Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 樽見鉄道株式会社

樽見鉄道株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure6 December 2023

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

6 December 2023

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL: Recorded by RegBase
Entity match: Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation: Saved content requires review; Captured: May 17, 2026, 03:34 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Action summary

Company: 樽見鉄道株式会社Japanese only
Original: 樽見鉄道株式会社
Governing law: Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type: Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date: 6 December 2023
Issuing authority
Industry context: 鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On September 25 and 26, 2023, the Chubu Transportation Bureau conducted safety audits of Tarumi Railway Co., Ltd. (corporate number 4200001010040) headquartered in Motosu City, Gifu Prefecture. The audits revealed issues requiring improvement, including: (1) railway displacement inspections reaching standard limits as per Article 40 of the Railway Implementation Standards and related internal regulations; (2) exceeding standard values in gap inspections; (3) structural inspections revealing platforms obstructing building limits at some stations; (4) failure to conduct inspections of trackbeds, subgrades, joints, rail fittings, and guardrails as per internal regulations; and (5) some tunnel inspections not performed as required. The company is instructed to promptly take necessary measures based on Articles 37 of the Standards and Articles 3 and 4-2 of the internal regulations, establish a management system for railway facilities, and conduct education on maintenance. The company must report the measures taken by January 9, 2024.

Show original Japanese text

令和５年９月２５日及び９月２６日に、貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明したうえで、再発防止のための措置を講ずること。なお、講じた措置については、令和６年１月９日までに報告されたい。記１．土木施設実施基準（以下「実施基準」という。）第４０条で定める鉄道施設の定期検査について、以下の事実を確認した。（１）実施基準第４０条で定める線路検査整備内規（以下「整備内規」という。）第4-1条に規定する軌道変位検査について、整備基準値に達した箇所があること。（２）整備内規第6条に規定する遊間検査について、基準値を超過していたこと。（３）整備内規第13条に規定する構造物検査について、一部駅においてプラットホームが建築限界を支障していること。よって、実施基準第３７条並びに整備内規第3条及び第4-2条に基づき必要な措置を速やかに講ずるとともに、鉄道施設の管理体制を構築及び整備に関する教育を実施するなど、鉄道施設の維持管理を適切に実施すること。２．実施基準第４０条で定める鉄道施設の定期検査について、以下の事実を確認した。（１）整備内規第10条に規定する検査について、道床、路盤、継目、レール附属品、ガードレールについての検査を実施していないこと。（２）実施基準第４０条第４項に定めるトンネルの詳細検査について、一部トンネルの検査を実施していないこと。よって、実施基準第４０条及び整備内規第10条に基づき必要な措置を速やかに講ずるとともに、鉄道施設の管理体制の構築及び検査の必要性に対する教育を実施するなど、鉄道施設の検査及び維持管理を適切に実施すること。以上【中部運輸局】

Public documents and saved materials

View official publications and the available saved materials. Purchase a one-time evidence pack to download the compiled files.

Loading materials…

Business location and permit details

Business location address: 岐阜県本巣市
Legal articles: 鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page: https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=103

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

Recent records in the same industry

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.