Enforcement record

Business Suspension disclosure naming 植村建設

植村建設 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOsaka PrefectureGovernment disclosure31 August 2024

Action type

Business Suspension

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Osaka Prefecture

Action date

31 August 2024

RegBase evidence report

Japanese public-record enforcement check

Saveable record of the published action, regulator source, source status, and review notes for internal compliance files.

Report ID: RB-EN-ENFORCEMENT-KENSETSU-GYOHO-ZH-202608101558
Generated at: 11 August 2026 at 00:58
Record URL: https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-zhi-cun-jian-she-20240831

1. Review Summary

Disclosure name	植村建設	Corporate Number	Not stated in the disclosure
Enforcement record	1 record	Other confirmed records for this company	Outside this report's scope
Action date	31 August 2024	Authority	Osaka Prefecture
Law	Construction Business Act	Action type	Business Suspension
Source status	Preserved public-source archive recorded

This report summarizes public Japanese government disclosure data held by RegBase. It is not a credit score, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or adverse-media determination. Confirm important decisions against the linked official Japanese source.

2. Published Information

Published name	植村建設

3. Enforcement Record

Target name in disclosure	植村建設
Authority	Osaka Prefecture (大阪府)
Law / action type	Construction Business Act / Business Suspension
Action / announcement date	Action: 31 August 2024 / Announcement: 25 April 2026
English summary	(1) The construction company violated Article 16, Item 2 of the Building Business Act by entering into subcontract agreements exceeding the amount specified by government ordinance without obtaining the permit categorized under the division listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Act, in private construction works in Higashiosaka City. Additionally, the company failed to place a qualified supervising engineer at the construction site and did not prepare the construction management ledger or the construction system diagram as required by Articles 24-8, Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 4 of the Act, respectively. (2) The company also violated Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Building Business Act by contracting with Otani Shinkenzai Co., Ltd., which operates without the necessary permit, in breach of the Act.
Original Japanese text	(1) 当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第16条第２号の規定に違反して、同法第３条第１項第２号に掲げる区分による許可を受けないで下請代金の額が同号の政令で定める金額以上となる下請契約を他の建設業者等と締結した。また、本件工事において、同号に掲げる区分による許可を受けて、同法第26条第２項に規定する監理技術者を工事現場に配置すべきところ、当該許可を受けず、適格な監理技術者を配置しなかった。加えて、同様に、同法第24条の８第１項に規定する施工体制台帳及び同条第４項に規定する施工体系図も作成しなかった。（同法第28条第１項第２号該当） (2) 当該建設業者は、本件工事において、建設業法第３条第１項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで建設業を営む大谷新建材株式会社と下請契約を締結した（同法第28条第１項第６号該当）。
Official source	https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1193
Source archive	https://kiroku.today/a/85a184bab6i4c7fh
Extraction / evidence timestamps	Extracted: 17 July 2026 at 17:41 / Evidence checked: 17 July 2026 at 17:41 / Archive captured: 13 July 2026 at 03:20

4. Business Location and Permit Details

Business location address	大阪府南河内郡太子町大字春日６９番地
Representative	植村俊和
Permit / registration number	大阪府知事（般－5）第130370号
Permitted business types	Building works
Legal articles	建設業法第28条第３項
Cause of action	(1) 当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第16条第２号の規定に違反して、同法第３条第１項第２号に掲げる区分による許可を受けないで下請代金の額が同号の政令で定める金額以上となる下請契約を他の建設業者等と締結した。また、本件工事において、同号に掲げる区分による許可を受けて、同法第26条第２項に規定する監理技術者を工事現場に配置すべきところ、当該許可を受けず、適格な監理技術者を配置しなかった。加えて、同様に、同法第24条の８第１項に規定する施工体制台帳及び同条第４項に規定する施工体系図も作成しなかった。（同法第28条第１項第２号該当） (2) 当該建設業者は、本件工事において、建設業法第３条第１項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで建設業を営む大谷新建材株式会社と下請契約を締結した（同法第28条第１項第６号該当）。
Other notes	本件工事は同日に行った指示処分に係るものと同一
Overview page	https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1193

5. Other Confirmed Records for This Company

This report covers the single government disclosure shown on this page.

