Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 名古屋ガイドウェイバス株式会社

名古屋ガイドウェイバス株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match24 February 2026

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

24 February 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 名古屋ガイドウェイバス株式会社

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=3180001038952&limit=10

Action summary

Company
Original: 名古屋ガイドウェイバス株式会社
Corporate Number: 3180001038952
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
24 February 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On September 9 and 10, 2025, the Nagoya Guideway Bus Corporation underwent a safety audit conducted by the Chubu Transportation Bureau. The audit revealed issues requiring improvement, leading to an administrative guidance directive. The company is instructed to investigate the underlying causes, implement measures to prevent recurrence, and report the actions taken by March 24, 2026. Specific issues include: 1) exceeding displacement limits in guide rail inspections without taking necessary measures as per regulations; 2) exceeding inspection cycles for safety communication and station monitoring equipment; 3) failure to submit timetable change notifications for March 2024 and 2025. The guidance emphasizes proper management of track facilities, establishing systems for accurate maintenance oversight, and ensuring timely reporting of timetable modifications, all under the Railway Business Act and related regulations.

Show original Japanese text

令和7年9月9日(火)及び10日(水)に、貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明したうえで、再発防止のための措置を講ずること。 なお、講じた措置については、令和8年3月24日までに報告されたい。 記 1.軌道施設検査基準第10条で定める軌道の定期検査について、同基準別表-2で定める案内軌条状態検査の軌条の通りの変位が基準値を超過しているにもかかわらず、軌道施設整備心得第18条及び第19条で定める必要な措置を講じていないことを確認した。 よって、同検査基準及び同整備心得に基づき適切に案内軌条の管理を行えるよう、必要な措置を講ずること。 2.軌道施設整備心得第10条に基づく軌道施設検査基準別表-1に規定する諸設備の保安通信設備のうち放送装置及び業務用電話並びに総合管理設備のうち駅監視設備の検査について、同検査基準第12条及び13条に規定する検査周期を超過していたことを確認した。 よって、軌道施設の検査が確実に行われるよう必要な措置を講ずるとともに、軌道施設に係る保守管理の現状を適確に把握できる仕組みを構築するなど、軌道施設の管理体制の見直しを図ること。 3.軌道法施行規則第24条第3項に基づく発着時刻の変更届出について、届出の対象となる令和6年3月及び令和7年3月に行われたダイヤ改正の内容が、届出されていないことを確認した。 よって、発着時刻の変更届出が確実に行われるよう必要な措置を講ずること。 以上 【中部運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
愛知県名古屋市
Legal articles
軌道法軌道運転規則
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=221

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-27T22:15:26.25+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-27T22:15:25.894+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "ffdcef6b-5b39-4bf0-8b13-76e0f2ff4aa8",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-ming-gu-wu-gaidoueibasu-20260224",
    "company_name_original": "名古屋ガイドウェイバス株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": "名古屋ガイドウェイバス株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "3180001038952",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-ming-gu-wu-gaidoueibasu-20260224",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=221",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-27T22:15:26.25+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:22:20.096+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-27T22:15:25.894+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-18T06:13:01.130Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.