Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 池田町

池田町 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match30 March 2026

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

30 March 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 池田町

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=2000020183822&limit=10

Action summary

Company
池田町Japanese original
Original: 池田町
Corporate Number: 2000020183822
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
30 March 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On February 18, 2026, the Chubu Transportation Bureau performed a safety audit of Ikeda Town, Fukui Prefecture. The audit revealed that certain inspection items for the safety communication, safety, and electrical equipment of ropeway facilities were not carried out as specified in Article 5 of the Special Regulations for the Construction of Single-Track Fixed Circular Ropeways. The town was instructed to promptly conduct the necessary inspections and improve the maintenance management system to ensure proper inspections in accordance with the regulations. Additionally, it was confirmed that the New Ho Romance Lift ropeway facility was modified without following the procedures stipulated in Article 12 of the Railway Business Act, which is applied mutatis mutandis under Article 38 of the same Act. The town was instructed to promptly undertake the necessary procedures and implement measures to prevent recurrence of such issues. The town is required to report the corrective actions taken by April 30, 2026. This enforcement action was issued by the Chubu Transportation Bureau.

Show original Japanese text

令和8年2月18日(水)に、貴町に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、発生した背後要因を含めて原因を究明したうえで、再発防止のための措置を講ずること。 なお、講じた措置については、令和8年4月30日までに報告されたい。 記 1.索道施設の保安通信設備、その他の保安設備及び電気設備の検査について、単線固定循環式特殊索道整備細則第5条で定める臨時検査(2)の一部の検査項目を実施していないことを確認した。 よって、速やかに同設備の検査を実施するとともに、同整備細則第5条に基づき適切に検査を実施できるよう、索道施設の維持管理する体制を改善すること。 2.索道施設の保安設備について、鉄道事業法第38条において準用する同法第12条に基づく手続きを行っていないにもかかわらず、新保ロマンスリフトの索道施設が変更されていることを確認した。 よって、速やかに鉄道事業法第38条において準用する同法第12条に基づく手続きを行うとともに、同種事案が再び発生することがないよう適切な措置を講ずること。 以上 【中部運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
福井県今立郡池田町
Legal articles
鉄道事業法索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=244

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-27T22:15:02.128+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-27T22:15:01.759+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "170c389f-5cf7-4174-866a-b8990c02f2f1",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-chi-tian-ting-20260330",
    "company_name_original": "池田町",
    "company_name_registry": "池田町",
    "corporate_number": "2000020183822",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-chi-tian-ting-20260330",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=244",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-27T22:15:02.128+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:22:18.608+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-27T22:15:01.759+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-18T12:14:18.099Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.