office of the relevant construction contractor could not be confirmed. No request/notification was made even after 30 days from the date of the public notice. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Tokyo announced in the Tokyo Metropolitan Government Gazette dated June 26, Reiwa 8 (2026) that the location of the construction business office of the relevant construction contractor could not be confirmed. No request/notification was made within 30 days from the date of the announcement. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

On August 18, 2026, Okinawa Prefecture cancelled the general construction business permit of 株式会社 興那下 (corporate number 6360001025442) for the plastering work business. The stated cause is that the company’s representative director, 興那下 将輝, was convicted and the sentence became final on September 26, 2025, by the Naha District Court for the offense under Article 207 of the Penal Code (Meiji 40, Law No. 45) (Special Provisions for Concurrent Injury). The text states that this falls under Article 8, items (7) and (12) of the Construction Business Act, and therefore corresponds to Article 29, paragraph (1), item (2) of the same Act.

Miyagi Prefecture revoked the general construction business permit of Godō Kaisha KOG because the company’s business office location could not be confirmed. Miyagi Prefecture公告ed this in Miyagi Prefecture Public Notice No. 293 in the Miyagi Prefecture Official Gazette dated March 31, Reiwa 8 (2026), but no request/notification was made within 30 days from that date. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 3 of the Construction Business Act.

Tokyo Metropolitan Government announced in the Tokyo Metropolitan Gazette dated June 26, 2026 that it could not confirm the location of the construction business office of the relevant construction business operator, but no request/notification was made even after 30 days from the date of the announcement. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Tokyo announced in the Tokyo Metropolitan Government Gazette dated June 26, Reiwa 8 (2026) that it could not confirm the location of the construction business office of 日本総合建設株式会社, but no request/notification was made within 30 days from the date of the announcement. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

On August 18, 2026, Okinawa Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of 株式会社 與那下 (corporate number 6360001025442) for general construction business related to plastering work. The cancellation is stated to be based on Article 29(1)(ii) of the Construction Business Act, following a criminal conviction of the company’s representative director, 與那下 将輝, by the Naha District Court on September 24, 2025 (sentence: imprisonment for 1 year and 6 months, with a 3-year suspension; conviction finalized on September 26, 2025).

Ishikawa Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of ＳＳＫ管理システム株式会社 (SSK Management System Co., Ltd.; corporate number 3220001014081). The cancellation was based on Construction Business Act, Article 29(1)(ii), due to the company’s representative director being convicted under Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 204 (Injury): on January 7, 2025, the Komatsu Summary Court issued a summary fine order of JPY 200,000, and the conviction became final on January 25, 2025.

On October 1, 2024, Shinto Esprecision Co., Ltd. (新東エスプレシジョン株式会社) ceased to exist due to a merger. This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act (建設業法).

Kanagawa Boring Industry Co., Ltd. was dissolved by resolution of a shareholders’ meeting on September 13, 2023. This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Keihin Electric Appliance Service Co., Ltd. was dissolved by a resolution of its shareholders’ meeting on September 30, 2022. This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Shizuoka Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of Yugen Kaisha Inoue Kensetsu Kogyo (有限会社井上建設興業; corporate number 9080102004123; permit no. 第36767号). The decision was based on Article 29(1)(2) of the Construction Business Act (建設業法第29条第１項第２号). The company’s officer was sentenced to a fine of JPY 300,000 by Numazu Summary Court on September 9, Reiwa 7 (令和７年９月９日) for the offense under Article 204 of the Penal Code (刑法第204条), and the sentence became final on September 26, Reiwa 7 (令和７年９月26日). This was stated to fall under the disqualification requirements in Article 8(12) of the Construction Business Act (建設業法第8条第12号), which refers to cases where among the officers there is a person falling under Article 8(8).

