Enforcement record

License Revocation disclosure naming 松永製畳襖店

松永製畳襖店 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActFukuoka PrefectureGovernment disclosure25 December 2025

Action type

License Revocation

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Fukuoka Prefecture

Action date

25 December 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Fukuoka Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 松永製畳襖店

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 松永製畳襖店?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
松永製畳襖店Japanese only
Original: 松永製畳襖店
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
License Revocation
許可取消
Action date
25 December 2025
Issuing authority
Fukuoka Prefecture
福岡県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Regarding Matsunaga Seitatoufusuden, the location of the construction company's business office could not be confirmed, so it was announced in the Fukuoka Prefecture Public Notice on November 14, Reiwa 7, but no claims were made within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

松永製畳襖店については、建設業者の営業所の所在地が確知できないため、令和7年11月14日付の福岡県公報にその旨公告したが、30日を経過しても申し出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第29条の2第1項に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
福岡県北九州市小倉北区篠崎3-11-1
Representative
松永 英樹
Permit / registration number
福岡県知事(般—3)第101162号
Permitted business types
(般)内
Legal articles
建設業法第29条の2第1項
Cause of action
松永製畳襖店については、建設業者の営業所の所在地が確知できないため、令和7年11月14日付の福岡県公報にその旨公告したが、30日を経過しても申し出がなかった。このことは、建設業法第29条の2第1項に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1730

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

High

A regulator revoked an authorization or license required for the covered activity.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the affected business line and whether the company can legally perform the contemplated service.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.