Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 関東自動車株式会社

関東自動車株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure14 June 2023

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

14 June 2023

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Completed archive verified
Captured: May 17, 2026, 03:33 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E9%96%A2%E6%9D%B1%E8%87%AA%E5%8B%95%E8%BB%8A%E6%A0%AA%E5%BC%8F%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE&limit=10

Action summary

Company
関東自動車株式会社Japanese only
Original: 関東自動車株式会社
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
14 June 2023
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On May 10-11, 2023, the Kanto Transportation Bureau conducted a safety audit of Kanto Motor Corporation. The audit revealed that the inspection cycle for the frames and connection devices of carriers exceeded the five-year interval specified in the Ministerial Ordinance on Technical Standards for Ropeway Facilities, as amended by the Notification on the Interpretation and Application of the Technical Standards (October 15, 1996, No. 82 of the Railway Technical Department). The company is instructed to ensure that inspections are carried out in accordance with the prescribed cycle to prevent recurrence, including investigation of underlying causes. The company must report the measures taken by July 13, 2023.

Show original Japanese text

令和5年5月10日から5月11日まで、貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和5年7月13日までに報告されたい。 記 以下の事項の改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明した上で、再発防止のための措置を講ずること。 1.搬器の走行部のフレーム、接続装置の検査において、平成13年5月28日付け国鉄技第29号「「「索道施設に関する技術上の基準の細目を定める告示の一部を改正する告示」の定めに伴う解釈・運用について」(平成8年10月15日付け鉄技第82号)の一部改正について」(以下、「同通達」という。)において5年ごとに実施することとされている検査周期を超過していることを確認した。 よって、搬器の走行部のフレーム、接続装置の検査について、同通達に基づく検査周期を超過しないよう確実に実施すること。 【関東運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
栃木県宇都宮市
Legal articles
索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=91

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-05-14T21:28:36.131+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-05-14T21:28:36.131+00:00
Archive captured
2026-05-16T18:33:26.934508+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "f05fe361-7d4f-4536-9a87-c21b9830ba68",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-guan-dong-zi-dong-che-20230614",
    "company_name_original": "関東自動車株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 95,
    "method": "normalized_name_with_corporate_number",
    "method_label": "Normalized Japanese name matched to a company profile with Corporate Number",
    "notes": "Matched by normalized Japanese company name to an enriched company profile with a Corporate Number."
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-guan-dong-zi-dong-che-20230614",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=91",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/2b8545237d8omrj2",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=91",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-05-16T18:33:26.934508+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-05-14T21:28:36.131+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T06:52:15.456+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-05-14T21:28:36.131+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T10:05:47.822Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.