奏総合開発株式会社

The construction company violated Building Business Act Articles 7(2) and 26(3) by assigning a dedicated technical supervisor or chief engineer from its office to private construction projects in Osaka City, Takatsuki City, Hirakata City, Matsubara City, and Kobe City, where such personnel are required. The company assigned the same individual as the chief engineer at the construction sites, despite these assignments overlapping in time, which is against the regulations.

1(1) The construction company entered into a subcontract agreement with Company A for private construction in Hirakata City, exceeding the amount specified in the Cabinet Order under the Construction Business Act without the necessary permit under the classification listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2, violating Article 16, Item 1. (2) The company failed to assign qualified technicians to the site and subcontracted the main part of the construction work to Company A in violation of Article 22, Paragraph 1. 2(1) The company entered into a subcontract agreement with Company A for private construction in Takatsuki City, exceeding the amount specified in the Cabinet Order under the Construction Business Act without the necessary permit under the classification listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2. (2) The company contracted with Seiko Juken Co., Ltd., which operates construction business without the required permit under Article 3, Paragraph 1. (3) The company failed to confirm compliance with laws regarding worker placement for the scope of contracted construction work and subcontracted the main part of the work to Company A, violating Article 22, Paragraph 1. 3(1) The company entered into a subcontract agreement with Company A for private construction in Osaka City, exceeding the amount specified in the Cabinet Order under the Construction Business Act without the necessary permit under the classification listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2. (2) The company did not assign qualified technicians and subcontracted the main part of the work to Company A, violating Article 22, Paragraph 1. 4 The company in Matsubara City contracted with Martech Co., Ltd., a construction business other than the specific licensed contractor directly contracted by the client, for subcontracting exceeding the amount specified in the Cabinet Order under the Construction Business Act. 5(1) The company in Osaka City contracted with Company B for private construction exceeding the statutory threshold without the proper permit under the classification listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2, violating Article 16, Item 1. (2) The company failed to assign qualified technicians and subcontracted the main part of the work to Company B, violating Article 22, Paragraph 1. 6(1) The company in Kobe City contracted with Company B for private construction exceeding the statutory threshold without the proper permit under the classification listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2, violating Article 16, Item 1. (2) The company did not assign qualified technicians and subcontracted the main part of the work to Company B, violating Article 22, Paragraph 1. 7(1) The company in Osaka City contracted with Company C, which operates construction business without the required permit under Article 3, Paragraph 1, violating that article. (2) The company also contracted with C and others for work exceeding the statutory threshold without proper permits, violating Article 16, Items 1 or 2.