Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 有限会社髙栄建興

有限会社髙栄建興 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActTokyo Metropolitan GovernmentGovernment disclosure28 March 2023

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Action date

28 March 2023

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming 有限会社髙栄建興

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%9C%89%E9%99%90%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE%E9%AB%99%E6%A0%84%E5%BB%BA%E8%88%88&limit=10

Action summary

Company
有限会社髙栄建興Japanese only
Original: 有限会社髙栄建興
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
28 March 2023
Issuing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
東京都
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Kōei Kenkō Co., Ltd. was a subcontractor for the 'Imaigawa Repair Work (Part 5)' in Hodogaya Ward, Yokohama City. On December 11, 2020, an employee engaged in work at the site fell from a drag shovel into a river and sustained injuries requiring more than four days of leave. Because the injury required over four days of leave, the company was obligated to promptly submit a Worker Injury and Illness Report to the Labor Standards Inspection Office. However, the report was not submitted until October 20, 2021. This failure to report violated Article 100, Paragraph 1 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act and Article 97, Paragraph 1 of the Industrial Safety and Health Regulations (Ministry of Labour Ordinance No. 32 of 1972). As a result, the company and its representative were fined. The violation falls under Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Construction Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

有限会社髙栄建興は、横浜市保土ヶ谷区における「今井川改修工事(その5)」の下請会社であった。 令和2年12 月11 日、同工事現場において、作業に従事していた同社の労働者がドラグショベルから 河川に転落し、4日以上の休業を要する傷害を負った。 労働者が休業4日以上の負傷をしたのであるから、遅滞なく、労働者死傷病報告書を所轄労働基準監 督署長に提出しなければならないのに、令和3年10 月20 日まで同報告書を提出しなかった。 以上のことが、労働安全衛生法第100 条第1 項及び労働安全衛生規則(昭和47 年労働省令第32 号) 第97 条第1項に違反し、有限会社髙栄建興及び同社代表取締役が罰金刑に処せられた。 このことが、法第28 条第1項第3号に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
東京都八王子市並木町36番23号
Representative
髙橋 和之
Permit / registration number
東京都知事(般-3)第153546 号
Permitted business types
土・と・石・鋼・舗・し・水
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項3号
Cause of action
有限会社髙栄建興は、横浜市保土ヶ谷区における「今井川改修工事(その5)」の下請会社であった。 令和2年12 月11 日、同工事現場において、作業に従事していた同社の労働者がドラグショベルから 河川に転落し、4日以上の休業を要する傷害を負った。 労働者が休業4日以上の負傷をしたのであるから、遅滞なく、労働者死傷病報告書を所轄労働基準監 督署長に提出しなければならないのに、令和3年10 月20 日まで同報告書を提出しなかった。 以上のことが、労働安全衛生法第100 条第1 項及び労働安全衛生規則(昭和47 年労働省令第32 号) 第97 条第1項に違反し、有限会社髙栄建興及び同社代表取締役が罰金刑に処せられた。 このことが、法第28 条第1項第3号に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=798

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Tokyo Metropolitan Government source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T08:52:32.384+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "cc5f716b-2bdb-47c5-8a2d-f9dbf040c1c9",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-gao-rong-jian-xing-20230328",
    "company_name_original": "有限会社髙栄建興",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "東京都",
      "en": "Tokyo Metropolitan Government"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 0,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_name_mismatch",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_name_mismatch",
    "notes": "複数候補または識別情報の矛盾があるため、対象法人を確定していません(source_corporate_number_name_mismatch)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-gao-rong-jian-xing-20230328",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=798",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T14:50:30.715+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:52:32.384+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-04T16:26:37.165Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.