Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 四国ケーブル株式会社

四国ケーブル株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure22 August 2022

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

22 August 2022

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Completed archive verified
Captured: May 16, 2026, 09:36 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.

Action summary

Company
四国ケーブル株式会社Japanese only
Original: 四国ケーブル株式会社
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
22 August 2022
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between July 21 and 22, 2022, the Shikoku Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of Shikoku Cable Co., Ltd. Following the audit, it was found that there are discrepancies between the latest construction plans submitted to the bureau and the actual cable car facilities, deficiencies in the maintenance regulations, and some inspection records are incomplete. The bureau has issued an administrative guidance instructing the company to take corrective actions on the following points: 1. Confirm and rectify the inconsistencies between the construction plans and the actual cable car facilities, and establish a system to properly manage the consistency. 2. Amend the maintenance regulations to include necessary provisions and establish proper management. 3. Correct the inspection records and ensure that inspection results are properly documented when inspections are conducted. The company is required to report the measures taken by September 22, 2022.

Show original Japanese text

令和4年7月21日から22日まで、貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和4年9月22日までに報告されたい。 記 1.雲辺寺ロープウェイについて、四国運輸局に提出されている最新の工事計画と実際の索道施設との整合性を確認したところ、相違している箇所が存在している事実を確認した。 よって、速やかに必要な手続きを行い、工事計画と索道施設を一致させること。 また、工事計画と索道施設の整合性を適切に管理する体制を構築すること。 2.雲辺寺ロープウェイについて、整備細則を確認したところ、必要な規定が定められていないなどの不備がある事実を確認した。 よって、速やかに整備細則を修正の上、必要な手続きを行うこと。また、整備細則を適切に管理する体制を構築すること。 3.雲辺寺ロープウェイについて、点検・検査結果の一部を記録していない事実を確認した。 よって、始業点検記録簿、各種検査記録簿を修正の上、整備細則に基づく点検・検査を実施した場合は、その結果を確実に記録すること。 【四国運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
香川県高松市
Legal articles
鉄道事業法索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=37

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-05-14T21:30:17.703+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-05-14T21:30:17.703+00:00
Archive captured
2026-05-16T12:36:38.264728+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "ac2e32d1-45fb-4e63-bfcb-fcb86bbbcf9e",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-si-guo-keburu-20220822",
    "company_name_original": "四国ケーブル株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 95,
    "method": "normalized_name_with_corporate_number",
    "method_label": "Normalized Japanese name matched to a company profile with Corporate Number",
    "notes": "Matched by normalized Japanese company name to an enriched company profile with a Corporate Number."
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-si-guo-keburu-20220822",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=37",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/d8d57875008bsi8o",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=37",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-05-16T12:36:38.264728+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-05-14T21:30:17.703+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T06:41:47.935+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-05-14T21:30:17.703+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-10-05T14:19:38.825Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.