Enforcement record

Business Suspension disclosure naming 中居 綾

中居 綾 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActTokyo Metropolitan GovernmentGovernment disclosure8 September 2025

Action type

Business Suspension

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Action date

8 September 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 中居 綾

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 中居 綾?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
中居 綾Japanese only
Original: 中居 綾
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Business Suspension
営業停止
Action date
8 September 2025
Issuing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
東京都
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Aya Nakai engaged in private construction work within Tokyo exceeding the amount specified in the Construction Business Act Enforcement Order without holding the permit required by Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act. This constitutes a violation of Article 28, Paragraph 2, Item 2 and Paragraph 3 of the same Act.

Show original Japanese text

中居 綾は、建設業法第3条第1項の許可を有していないにもかかわらず、東京都内の民間工事において、建設業法施行令第1条の2第1項に規定されている金額以上の工事を請け負った。 このことが、建設業法第28条第2項第2号及び同条第3項に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
神奈川県横浜市港北区大曽根1-5-2-15
Representative
中居 綾
Permit / registration number
許可なし
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第3項(同条第2項第2号該当)
Cause of action
中居 綾は、建設業法第3条第1項の許可を有していないにもかかわらず、東京都内の民間工事において、建設業法施行令第1条の2第1項に規定されている金額以上の工事を請け負った。 このことが、建設業法第28条第2項第2号及び同条第3項に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1624

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.