Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 一般財団法人若桜町観光開発事業団

一般財団法人若桜町観光開発事業団 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure28 May 2021

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

28 May 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL: Recorded by RegBase
Entity match: Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation: Queued for preservation; Captured: May 16, 2026, 09:34 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Review the details and materials for this record to see the available official sources and preserved files before purchasing.

Save a record of your review

Keep the records and their sources together

Review what is included, then save the report and CSV in an evidence ZIP for internal sharing. Available source files vary by target.

View materials See a sample (Japanese)

See the included records, sources, and available files on the next page.

Action summary

Company: 一般財団法人若桜町観光開発事業団Japanese only
Original: 一般財団法人若桜町観光開発事業団
Governing law: Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type: Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date: 28 May 2021
Issuing authority
Industry context: 鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On March 11-12, 2021, the Wakasa Town Tourism Development Corporation underwent a safety audit conducted by the Chugoku Regional Transport Bureau. The audit identified several issues requiring improvement, leading to the issuance of administrative guidance. The company is instructed to prepare and publish a safety report in accordance with Article 19-4 of the Railway Business Act, which is applicable by reference from Article 38 of the same law. Additionally, the company must review and update its maintenance regulations to include inspection items such as 'tension bogies' and to follow proper procedures for changes in maintenance rules, including the modification of the standby prime mover's trial operation cycle. The company is also advised to properly store and manage documents related to facility modifications and to record all inspections, including temporary and January inspections, in compliance with the relevant ministerial ordinance. The company is expected to report on the measures taken by July 1, 2021.

Show original Japanese text

令和３年３月１１日から１２日まで、貴事業団に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。講じた措置については、令和３年７月１日までに報告されたい。記１．鉄道事業法第３８条において準用する同法第１９条の４に基づく安全報告書の作成･公表がされていないことを確認した。よって、安全報告書に係る関係規定を熟知したうえで、作成･公表を確実に実施すること。２．整備細則の点検･検査箇所に「緊張台車」の項目が規定されていないこと、予備原動装置の試運転周期が変更されていたが、整備細則の変更手続きが行われていないことを確認した。よって、整備細則の内容を再点検し、索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令第４条に基づく整備細則変更について、必要な手続きを行うこと。３．前回監査で業務の管理体制の改善を指示したところであるが、現行の整備細則や施設の変更に係る図面等が適切に保管されておらず、また、予備原動機試運転周期の変更も未手続きであることを確認した。よって、安全管理規程第１５条第１項を確実に遵守するとともに、業務の管理体制について更なる改善に取り組むこと。４．臨時検査（適合確認検査）及び１月検査の記録について、一部記録漏れを確認した。よって、索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令第４３条に基づき、検査を行ったときは確実に記録するとともに、管理体制の改善を図ること。【中国運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address: 鳥取県八頭郡若桜町
Legal articles: 鉄道事業法索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page: https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=2

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

Recent records in the same industry

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.