Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 田沢湖高原リフト株式会社

田沢湖高原リフト株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match19 March 2026

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

19 March 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 田沢湖高原リフト株式会社

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=6410001008532&limit=10

Action summary

Company
Original: 田沢湖高原リフト株式会社
Corporate Number: 6410001008532
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
19 March 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On January 28, 2026, the Tohoku Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of Tazawako Kogen Lift Co., Ltd. (corporate number 6410001008532), located in Senboku City, Akita Prefecture. The audit revealed that during temporary inspections (2) (conformity confirmation inspections) of their single-line automatic circulating and fixed circulating special ropeways, some inspection results were not recorded. The company was instructed to ensure that inspection results are reliably recorded in accordance with Article 8 of the relevant technical standards for ropeway facilities, and that only equipment actually inspected is documented. Given that regular inspections, checks, and maintenance are fundamental for ropeway facilities, the company must also review staffing and procedures for maintenance personnel to establish an appropriate maintenance system. The company is required to report on the implementation of these measures by April 20, 2026. This action is classified as administrative guidance under the Law on Technical Standards for Ropeway Facilities, with the case number 232, and the legal basis is the Ministerial Ordinance on Technical Standards for Ropeway Facilities. The address of the company is in Senboku City, Akita Prefecture.

Show original Japanese text

令和8年1月28日に貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、保安監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和8年4月20日までに報告されたい。 記 単線自動循環式特殊索道及び単線固定循環式特殊索道整備細則で規定する臨時検査(2)(適合確認検査)において、一部検査結果の記録が行われていなかったことを確認した。 よって、同整備細則第8条に基づき検査結果を確実に記録すること。また、記録については実際に検査を行った設備のみ記載すること。 なお、索道施設については、一定周期毎に検査、点検及び整備を行うことが基本となっていることから、それらの実施と記録を確実に行い、各項目が未実施とならないように管理していくことが必要であるため、索道施設の保守業務に携わる係員の人員配置や実施方法について検討を行い、索道施設の保守が適切に実施できる体制を構築すること。 以上 【東北運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
秋田県仙北市
Legal articles
索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=228

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-27T22:15:15.558+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-27T22:15:15.211+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "94cda975-cde0-4034-b855-356287ab5c31",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-tian-ze-hu-gao-yuan-rihuto-20260319",
    "company_name_original": "田沢湖高原リフト株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": "田沢湖高原リフト株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "6410001008532",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-tian-ze-hu-gao-yuan-rihuto-20260319",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=228",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-27T22:15:15.558+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:22:12.656+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-27T22:15:15.211+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-18T02:55:08.907Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.