Meiji Kensetsu Co., Ltd. (Limited) (“（有）明治建設”) had its general construction business permit cancelled by Fukuoka Prefecture. The cancellation was based on the company’s inability to be confirmed as having a known location for its construction business office; Fukuoka Prefecture公告ed this in the Fukuoka Prefectural Gazette dated June 16, 2026 (Reiwa 8), and no request/notification was made even after 30 days. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

For Shinwa Kensetsu Co., Ltd. (（株）進和建設), the location of the construction business office could not be confirmed. The Fukuoka Prefecture public notice dated June 16, 2026 (Reiwa 8) stated this, but no request/notification was made even after 30 days. This falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act (建設業法第29条の２第１項).

Hyogo Prefecture cancelled the construction business permit of ＳＩＥＧ－Ｋ株式会社 (permit no. Hyogo Prefecture Governor (General-6) No. 219795). The representative director was fined under the Penal Code, and the execution of the fine ended on April 5, 2022 and November 22, 2022, respectively. The company did not file a notification under Article 11, Paragraph 5 of the Construction Business Act, and in its application to renew the construction business permit due by October 24, 2024, it obtained the renewal permit by falsely stating that it did not fall under disqualification requirements. These matters correspond to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Items 2 and 7 of the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefectural Government has revoked the construction business license of Sanwa Service Co., Ltd. due to the criminal convictions of its director for violations of the Penal Code and the Stimulant Control Law.

The Osaka Prefecture has revoked the construction business license of Hatsuda Setsubi Kogyo Co., Ltd. due to a criminal conviction of its director for a fine of 400,000 yen, confirmed on June 18, 2025.

The Hokkaido authority revoked the construction license of Shiraishi Kensetsu Kabushiki Kaisha on July 21, 2026, due to the previous CEO being found to meet disqualification criteria under the Building Business Act Articles 8 and 12, which also applies under Article 29(1)(2).

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Daiwa Corporation after it was dissolved due to bankruptcy on December 15, 2023.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government revoked the construction business license of株式会社ＡＳＵ ＷＯＲＫＳ due to the inability to confirm the company's office location, with no objections filed within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government revoked the construction business license of MARISS Corporation due to the inability to confirm the location of its business office, with no objections filed within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government revoked the construction business license of Kabushiki Kaisha Aiwa due to inability to confirm the location of its main office, with no objections filed within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Kinan Pipework Cooperative was revoked its construction business license by Wakayama Prefecture on July 13, 2026, due to a criminal conviction of a director under the Penal Code Article 208, which is grounds for license cancellation under the Construction Business Act Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2.

The director of Kabushiki Kaisha Yu-Shin Kogyo was sentenced to detention, resulting in the company's disqualification under the Construction Business Act, leading to the cancellation of its construction permit by Saitama Prefecture on July 10, 2026.

The Osaka Prefectural Government revoked the construction business license of株式会社ASM due to non-compliance with legal requirements regarding the qualification of its site engineer as of March 1, 2026.

The construction company株式会社久樹建工 had its construction license revoked by Osaka Prefecture after it was dissolved following a bankruptcy decision on October 9, 2025.

The Tottori Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Hamada Kogyo Co., Ltd. on June 30, 2026, due to the company's officers violating laws related to criminal income transfer prevention and being subject to disqualification under the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefecture has revoked the construction business license of Negoro Kogyo Co., Ltd. due to a director's violation of the Road Traffic Act resulting in a four-month prison sentence, finalized on September 14, 2021.

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Life Tech Innovation Co., Ltd. on June 25, 2026, due to non-compliance with the requirements for a site engineer as stipulated in the Building Business Act, Article 7, Paragraph 2, as of February 1, 2025.

The Osaka Prefectural Government revoked the construction business license of Kabushiki Kaisha Kawabuchi Kogyo on June 23, 2026, due to the death of key personnel and failure to meet licensing standards under the Building Business Act.

