Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 株式会社たかべホームズ

株式会社たかべホームズ (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActHyogo PrefectureGovernment disclosure21 March 2025

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Hyogo Prefecture

Action date

21 March 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Hyogo Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社たかべホームズ

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社たかべホームズ?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社たかべホームズJapanese only
Original: 株式会社たかべホームズ
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
21 March 2025
Issuing authority
Hyogo Prefecture
兵庫県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Takabe Homes Co., Ltd. did not prepare a written document as required by Article 19, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act when concluding and executing a contract for the (provisional name) O residence exterior wall painting work. This constitutes a violation of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the same Act.

Show original Japanese text

株式会社たかべホームズは、「(仮称)О邸外壁塗装工事」にかかる請負契約を 締結して施工するにあたり、建設業法第19条第1項に規定する書面を作成しなかった。このことは建設業法第28条第1項に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
兵庫県洲本市桑間578-3
Representative
髙部 日出雄
Permit / registration number
兵庫県知事(般-3)第801617号
Permitted business types
Building works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項
Cause of action
株式会社たかべホームズは、「(仮称)О邸外壁塗装工事」にかかる請負契約を 締結して施工するにあたり、建設業法第19条第1項に規定する書面を作成しなかった。このことは建設業法第28条第1項に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1368

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.