Enforcement record

Business Suspension disclosure naming WOOD PLACE

WOOD PLACE (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOsaka PrefectureGovernment disclosure28 November 2025

Action type

Business Suspension

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Osaka Prefecture

Action date

28 November 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Osaka Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: WOOD PLACE

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for WOOD PLACE?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
WOOD PLACEJapanese only
Original: WOOD PLACE
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Business Suspension
営業停止
Action date
28 November 2025
Issuing authority
Osaka Prefecture
大阪府
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The person engaged in the construction industry contracted a construction project in Osaka City with a contract amount exceeding the amount specified in the Enforcement Order of the Construction Business Act without obtaining the required permit, in violation of Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

当該建設業を営む者は、大阪市内の民間発注の工事において、建設業法第3条第1項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで請負代金が建設業法施行令第1条の2に定める金額以上となる建設工事を請け負った。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
大阪府大阪市東住吉区湯里1丁目14-5-501
Representative
佐野 大
Permit / registration number
なし
Permitted business types
なし
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第3項
Cause of action
当該建設業を営む者は、大阪市内の民間発注の工事において、建設業法第3条第1項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで請負代金が建設業法施行令第1条の2に定める金額以上となる建設工事を請け負った。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1693

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.