Enforcement record

License Revocation disclosure naming 小杉建築

小杉建築 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActKanagawa PrefectureGovernment disclosure26 November 2025

Action type

License Revocation

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Kanagawa Prefecture

Action date

26 November 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Kanagawa Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 小杉建築

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 小杉建築?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
小杉建築Japanese only
Original: 小杉建築
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
License Revocation
許可取消
Action date
26 November 2025
Issuing authority
Kanagawa Prefecture
神奈川県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Because the location of the business office could not be confirmed, a public notice was issued in Kanagawa Prefecture Public Notice No. 658 on October 24, Reiwa 7, but no application was received from the construction company within 30 days. This constitutes a violation of Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

営業所の所在地を確知できないため、令和7年10月24日付け神奈川県公報定期第658号にて公告したが、30日経過しても当該建設業者から申出がなかった。 このことは、建設業法第29条の2第1項に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
神奈川県座間市相模が丘5-43-35
Representative
小杉 裕和
Permit / registration number
神奈川県知事許可(般-3)第33379号
Permitted business types
Building works
Legal articles
建設業法第29条の2第1項該当
Cause of action
営業所の所在地を確知できないため、令和7年10月24日付け神奈川県公報定期第658号にて公告したが、30日経過しても当該建設業者から申出がなかった。 このことは、建設業法第29条の2第1項に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1670

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

High

A regulator revoked an authorization or license required for the covered activity.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the affected business line and whether the company can legally perform the contemplated service.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.