Enforcement record

Directive against 冨田電気通信株式会社

冨田電気通信株式会社 (Construction Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Construction Business ActKyoto PrefectureConfirmed entity match14 February 2025

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Kyoto Prefecture

Action date

14 February 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 冨田電気通信株式会社

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=8130001042830&limit=10

Action summary

Company
Original: 冨田電気通信株式会社
Corporate Number: 8130001042830
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
14 February 2025
Issuing authority
Kyoto Prefecture
京都府
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Tomita Electric Communications Co., Ltd. submitted a management review application with a review date of February 28, 2023, despite having received a suspension of business order under Article 28, Paragraph 3 of the Construction Business Act (applicable to Item 2 of that paragraph) on March 30, 2022. The application included false information in item 58 (whether there was a suspension of business). Based on the resulting notification obtained from this application, the company applied for the construction bid qualification for Kyoto Prefecture for fiscal year 2024, and Kyoto Prefecture used this notification for qualification screening. This constitutes a violation of Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act and is subject to administrative guidance under the same article.

Show original Japanese text

冨田電気通信株式会社は、令和5年2月28日を審査基準日とする経営事項審査申請において、令和4年3月30日に建設業法第28条第3項(同項第2号該当)に基づく営業停止処分を受けたにもかかわらず、当該申請に係る申請書の項番58(営業停止処分の有無)について事実と異なる記載をし、当該申請に基づき得られた結果通知書をもって、令和6年度の京都府建設工事競争入札参加資格申請を行い、京都府が当該結果通知書を資格審査に用いた。 このことは建設業法第28条第1項第2号に該当し、同条第1項の規定により指 示処分の対象となる。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
京都府京丹後市弥栄町和田野1321-3
Representative
冨田 耕二
Permit / registration number
京都府知事許可(特・般-3)第30680号
Permitted business types
Electrical works, Pipe works, Telecommunications works, Fire protection facilities works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項本文(同項第2号該当)
Cause of action
冨田電気通信株式会社は、令和5年2月28日を審査基準日とする経営事項審査申請において、令和4年3月30日に建設業法第28条第3項(同項第2号該当)に基づく営業停止処分を受けたにもかかわらず、当該申請に係る申請書の項番58(営業停止処分の有無)について事実と異なる記載をし、当該申請に基づき得られた結果通知書をもって、令和6年度の京都府建設工事競争入札参加資格申請を行い、京都府が当該結果通知書を資格審査に用いた。 このことは建設業法第28条第1項第2号に該当し、同条第1項の規定により指 示処分の対象となる。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1467

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Kyoto Prefecture source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-24T19:20:49.253+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-24T19:20:48.905+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "af2fb5eb-e732-4831-96a4-3ac3ea2893af",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-fu-tian-dian-qi-tong-xin-20250214",
    "company_name_original": "冨田電気通信株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": "冨田電気通信株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "8130001042830",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "京都府",
      "en": "Kyoto Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-fu-tian-dian-qi-tong-xin-20250214",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1467",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-24T19:20:49.253+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-05-01T07:52:03.527+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-24T19:20:48.905+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-25T00:16:19.763Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.