Enforcement record

Recommendation disclosure naming 株式会社ティラド

株式会社ティラド (Subcontract Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Subcontract ActMinistry of Economy, Trade and IndustryGovernment disclosure24 February 2026

Action type

Recommendation

Law

Subcontract Act

Authority

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

Action date

24 February 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Jul 12, 2026, 05:30 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社ティラド

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社ティラド?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社ティラドJapanese only
Original: 株式会社ティラド
Governing law
Subcontract Act
下請法
Action type
Recommendation
勧告
Action date
24 February 2026
Issuing authority
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
経済産業省
Industry context
製造業

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

TIRAD Corporation, by December 2023, subcontracted the manufacturing of heat exchanger parts (hereafter 'the products') to other businesses. TIRAD lent molds and jigs (hereafter 'molds, etc.') owned by the company to subcontractors. Between January 1, 2024, and December 11, 2024, despite not placing long-term orders for the products made using these molds, TIRAD caused the subcontractors to store a total of 4,311 molds, without compensation, thereby unjustly harming the subcontractors' interests. The Small and Medium Enterprise Agency's investigation revealed that these actions violated the Subcontract Act (Article 4, Paragraph 2, Item 3), which prohibits unreasonable requests for economic benefits. Consequently, on January 26, 2026, the Agency's Commissioner issued a recommendation to the Fair Trade Commission pursuant to Article 6 of the Act.

Show original Japanese text

ティラドは、令和7年12月までに、他の事業者に対し、自社が製造を請け負う熱交換器の部品(以下「本件製品」という。)の製造を委託した。ティラドは、下請事業者に対して自社が所有する金型及び治具(以下「金型等」という。)を貸与したところ、遅くとも令和6年1月1日から令和7年12月11日までの間、当該金型等を用いて製造する本件製品の発注を長期間行わないにもかかわらず、下請事業者に対し、合計4,311個の金型等を自己のために無償で保管させることにより、下請事業者の利益を不当に害していた。

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.

Subcontracting law governing unfair treatment of subcontractors by main contractors.

Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.