License Revocation Records in Japan

The Kinan Pipework Cooperative was revoked its construction business license by Wakayama Prefecture on July 13, 2026, due to a criminal conviction of a director under the Penal Code Article 208, which is grounds for license cancellation under the Construction Business Act Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government revoked the construction business license of Kabushiki Kaisha Aiwa due to inability to confirm the location of its main office, with no objections filed within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government revoked the construction business license of MARISS Corporation due to the inability to confirm the location of its business office, with no objections filed within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Tokyo Metropolitan Government revoked the construction business license of株式会社ＡＳＵ ＷＯＲＫＳ due to the inability to confirm the company's office location, with no objections filed within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefectural Government revoked the construction business license of株式会社ASM due to non-compliance with legal requirements regarding the qualification of its site engineer as of March 1, 2026.

The construction company株式会社久樹建工 had its construction license revoked by Osaka Prefecture after it was dissolved following a bankruptcy decision on October 9, 2025.

The Tottori Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Hamada Kogyo Co., Ltd. on June 30, 2026, due to the company's officers violating laws related to criminal income transfer prevention and being subject to disqualification under the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefecture has revoked the construction business license of Negoro Kogyo Co., Ltd. due to a director's violation of the Road Traffic Act resulting in a four-month prison sentence, finalized on September 14, 2021.

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Life Tech Innovation Co., Ltd. on June 25, 2026, due to non-compliance with the requirements for a site engineer as stipulated in the Building Business Act, Article 7, Paragraph 2, as of February 1, 2025.

The Osaka Prefectural Government revoked the construction business license of Kabushiki Kaisha Kawabuchi Kogyo on June 23, 2026, due to the death of key personnel and failure to meet licensing standards under the Building Business Act.

The Miyagi Prefectural Government canceled the general construction business license of Kabushiki Kaisha Taiga Kogyo on June 9, 2026, due to the company's failure to notify the prefecture of its business location within 30 days of public notice, as required by Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Miyagi Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of INLE Corporation due to failure to notify the location of its office within the statutory period after public notice.

The construction license of Trust Works Inc. was revoked by Kanagawa Prefecture due to bankruptcy proceedings initiated by the Yokohama District Court on July 18, 2025, and confirmed on February 25, 2026, which falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

The Hokkaido authorities revoked the construction license of Yugen Kaisha R. Fine Act on June 3, 2026, due to the company's director being found to meet the disqualifying criteria under the Building Business Act Articles 8 and 12.

The Osaka Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of株式会社FOIL due to the company's director being convicted of criminal offenses under the Penal Code, with the conviction finalized on September 28, 2026.

The construction permit for Takumi Yō Waterproofing Co., Ltd. was revoked by Miyagi Prefecture on May 29, 2026, due to the company's former officer being convicted of a crime and not having exceeded five years since the completion of their sentence.

The construction permit for (有)石塚工業 was revoked by Fukuoka Prefecture on May 28, 2026, due to the company's representative's criminal conviction under the Penal Code, which constitutes grounds under the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefectural Government revoked the construction business license of Gearmax Corporation due to violations including improper staffing of designated site engineers and false application statements, compounded by a criminal conviction of a director.

The Osaka Prefectural Government has revoked the construction business license of Mizoguchi Kensou Co., Ltd. due to the criminal conviction of its director under the Penal Code. The license was canceled on May 19, 2026.

The Hokkaido authorities revoked the construction license of Komatsu Corporation on May 16, 2026, due to the company's director being found to meet disqualifying criteria under the Construction Business Act, Articles 8 and 12.

The Hyogo Prefecture revoked the construction business license of TOM Corporation on May 13, 2026, due to the inability to confirm the location of its office and representative, and the lack of response from the company within 30 days of public notice, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefectural Government canceled the construction license of Fujima Komusho on May 11, 2026, due to failure to receive any claims within 30 days after public notice that the company's office location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Rstyle Corporation due to failure to receive any applications within 30 days after public notice that the company's business location could not be confirmed, as required by Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction license of Upstep Corporation due to failure to respond within 30 days after an announcement that the company's business location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The company '株式会社ワールドワイド' had its construction license canceled by Saitama Prefecture on May 11, 2026, due to failure to respond within 30 days after a public notice that its business office location could not be confirmed, as required by the Building Business Act Article 29-2, Paragraph 1.

Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction license of Pentec Corporation due to failure to respond after public notice of unconfirmed business location, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Sankyo Kenchiku Co., Ltd. due to a public notice regarding the unverified location of its main office, which remained unchallenged for over 30 days.

The Saitama Prefecture authorities canceled the construction business license of Sato Denki Corporation due to failure to receive any claims within 30 days after an announcement that the company's business location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Saitama Prefecture revoked the construction license of Kitasei Construction Co., Ltd. on May 11, 2026, due to failure to respond within 30 days after an announcement that the company's office location could not be confirmed, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The Saitama Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Takagi Kandtetsu Industry Co., Ltd. due to failure to respond within 30 days after an announcement that the company's business office location could not be confirmed, as required by Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction license of Toki-moku Ryokka Co., Ltd. was revoked by Kanagawa Prefecture on May 2, 2026, due to a violation related to a criminal conviction of an officer, which does not meet the required time elapsed since sentencing.

The Osaka Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Asakawa Corporation on May 1, 2026, due to the criminal conviction of its director for violating the Road Traffic Act, which resulted in a six-month prison sentence with a three-year probation, confirmed on September 25, 2024.

The Shizuoka Prefecture revoked the construction license of J-Planning Corporation because its business office location could not be confirmed, and no application was received within 30 days of public notice.

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction license of Mukaiichi Soken Co., Ltd. due to a criminal conviction of its director for a violation of the Penal Code, with the conviction finalized on January 12, 2022.

The Osaka Prefecture revoked the construction business license of Yokohama Kensetsu Co., Ltd. on April 23, 2026, due to the inability to confirm the company's office location and the lack of a response from the company after public notice.

Because the location of the construction company's office could not be confirmed, it was announced in the Kagoshima Prefecture Public Notice on March 17, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days of the announcement.

The Toyama Prefectural Government canceled the construction business license of Kokoro Corporation due to failure to respond after public notice regarding an unconfirmed office location, in accordance with Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on November 28, 2025.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 200,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on December 24, 2025.

The construction company failed to meet the standards for a specified office technician as stipulated in Article 15, Paragraph 2 of the Building Business Act, as the individual was not a full-time employee dedicated solely to duties. Additionally, the company submitted false information in permit applications under Articles 5 and 6 of the Building Business Act, claiming that the individual was a specified office technician and was not receiving salary from the company, despite not being a full-time employee. The company also filed a notification that it had abolished all permits for specified construction businesses, which is a violation of Article 12, Item 5 of the Building Business Act.

The representative director of Water System Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine under the Penal Code, and the execution of the sentence was completed on August 14, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Aiba Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Shizuoka District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 2, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

The officer of Kusakari Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to imprisonment or a more severe penalty on September 5, 2025, and it was found that less than five years have passed since the completion of the sentence or the person no longer being subject to the sentence. This corresponds to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the law.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 682 on January 23, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative director of Kunitada Denki Co., Ltd. submitted false qualification certificates during the construction business license application, claiming to possess the necessary qualifications for a designated technical engineer as required by the Building Business Act. Despite not having the qualifications, they presented certificates including a first-class architectural construction management engineer certificate and a first-class architect license, and obtained the license on November 6, 2015, through fraudulent means. The license was also renewed on November 6, 2020, under the same false pretenses. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on June 11, 2024.

It was found that the former director of Smileful Home Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on October 11, 2024. This corresponds to Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on November 9, 2023.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for a violation of Article 235 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on June 26, 2024.

Because the location of the office of Yugen Kaisha Sekigumi could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 690 dated January 16, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement.

Because the location of Suzuki Housing Equipment's sales office could not be determined, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 688 dated January 9, Reiwa 8, but no application was received from the company within 30 days from the date of the announcement.

