Enforcement record
Recommendation disclosure naming 株式会社マキタ
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Recommendation
Law
Subcontract Act
Authority
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
Action date
16 December 2025
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Source verification
Public-source and preservation status
- Publishing authority
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
- Official source URL
- Recorded by RegBase
- Entity match
- Not confirmed; shown under the published name
- Kiroku preservation
- Completed archive verified
- Captured: Jul 12, 2026, 05:40 PM JST
“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.
Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.
Action summary
- Company
- 株式会社マキタJapanese onlyOriginal: 株式会社マキタ
- Governing law
- Subcontract Act下請代金支払遅延等防止法
- Action type
- Recommendation勧告
- Action date
- 16 December 2025
- Issuing authority
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry経済産業省
- Industry context
- 電動工具部品製造
Violation
Makita Corporation, a business with capital of 3 billion yen or less, engaged in manufacturing of power tool parts. The company lent molds it owned to subcontractors (referred to as 'subcontractors') for the production of parts. Between January 1, 2024, and September 30, 2025, despite not placing orders for parts using these molds for an extended period, Makita caused undue harm to the subcontractors' interests by having them store a total of 3,214 molds free of charge. Makita had a memorandum with subcontractors regarding mold storage costs, and agreed to pay these costs from the month following the memorandum. By August 31, 2025, Makita had disposed of or recovered 1,176 molds out of the 3,214. After discussions and invoicing, Makita paid a total of 26,165,689 yen by October 20, 2025. The violation involves the lending of molds and the failure to place orders over a long period, resulting in undue harm to the subcontractors' interests.
Show original Japanese text
マキタは、下請事業者に対し、金型の保管に関する覚書を取り交わし、その翌月以降に発生する金型の保管に要する費用の支払について合意している。令和7年8月31日までに、前記3,214型のうち1,176型の金型を廃棄又は回収している。下請事業者に対し、協議を行い請求書を徴収した上で、令和7年10月20日までに、総額2616万5689円を支払っている。
Compliance context
MediumA regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.
Japanese regulatory disclosure under Subcontract Act.
Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
- Extracted at
- 2026-05-10T00:04:20.876+00:00
- Evidence checked
- 2026-05-10T00:04:20.876+00:00
- Archive captured
- 2026-07-12T08:40:29.430869+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
"record": {
"id": "d3b1185f-e8e5-42f2-a100-d9f2142a7508",
"url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/other-makita-20251216",
"company_name_original": "株式会社マキタ",
"company_name_registry": null,
"corporate_number": null,
"law": {
"ja": "下請代金支払遅延等防止法",
"en": "Subcontract Act"
},
"action_type": {
"ja": "勧告",
"en": "Recommendation"
},
"authority": {
"ja": "経済産業省",
"en": "Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry"
}
},
"entity_match": {
"status": "unresolved",
"confidence": 60,
"method": "extracted_japanese_name",
"method_label": "Company name extracted from the Japanese public disclosure",
"notes": "The linked company profile has not been verified under the current identity policy."
},
"review": {
"status": "unreviewed",
"label": "Machine extracted"
},
"compliance_context": {
"severity": "Medium",
"actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a recommendation or formal request for corrective action.",
"practicalNote": "Review the facts and follow-up status. This is usually less severe than a suspension or revocation, but still a public enforcement signal.",
"lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Subcontract Act."
},
"evidence": {
"recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/other-makita-20251216",
"officialSourceUrl": "https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2025/12/20251216002/20251216002.html",
"officialDocumentUrl": null,
"archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/826b1ae0adhjma6e",
"archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.meti.go.jp/press/2025/12/20251216002/20251216002.html",
"archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-12T08:40:29.430869+00:00",
"extractedAt": "2026-05-10T00:04:20.876+00:00",
"translatedAt": "2026-07-06T07:32:52.098+00:00",
"evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-05-10T00:04:20.876+00:00",
"generatedAt": "2026-10-03T06:42:26.151Z"
},
"limitations": [
"RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
"English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
"Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
]
}The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.