Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 高山市

高山市 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match25 March 2025

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

25 March 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 高山市

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=6000020212032&limit=10

Action summary

Company
高山市Japanese original
Original: 高山市
Corporate Number: 6000020212032
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
25 March 2025
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between February 12 and 14, 2025, the Chubu Transportation Bureau conducted safety audits of Takayama City’s cable car facilities. The audit identified deficiencies, including incomplete electrical inspections of the cable car facilities' tension and safety equipment, specifically the insulation resistance and grounding resistance measurements, as stipulated in Article 5 of the Takayama Citizens Ski Resort Special Cable Car Regulations. Additionally, the Yuzan First Quad Lift’s cable car facility was modified without following the procedures prescribed under Article 12 of the Railway Business Act, which is applicable by analogy under Article 38 of the same law. Takayama City is instructed to promptly conduct the missing inspections, improve the maintenance management system of the cable car facilities to ensure proper inspections, and carry out the necessary legal procedures for the modifications. The city must report the corrective actions taken by April 25, 2025. This guidance is issued by the Chubu Transportation Bureau.

Show original Japanese text

令和7年2月12日(水)から14日(金)まで、貴市に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明したうえで、再発防止のための措置を講ずること。 なお、講じた措置については、令和7年4月25日までに報告されたい。 記 1.索道施設の電気設備の検査について、高山市民スキー場単線自動循環式特殊索道整備細則第5条で規定する臨時検査(2)の一部の検査項目(緊張設備及び保安設備全般にかかる「絶縁抵抗の良否(測定)」並びに原動設備及び保安設備全般の「接地抵抗の良否(測定)」)を実施していないことを確認した。 よって、速やかに同設備の検査を実施するとともに、高山市民スキー場単線自動循環式特殊索道整備細則第5条に基づき適切に検査を実施できるよう、索道施設の維持管理する体制を改善すること。 2.索道施設の緊張設備について、鉄道事業法第38条において準用する同法第12条に基づく手続きを行っていないにもかかわらず、位山第1クワッドリフトの索道施設が変更されていることを確認した。 よって、速やかに鉄道事業法第38条において準用する同法第12条に基づく手続きを行うとともに、同種事案が再び発生することがないよう適切な措置を講ずること。 以上 【中部運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
岐阜県高山市
Legal articles
鉄道事業法索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=189

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-27T22:16:22.569+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-27T22:16:22.21+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "afd585e0-8ed3-4f83-b9eb-644cdea9a46f",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-gao-shan-shi-20250325",
    "company_name_original": "高山市",
    "company_name_registry": "高山市",
    "corporate_number": "6000020212032",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-gao-shan-shi-20250325",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=189",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-27T22:16:22.569+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:12:40.287+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-27T22:16:22.21+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-19T04:22:06.276Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.