The representative director of Shinmei Greenery Co., Ltd. was sentenced on November 17, 2025, to one year in prison with a three-year suspension for obstructing a public contract auction bid, and the sentence was finalized on December 2, 2025. As a result, they fall under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act. This also corresponds to Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 70,000 yen for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), with the sentence finalized on March 24, 2023. Additionally, the construction company submitted false information in the permit application under Article 5 of the Construction Business Act and in documents under Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the same law, and received an update of the permit under Article 3, Paragraph 3 of the Act.

The representative director of Tsuruoka Watabe Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment under Article 25, Paragraph 1, Item 14 of the Act on Waste Disposal and Public Cleaning (Act No. 137 of 1970), with the sentence finalized on December 26, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative director of PRESI Co., Ltd. was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension on December 21, 2023, by the Fukui District Court for violations of the Stimulant Control Act and the Narcotics and Psychotropics Control Act, and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company was dissolved by a resolution at the shareholders' meeting on April 30, 2025.

Kabushiki Kaisha Nitiro Kensetsu submitted a construction business license application containing false information regarding a significant matter, despite being subject to Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act due to the conviction of its officers for fines under the Penal Code. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative of Hayashi Ei Construction Co., Ltd. was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for crimes under Article 261 of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907) by the Tagawa Branch of the Fukuoka District Court, and the sentence was finalized on December 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Did not receive a notification from the construction company within 30 days after the announcement stating that the location of the business office or the construction company's whereabouts could not be confirmed.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a three-year suspension for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on December 17, 2022.

The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days.

Regarding Matsunaga Seitatoufusuden, the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on November 14, Reiwa 7, but no claims were made within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company ceased employing the persons responsible for business management and the technical officer at the office as defined under Article 7, Items 1 and 2 of the Construction Business Act as of August 31, Reiwa 7 (2025). These persons are no longer serving as full-time officers of the company or working exclusively at the company's office, and therefore the company no longer meets the licensing standards specified in Items 1 and 2 of the same article.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Official Gazette Regular Issue No. 662 on November 7, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 100,000 yen for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on September 7, 2022.

The representative director of Nakoshi Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for assault, and the sentence was finalized on March 5, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a four-year suspension for violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving Automobiles (Act No. 86 of 2013). The sentence was finalized on June 28, 2024.

The representative was convicted of violating the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1965) and received a sentence of 1 year and 6 months imprisonment with a 3-year probation from the Wakayama District Court, and the sentence has been finalized. This is recognized as corresponding to Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company’s management personnel responsible for business operations under Article 7, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act and the office technician specified in Article 7, Item 2 of the same Act died on August 11, 2025. They were no longer serving as full-time officers of the company, nor were they continuously present at the company’s office engaged solely in duties, thus no longer meeting the licensing standards stipulated in Articles 7, Items 1 and 2 of the Act.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 658 on October 24, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with a four-year suspension for a violation of Article 155, Paragraph 1 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on August 15, 2023.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, with a 3-year probation, for violations of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles. The sentence was finalized on July 5, 2023.

Because the location of Yamada Heavy Machinery's sales office could not be ascertained, it was announced in Shizuoka Prefecture Public Notice No. 663 dated October 10, 2025, but no application was received from the company within 30 days of the announcement.

The representative of Terada Souken was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison for violating the Stimulant Control Law, with a three-year probation, and the sentence was finalized on September 10, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving Motor Vehicles and the Road Traffic Act. He was sentenced to six months in prison with a three-year suspension, and the sentence was finalized on January 7, 2025.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months of imprisonment with a 4-year suspension for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 5, 2024.

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Gazette Regular Issue No. 649 dated September 22, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This corresponds to Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

The representative director of Takahashi Kisekigyo Co., Ltd. was found to fall under the disqualification reasons specified in Article 8, Items 7 and 12 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 2 years and 8 months of imprisonment for violating the Stimulant Control Act (Act No. 252 of 1951), and the sentence was finalized on April 4, 2023.

A former director of Yamashiro Kogyo received a summary order of a 100,000 yen fine on August 24, 2022, for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 10, 2022. As a result, during his tenure as director, he was subject to Item 12 of Article 8 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Act.

