Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 熊本電気鉄道株式会社

熊本電気鉄道株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure26 March 2024

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

26 March 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL: Recorded by RegBase
Entity match: Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation: Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Action summary

Company: 熊本電気鉄道株式会社Japanese only
Original: 熊本電気鉄道株式会社
Governing law: Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type: Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date: 26 March 2024
Issuing authority
Industry context: 鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between January 23 and 26, 2024, the Kyushu Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of Kumamoto Electric Railway Co., Ltd. (corporate number 1330001001517), headquartered in Kumamoto City, Kumamoto Prefecture. The audit revealed the following issues: 1. Obstructions to the building limits specified in Article 19 of the Track Maintenance Standards at Fushigami-mae and Kita-Kumamoto stations, requiring urgent corrective actions and revisions to maintenance standards and staff training to prevent recurrence. 2. Failure to perform ground resistance measurements on pole-mounted transformers and lightning arresters during the 2022 fiscal year's periodic inspections of high-voltage distribution lines, as well as overdue wireless communication equipment inspections from the 2020 fiscal year's safety equipment inspections, violating Articles 74 and 57 of the Electrical Equipment Standards and Safety Equipment Standards respectively. The company is instructed to verify that periodic inspections are conducted properly and timely, establish inspection checklists suited to each equipment type, and build a system to ensure inspections are reliably carried out. The company must investigate the root causes, including underlying factors, and implement measures to prevent recurrence. The report of corrective actions is due by April 25, 2024.

Show original Japanese text

令和６年１月２３日から２６日に貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。なお、改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明したうえで、再発防止のための措置を講ずること。また、講じた措置については、令和６年４月２５日までに報告されたい。記１．藤崎宮前駅及び北熊本駅のプラットホームについて、軌道整備実施基準第19条に規定する建築限界を支障していたことを確認した。よって、建築限界を支障する箇所については、早急に必要な措置を行うこと。また、再発を防止するために軌道整備実施基準の改正や必要な教育を実施するとともに、適切に維持管理するための体制の見直しを行うこと。２．電気設備実施基準第７４条に規定する電気設備の定期検査について、令和４年度の定期検査のうち、高圧配電線路の柱上変圧器及び避雷器の接地抵抗測定を実施していないことを確認した。また、運転保安設備実施基準第５７条に規定する運転保安設備の定期検査について、令和２年度の定期検査のうち、無線通信設備の検査が許容期間内に実施されていないことを確認した。よって、電気設備及び運転保安設備の定期検査が適切な方法及び期間に実施されているか確認し、これらの設備に応じた検査表を整備する等の必要な措置を講ずるとともに、検査を確実に実施するための体制を構築すること。【九州運輸局】

Public documents and saved materials

Source links and saved materials are available to purchasers of the evidence pack. You can also download the compiled records and available saved files.

Loading materials…

Business location and permit details

Business location address: 熊本県熊本市
Legal articles: 鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

Recent records in the same industry

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.