Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 植村建設

植村建設 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOsaka PrefectureGovernment disclosure31 August 2024

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Osaka Prefecture

Action date

31 August 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Osaka Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 03:21 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 植村建設

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 植村建設?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
植村建設Japanese only
Original: 植村建設
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
31 August 2024
Issuing authority
Osaka Prefecture
大阪府
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The construction company violated the Building Business Act by assigning its dedicated technical staff, who are required to be stationed at its office as specified in Article 7, Item 2, and Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Act, as the chief technical engineer at the construction site for private projects in Higashi-Osaka City.

Show original Japanese text

当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事において、建設業法第7条第2号及び第26条第3項の規定に違反して、同号に規定する同社の営業所における専任の技術者である当該建設業者を、専任を要する主任技術者として工事現場に配置した。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
大阪府南河内郡太子町大字春日69番地
Representative
植村 俊和
Permit / registration number
大阪府知事(般-5)第130370号
Permitted business types
Building works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項柱書及び第2号
Cause of action
当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事において、建設業法第7条第2号及び第26条第3項の規定に違反して、同号に規定する同社の営業所における専任の技術者である当該建設業者を、専任を要する主任技術者として工事現場に配置した。
Other notes
本件処分に係る工事は同日に行われた営業停止処分と同一
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1191

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.