The Miyagi Prefectural Government canceled the general construction business license of Kabushiki Kaisha Taiga Kogyo on June 9, 2026, due to the company's failure to notify the prefecture of its business location within 30 days of public notice, as required by Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction license of Trust Works Inc. was revoked by Kanagawa Prefecture due to bankruptcy proceedings initiated by the Yokohama District Court on July 18, 2025, and confirmed on February 25, 2026, which falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

The Miyagi Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of INLE Corporation due to failure to notify the location of its office within the statutory period after public notice.

The Hokkaido authorities revoked the construction license of Yugen Kaisha R. Fine Act on June 3, 2026, due to the company's director being found to meet the disqualifying criteria under the Building Business Act Articles 8 and 12.

The Osaka Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of株式会社FOIL due to the company's director being convicted of criminal offenses under the Penal Code, with the conviction finalized on September 28, 2026.

The construction permit for Takumi Yō Waterproofing Co., Ltd. was revoked by Miyagi Prefecture on May 29, 2026, due to the company's former officer being convicted of a crime and not having exceeded five years since the completion of their sentence.

The construction permit for (有)石塚工業 was revoked by Fukuoka Prefecture on May 28, 2026, due to the company's representative's criminal conviction under the Penal Code, which constitutes grounds under the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefectural Government revoked the construction business license of Gearmax Corporation due to violations including improper staffing of designated site engineers and false application statements, compounded by a criminal conviction of a director.

The Osaka Prefectural Government has revoked the construction business license of Mizoguchi Kensou Co., Ltd. due to the criminal conviction of its director under the Penal Code. The license was canceled on May 19, 2026.

The Hokkaido authorities revoked the construction license of Komatsu Corporation on May 16, 2026, due to the company's director being found to meet disqualifying criteria under the Construction Business Act, Articles 8 and 12.

The Hyogo Prefecture revoked the construction business license of TOM Corporation on May 13, 2026, due to the inability to confirm the location of its office and representative, and the lack of response from the company within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction license of Kitasei Construction Co., Ltd. on May 11, 2026, due to failure to respond within 30 days after an announcement that the company's office location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction license of Pentec Corporation due to failure to respond after public notice of unconfirmed business location, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Sankyo Kenchiku Co., Ltd. due to a public notice regarding the unverified location of its main office, which remained unchallenged for over 30 days.

The Saitama Prefecture authorities canceled the construction business license of Sato Denki Corporation due to failure to receive any claims within 30 days after an announcement that the company's business location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Rstyle Corporation due to failure to receive any applications within 30 days after public notice that the company's business location could not be confirmed, as required by Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The company '株式会社ワールドワイド' had its construction license canceled by Saitama Prefecture on May 11, 2026, due to failure to respond within 30 days after a public notice that its business office location could not be confirmed, as required by the Building Business Act Article 29-2, Paragraph 1.

The Saitama Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Takagi Kandtetsu Industry Co., Ltd. due to failure to respond within 30 days after an announcement that the company's business office location could not be confirmed, as required by Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction license of Upstep Corporation due to failure to respond within 30 days after an announcement that the company's business location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefectural Government canceled the construction license of Fujima Komusho on May 11, 2026, due to failure to receive any claims within 30 days after public notice that the company's office location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction license of Toki-moku Ryokka Co., Ltd. was revoked by Kanagawa Prefecture on May 2, 2026, due to a violation related to a criminal conviction of an officer, which does not meet the required time elapsed since sentencing.

The Osaka Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Asakawa Corporation on May 1, 2026, due to the criminal conviction of its director for violating the Road Traffic Act, which resulted in a six-month prison sentence with a three-year probation, confirmed on September 25, 2024.

The Shizuoka Prefecture revoked the construction license of J-Planning Corporation because its business office location could not be confirmed, and no application was received within 30 days of public notice.

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction license of Mukaiichi Soken Co., Ltd. due to a criminal conviction of its director for a violation of the Penal Code, with the conviction finalized on January 12, 2022.

