Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 檜枝岐村

檜枝岐村 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match12 March 2025

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

12 March 2025

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 檜枝岐村

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 檜枝岐村

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=1000020073644&limit=10

Action summary

Company
檜枝岐村Japanese original
Original: 檜枝岐村
Corporate Number: 1000020073644
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
12 March 2025
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On January 23, 2025, a safety audit was conducted on the village of Hinoe-e, Fukushima Prefecture. The audit revealed deficiencies requiring corrective action. The village was instructed to report on the measures taken by April 14, 2025. The corrective actions include investigating the root causes of the issues, implementing necessary improvements to prevent recurrence, and ensuring the safety of transportation operations. Specifically, it was confirmed that inspections mandated by Article 42 of the Ministerial Ordinance concerning technical standards for cable car facilities had not been conducted monthly due to a lack of understanding by the safety supervisor and technical manager. The village is required to promptly conduct the necessary inspections, provide education to relevant personnel, and properly maintain and manage the cable car facilities to ensure safety and compliance.

Show original Japanese text

令和7年1月23日に貴村に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、保安監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和7年4月14日までに報告されたい。 なお、改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、背後要因を含め当該事象が発生した原因を究明したうえで、再発防止に必要な改善策を策定するとともに、輸送の安全に係る業務が確実に実施できるよう留意すること。 記 1.索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令第42条に規定する検査について、安全統括管理者及び索道技術管理者の理解不足から1月ごとに行う検査を実施していないことを確認した。 よって、同省令第42条に基づき必要な検査を速やかに実施するとともに、安全統括管理者及び索道技術管理者に対する教育を実施のうえ、係員に必要な教育・訓練を行い、適切に索道施設を維持し管理すること。 以上 【東北運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
福島県南会津郡檜枝岐村
Legal articles
索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=177

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-17T09:22:18.371+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T09:22:18.301+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-11T12:33:37.21751+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "9cebbb67-f92e-47fd-a051-6ae148ee25c6",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/9cebbb67-f92e-47fd-a051-6ae148ee25c6",
    "company_name_original": "檜枝岐村",
    "company_name_registry": "檜枝岐村",
    "corporate_number": "1000020073644",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/9cebbb67-f92e-47fd-a051-6ae148ee25c6",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=177",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/115a0c132fgcfl7q",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=177",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-11T12:33:37.21751+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T09:22:18.371+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T13:01:42.279+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:22:18.301+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T18:06:16.498Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.