Enforcement record
Business Suspension disclosure naming 植村建設
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Business Suspension
Law
Construction Business Act
Authority
Osaka Prefecture
Action date
31 August 2024
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Source verification
Public-source and preservation status
- Publishing authority
- Osaka Prefecture
- Official source URL
- Recorded by RegBase
- Entity match
- Not confirmed; shown under the published name
- Kiroku preservation
- Queued for preservation
- Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 03:20 AM JST
“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.
Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.
Direct inquiry
Ask about this enforcement record
Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.
English public-record screening
Need a documented check for 植村建設?
Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.
- ✓ English and Japanese company identity
- ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
- ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
- ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file
This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.
No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.
See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcherPublic documents and saved materials
View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.
Loading materials…
Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.
Action summary
- Company
- 植村建設Japanese onlyOriginal: 植村建設
- Governing law
- Construction Business Act建設業法
- Action type
- Business Suspension営業停止
- Action date
- 31 August 2024
- Issuing authority
- Osaka Prefecture大阪府
- Industry context
- 建設業者
Violation
(1) The construction company violated Article 16, Item 2 of the Building Business Act by entering into subcontract agreements exceeding the amount specified by government ordinance without obtaining the permit categorized under the division listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Act, in private construction works in Higashiosaka City. Additionally, the company failed to place a qualified supervising engineer at the construction site and did not prepare the construction management ledger or the construction system diagram as required by Articles 24-8, Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 4 of the Act, respectively. (2) The company also violated Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Building Business Act by contracting with Otani Shinkenzai Co., Ltd., which operates without the necessary permit, in breach of the Act.
Show original Japanese text
(1) 当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第16条第２号の規定に違反して、同法第３条第１項第２号に掲げる区分による許可を受けないで下請代金の額が同号の政令で定める金額以上となる下請契約を他の建設業者等と締結した。また、本件工事において、同号に掲げる区分による許可を受けて、同法第26条第２項に規定する監理技術者を工事現場に配置すべきところ、当該許可を受けず、適格な監理技術者を配置しなかった。加えて、同様に、同法第24条の８第１項に規定する施工体制台帳及び同条第４項に規定する施工体系図も作成しなかった。（同法第28条第１項第２号該当） (2) 当該建設業者は、本件工事において、建設業法第３条第１項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで建設業を営む大谷新建材株式会社と下請契約を締結した（同法第28条第１項第６号該当）。
Business location and permit details
- Business location address
- 大阪府南河内郡太子町大字春日６９番地
- Representative
- 植村 俊和
- Permit / registration number
- 大阪府知事（般－5）第130370号
- Permitted business types
- Building works
- Legal articles
- 建設業法第28条第３項
- Cause of action
- (1) 当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第16条第２号の規定に違反して、同法第３条第１項第２号に掲げる区分による許可を受けないで下請代金の額が同号の政令で定める金額以上となる下請契約を他の建設業者等と締結した。また、本件工事において、同号に掲げる区分による許可を受けて、同法第26条第２項に規定する監理技術者を工事現場に配置すべきところ、当該許可を受けず、適格な監理技術者を配置しなかった。加えて、同様に、同法第24条の８第１項に規定する施工体制台帳及び同条第４項に規定する施工体系図も作成しなかった。（同法第28条第１項第２号該当） (2) 当該建設業者は、本件工事において、建設業法第３条第１項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで建設業を営む大谷新建材株式会社と下請契約を締結した（同法第28条第１項第６号該当）。
- Other notes
- 本件工事は同日に行った指示処分に係るものと同一
- Overview page
- https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1193
These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.
Compliance context
Context neededThis is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.
Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.
Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)Recent records in the same industry
About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.