Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 東急電鉄株式会社

東急電鉄株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure30 October 2024

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

30 October 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Completed archive verified
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 10:01 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%9D%B1%E6%80%A5%E9%9B%BB%E9%89%84%E6%A0%AA%E5%BC%8F%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE&limit=10

Action summary

Company
東急電鉄株式会社Japanese only
Original: 東急電鉄株式会社
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
30 October 2024
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On October 30, 2024, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) issued administrative guidance to Tokyu Corporation (東急電鉄株式会社) following an audit related to safety inspections of railway vehicles. During the process of emergency inspection of railway wheel axles initiated on September 12, 2024, reports emerged that Sogo Vehicle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (株式会社総合車両製作所) had altered work records improperly. Such record modifications undermine the safety assurance system and are unacceptable. The audit revealed the following facts: 1. Actual conditions regarding regulations: - The contractor performed wheel axle pressing operations without adhering to internal safety management regulations. - The contractor lacked regulations on pressing force values and procedures for deviations, instead verifying or calculating pressing force values independently. 2. Actual conditions at the site: - Use of deviated wheel axles was orally and tacitly accepted over a long period. - The contractor believed deviations in pressing force were acceptable. 3. Staff knowledge and training: - No systematic education on wheel axle assembly was provided. 4. Record modification practices: - Record modifications were possible and had been carried out. - Such modifications were orally and tacitly accepted. 5. Management practices: - Supervisors did not verify the appropriateness of wheel axle usage. These facts violate the Railway Business Act and the Ministerial Ordinance on Technical Standards for Railways. Based on these findings, MLIT instructed Tokyu Corporation to take the following corrective actions: (1) Develop internal regulations for pressing operations. (2) Improve management of staff education and training. (3) Establish systems to prevent record modifications, including internal audits. (4) Review safety management systems across other operations. Reporting deadlines are January 31, 2025, for actions (1)–(3), and March 31, 2025, for action (4).

Show original Japanese text

令和6年9月12日から全国の鉄軌道事業者に対し指示した「鉄道車両における 輪軸の緊急点検」の過程において、貴社及び株式会社総合車両製作所より株式会社 総合車両製作所による作業記録の書き換えなどの不適切事案の報告があった。こう した作業記録の書き換えについては、輸送の安全確保の仕組みを根底から覆す行為 であり、到底容認できるものではないことから、国土交通省において鉄道事業法に 基づく保安監査を実施したところ、「1.確認された事実関係」に示す事実が明らか となったことから、速やかに「2.講ずべき措置」に示す改善措置を講ずるよう指 示する。 1. 確認された事実関係 (ア) 規程類に関する実態 ・輪軸の圧入作業を安全管理規程類(業務の受委託に関する事項)に基づかず、 委託していた。 ・委託先において、圧入力値に関する規定や、規定された数値を逸脱した場合の 取扱い等についての規程類がなく、事業者から図面を入手して圧入力値を確認 したり、図面がない場合は自ら圧入力値を算出したりしていた (イ) 現場における圧入作業の実態 ・委託先において、規定等から逸脱した輪軸をそのまま使用することが長く職場 内で口頭で漫然と踏襲されていた。 ・委託先において、圧入力値の基準範囲を逸脱しても問題はないと認識していた。 (ウ)係員の知識と教育の実態 ・委託先において、輪軸組立作業の知識に関する教育が体系的に行われていなか った。 (エ)作業記録の書き換えの実態 ・委託先において、作業記録の書き換えが可能であり実際に書き換えていた。 ・委託先において、作業記録の書き換えは職場内で口頭で漫然と踏襲されていた。 (オ)作業の管理の実態 ・管理的立場にいる者が、輪軸の使用の可否に係る判断に必要な確認を行ってい なかった。 以上の確認された事実関係は、鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令第87条 第4項及び鉄道事業法第18条の3第2項に抵触する。 2. 東急電鉄株式会社が講ずべき措置 「2.確認された事実関係」を踏まえ、東急電鉄株式会社が講ずべき措置を以 下に記載する。 (1) 規程類の整備 ・圧入作業に関する社内規程類を整備すること。 ・委託先の規程類ひいては実作業に自社の社内規程類が反映されるよう、適切に 管理できる体制に改善すること。 (2) 教育体制の改善 ・委託先の圧入作業に関する教育及び訓練の管理ができるよう改善すること。 (3) 作業記録の書き換えの防止 ・委託先と協議のもと、作業記録の書き換えが容易に行われない仕組みを確立す るとともに、貴社において必要な確認を行うこと。 ・委託先における内部監査等の仕組みを検証し、不適切な取扱いが見過ごされな い体制を整備すること。 (4) 安全管理体制の点検と見直し ・同様の問題が他の作業や部門で無いか点検し、必要な見直しを行うこと。 3. 報告期限 2.(1)~(4)について、措置を講じ、又は、措置を講ずるための計画を策 定し、2.(1)~(3)については、令和7年1月31日までに、2.(4)に ついては、令和7年3月31日までに報告すること。 【鉄道局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
東京都渋谷区
Legal articles
鉄道事業法鉄道に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=154
PDF
https://www.mlit.go.jp/tetudo/content/001840488.pdf

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
Original source (Japanese)Open the official decision document / PDFOpen preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-05-14T21:26:56.729+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-05-14T21:26:56.729+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-13T01:01:19.381837+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "3b82abbd-8073-4d87-88c8-32e7696d9060",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-dong-ji-dian-tie-20241030",
    "company_name_original": "東急電鉄株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 95,
    "method": "normalized_name_with_corporate_number",
    "method_label": "Normalized Japanese name matched to a company profile with Corporate Number",
    "notes": "Matched by normalized Japanese company name to an enriched company profile with a Corporate Number."
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-dong-ji-dian-tie-20241030",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=154",
    "officialDocumentUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/tetudo/content/001840488.pdf",
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/01c2619aabiin30b",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/tetudo/content/001840488.pdf",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-13T01:01:19.381837+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-05-14T21:26:56.729+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:02:40.528+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-05-14T21:26:56.729+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T15:43:36.134Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.