The representative director of Daisin Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for violating the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts, and the sentence was completed on May 7, 2022. This constitutes a disqualification under Article 8, Item 8 of the Building Business Act. The company did not submit the required notification under Article 11, Paragraph 5 of the same law, and falsely claimed that it did not meet disqualification criteria to obtain renewal of its construction business license by the deadline of April 13, 2023. These actions violate Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the same law.

Daiei Construction Co., Ltd. received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court Yokosuka Branch on October 24, 2024, at 4:00 PM, and the proceedings concluded on July 3, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Toki Construction Limited Company was dissolved by a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders on April 30, 2023, and completed liquidation on October 5, 2024. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

The construction company ceased to meet the licensing standards under the Construction Business Act because the person responsible for business management and the designated technical officer at the specified office resigned by April 16, Reiwa 7 (2025), and was no longer serving as a full-time director or working exclusively at the company's office. This constitutes a violation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Officers of Kyoji Realty Co., Ltd. were convicted of violating the Stimulant Control Law (Act No. 252 of 1951) and received a sentence of 1 year and 6 months in prison (with a 3-year probation) by the Kyoto District Court on April 23, 2025. The sentence was finalized on May 8, 2025. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

Regarding Tomonari Construction Co., Ltd., the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on August 15, 2025. No objections were received within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Iizawa Construction Co., Ltd. was subject to a bankruptcy proceeding decision by the Tachikawa Branch of the Tokyo District Court at 5:00 PM on November 22, 2022, which concluded on April 25, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Nihon Juken Co., Ltd. received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 31, 2022, and the proceedings concluded on August 31, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Sumile Corporation received a bankruptcy commencement order from the Yokohama District Court at 4:00 PM on February 26, Reiwa 6 (2024), and the discontinuation of the proceedings was finalized on June 20 of the same year. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

Yoshida Setsubi Co., Ltd. applied for renewal of its construction business license on November 30, 2023. Despite having completed the sentence for violating the Cannabis Control Law with a one-year imprisonment (probation for three years) on May 2, 2015, and having the probation revoked on December 5, 2017, and completing the sentence on January 3, 2020, the company submitted a sworn statement (Form No. 6) asserting it did not fall under disqualification requirements, and a record (Form No. 12) stating that the officer had not received any awards or punishments, and obtained a construction license on February 13, 2024, through fraudulent means. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Building Business Act, and is subject to license cancellation under the same provision.

Kabushiki Kaisha Chikutaku was dissolved by a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders on December 5, 2022, and completed liquidation on May 20, 2023. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 5 of the Construction Business Act.

A former director of Jintsu Corporation received a summary order of a 100,000 yen fine on August 24, 2022, for a violation of Article 208 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), which was finalized on September 10, 2022. During the period of being a director, this constituted a violation of Item 12, Article 8 of the Building Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Item 2, Paragraph 1, Article 29 of the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations.

The representative director of Kusano Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine on July 19, 2023, for violating the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts. This constitutes a violation of Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act.

The Osaka Prefectural Government announced in the Osaka Prefectural Gazette that the construction company's business office could not be identified, but no notification was received after 30 days.

A corporate officer was sentenced to imprisonment, and the sentence was finalized, which corresponds to the provisions of Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act. This falls under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to a fine of 300,000 yen for a violation of Article 204 of the Penal Code (Law No. 45 of 1907), and the sentence was finalized on January 6, 2024.

The director of the construction company was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison, with a 3-year probation, for violations of the Road Traffic Act and the Act on Penalties for Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Automobiles. The sentence was finalized on October 24, 2024.

The director of the construction company was convicted of violating the Act on Punishment of Acts Inflicting Injury or Death by Driving a Motor Vehicle (Act No. 86 of 2013) and the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960). He was sentenced to one year and two months in prison with a three-year probation, and the sentence was finalized on November 10, 2023.

The representative director of the construction company was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with a 3-year suspension for violating the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 105 of 1960), and the sentence was finalized on July 10, 2024.

An officer of Yoshikawa Setsubi Kogyo Co., Ltd. was sentenced to a fine for violating Article 208 of the Penal Code. As a result, the company falls under the disqualification criteria specified in Article 8, Item 12 of the Construction Business Act (for those among the officers who fall under Item 8). This constitutes grounds for license cancellation under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.