Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 恒栄建装

恒栄建装 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOsaka PrefectureGovernment disclosure4 April 2024

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Osaka Prefecture

Action date

4 April 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Osaka Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 05:11 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 恒栄建装

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 恒栄建装?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
恒栄建装Japanese only
Original: 恒栄建装
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
4 April 2024
Issuing authority
Osaka Prefecture
大阪府
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The construction company, in multiple projects ordered by Osaka City, subcontracted the construction work it had undertaken to another construction business, but violated the provisions of Article 24-8, Paragraph 2 of the Building Business Act by not notifying the prime contractor of the subcontracting.

Show original Japanese text

当該建設業者は、大阪市発注の複数の工事において、その請け負った建設工事を他の建設業を営む者に請け負わせたにも関わらず、建設業法第24条の8第2項の規定に違反し、発注者から直接その工事を請け負った建設業者に対し、再下請負の通知を行わなかった。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
大阪府堺市中区八田西町二丁21番26号
Representative
品川 貴光
Permit / registration number
大阪府知事(般-1)第152404号
Permitted business types
Interior finishing works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項柱書及び同項第2号
Cause of action
当該建設業者は、大阪市発注の複数の工事において、その請け負った建設工事を他の建設業を営む者に請け負わせたにも関わらず、建設業法第24条の8第2項の規定に違反し、発注者から直接その工事を請け負った建設業者に対し、再下請負の通知を行わなかった。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=147

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.