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Yokohama Kensetsu Co., Ltd. on April 23, 2026, due to the inability to confirm the company's office location and the lack of a response from the company after public notice.

Because the location of the construction company's office could not be confirmed, it was announced in the Kagoshima Prefecture Public Notice on March 17, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days of the announcement.

The Toyama Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Kokoro Corporation due to failure to respond after public notice regarding an unconfirmed office location, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on November 28, 2025.

The construction company failed to meet the standards for a specified office technician as stipulated in Article 15, Paragraph 2 of the Building Business Act, as the individual was not a full-time employee dedicated solely to duties. Additionally, the company submitted false information in permit applications under Articles 5 and 6 of the Building Business Act, claiming that the individual was a specified office technician and was not receiving salary from the company, despite not being a full-time employee. The company also filed a notification that it had abolished all permits for specified construction businesses, which is a violation of Article 12, Item 5 of the Building Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 200,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on December 24, 2025.

The representative director of Water System Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine under the Penal Code, and the execution of the sentence was completed on August 14, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Aiba Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Shizuoka District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 2, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 682 on January 23, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The officer of Kusakari Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to imprisonment or a more severe penalty on September 5, 2025, and it was found that less than five years have passed since the completion of the sentence or the person no longer being subject to the sentence. This corresponds to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the law.

The representative director of Kunitada Denki Co., Ltd. submitted false qualification certificates during the construction business license application, claiming to possess the necessary qualifications for a designated technical engineer as required by the Building Business Act. Despite not having the qualifications, they presented certificates including a first-class architectural construction management engineer certificate and a first-class architect license, and obtained the license on November 6, 2015, through fraudulent means. The license was also renewed on November 6, 2020, under the same false pretenses. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on June 11, 2024.

It was found that the former director of Smileful Home Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on October 11, 2024. This corresponds to Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations.

The company 'Fujimoto Waterworks Co., Ltd.' had its construction business license revoked by Wakayama Prefecture on February 25, 2026, due to a criminal conviction involving a person with control equal to or exceeding that of a director, which is grounds under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on November 9, 2023.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for a violation of Article 235 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on June 26, 2024.

Because the location of the office of Yugen Kaisha Sekigumi could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 690 dated January 16, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement.

The representative director of Shinmei Greenery Co., Ltd. was sentenced on November 17, 2025, to one year in prison with a three-year suspension for obstructing a public contract auction bid, and the sentence was finalized on December 2, 2025. As a result, they fall under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act. This also corresponds to Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Construction Business Act.

Because the location of Suzuki Housing Equipment's sales office could not be determined, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 688 dated January 9, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 70,000 yen for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), with the sentence finalized on March 24, 2023. Additionally, the construction company submitted false information in the permit application under Article 5 of the Construction Business Act and in documents under Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the same law, and received an update of the permit under Article 3, Paragraph 3 of the Act.

The representative director of Tsuruoka Watabe Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment under Article 25, Paragraph 1, Item 14 of the Act on Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning (Act No. 137 of 1970), with the sentence finalized on December 26, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative director of PRESI Co., Ltd. was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension on December 21, 2023, by the Fukui District Court for violations of the Stimulant Control Act and the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company was dissolved by a resolution at the shareholders' meeting on April 30, 2025.

Kabushiki Kaisha Nitiro Kensetsu submitted a construction business license application containing false information regarding a significant matter, despite being subject to Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act due to the conviction of its officers for fines under the Penal Code. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative of Hayashi Ei Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for crimes under Article 261 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907) by the Tagawa Branch of the Fukuoka District Court, and the sentence was finalized on December 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Did not receive a notification from the construction company within 30 days after the announcement stating that the location of the business office or the construction company's whereabouts could not be confirmed.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on December 17, 2022.

The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days.

Regarding Matsunaga Seitatoufusuden, the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on November 14, Reiwa 7, but no claims were made within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.