Reviewer Notes

Reviewer		Team / company
Review purpose
Additional notes

□ Official source URL or archived source was checked.
□ Corporate Number, address, or other identifiers were reviewed to avoid confusing similarly named entities.
□ This document is understood as a public-record evidence file, not a credit decision or legal opinion.

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming 植村建設

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 植村建設

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%A4%8D%E6%9D%91%E5%BB%BA%E8%A8%AD&limit=10

Open JSON Specs

Action summary

Company: 植村建設Japanese only
Original: 植村建設
Governing law: Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type: Business Suspension
営業停止
Action date: 31 August 2024
Issuing authority: Osaka Prefecture
大阪府
Industry context: 建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

(1) The construction company violated Article 16, Item 2 of the Building Business Act by entering into subcontract agreements exceeding the amount specified by government ordinance without obtaining the permit categorized under the division listed in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Act, in private construction works in Higashiosaka City. Additionally, the company failed to place a qualified supervising engineer at the construction site and did not prepare the construction management ledger or the construction system diagram as required by Articles 24-8, Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 4 of the Act, respectively. (2) The company also violated Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Building Business Act by contracting with Otani Shinkenzai Co., Ltd., which operates without the necessary permit, in breach of the Act.

Show original Japanese text

(1) 当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第16条第２号の規定に違反して、同法第３条第１項第２号に掲げる区分による許可を受けないで下請代金の額が同号の政令で定める金額以上となる下請契約を他の建設業者等と締結した。また、本件工事において、同号に掲げる区分による許可を受けて、同法第26条第２項に規定する監理技術者を工事現場に配置すべきところ、当該許可を受けず、適格な監理技術者を配置しなかった。加えて、同様に、同法第24条の８第１項に規定する施工体制台帳及び同条第４項に規定する施工体系図も作成しなかった。（同法第28条第１項第２号該当） (2) 当該建設業者は、本件工事において、建設業法第３条第１項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで建設業を営む大谷新建材株式会社と下請契約を締結した（同法第28条第１項第６号該当）。

Business location and permit details

Business location address: 大阪府南河内郡太子町大字春日６９番地
Representative: 植村俊和
Permit / registration number: 大阪府知事（般－5）第130370号
Permitted business types: Building works
Legal articles: 建設業法第28条第３項
Cause of action: (1) 当該建設業者は、東大阪市内の民間発注の工事（以下「本件工事」という。）において、建設業法第16条第２号の規定に違反して、同法第３条第１項第２号に掲げる区分による許可を受けないで下請代金の額が同号の政令で定める金額以上となる下請契約を他の建設業者等と締結した。また、本件工事において、同号に掲げる区分による許可を受けて、同法第26条第２項に規定する監理技術者を工事現場に配置すべきところ、当該許可を受けず、適格な監理技術者を配置しなかった。加えて、同様に、同法第24条の８第１項に規定する施工体制台帳及び同条第４項に規定する施工体系図も作成しなかった。（同法第28条第１項第２号該当） (2) 当該建設業者は、本件工事において、建設業法第３条第１項の規定に違反して同項の許可を受けないで建設業を営む大谷新建材株式会社と下請契約を締結した（同法第28条第１項第６号該当）。
Other notes: 本件工事は同日に行った指示処分に係るものと同一
Overview page: https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1193

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Osaka Prefecture source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack

Extracted at: 2026-07-17T08:41:43.572+00:00
Evidence checked: 2026-07-17T08:41:43.572+00:00
Archive captured: 2026-07-12T18:20:57.070382+00:00

Show audit JSON

{
  "record": {
    "id": "b302a5f2-168f-446e-b422-95cb25806789",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-zhi-cun-jian-she-20240831",
    "company_name_original": "植村建設",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "営業停止",
      "en": "Business Suspension"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "大阪府",
      "en": "Osaka Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 65,
    "method": "loose_name_without_strong_address_evidence",
    "method_label": "loose_name_without_strong_address_evidence",
    "notes": "公表資料の名称は収録しましたが、法人番号へ安全に結び付ける独立証拠が不足しています。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Context needed",
    "actionMeaning": "This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.",
    "practicalNote": "Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-zhi-cun-jian-she-20240831",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1193",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/85a184bab6i4c7fh",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1193",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-12T18:20:57.070382+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T08:41:43.572+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-05-01T08:01:48.333+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:41:43.572+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-10T15:58:15.363Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

Recent records in the same industry

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.