Enforcement record

License Revocation disclosure naming 高野建設

高野建設 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOsaka PrefectureGovernment disclosure19 August 2021

Action type

License Revocation

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Osaka Prefecture

Action date

19 August 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Osaka Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 高野建設

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 高野建設?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
高野建設Japanese only
Original: 高野建設
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
License Revocation
許可取消
Action date
19 August 2021
Issuing authority
Osaka Prefecture
大阪府
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Takano Construction's license was canceled by Osaka Prefecture under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. The reason for the cancellation was that the company was convicted of violating the Road Traffic Act (Law No. 105 of 1960), resulting in an 8-month prison sentence with a 3-year suspended sentence, which was finalized on November 21, 2020. The license was officially revoked on August 19, 2021.

Show original Japanese text

当該建設業者が、道路交通法(昭和35年法律第105号)違反により、懲役8月執行猶予3年の刑に処せられ、令和2年11月21日にその刑が確定した。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
大阪府枚方市西禁野二丁目5番12号
Representative
高野 和広
Permit / registration number
大阪府知事(般-29)第137748号
Permitted business types
Building works
Legal articles
建設業法第29条第1項第2号
Cause of action
当該建設業者が、道路交通法(昭和35年法律第105号)違反により、懲役8月執行猶予3年の刑に処せられ、令和2年11月21日にその刑が確定した。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=175

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

High

A regulator revoked an authorization or license required for the covered activity.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the affected business line and whether the company can legally perform the contemplated service.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.