Action summary

Company

新日本特機株式会社Japanese original

Original: 新日本特機株式会社

Corporate Number: 9080401002265

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

12 July 2022

Issuing authority

Shizuoka Prefecture

静岡県

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

Nippon Tokki Corporation operated without meeting the standards of Article 15, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act after its designated technical engineer for its electrical construction business left on September 30, 2020, and until a new engineer with the necessary qualifications obtained certification on March 11, 2022. Additionally, the company failed to submit the required notification to the governor within two weeks after the standards were no longer met, as mandated by Article 11, Paragraph 5 of the Act (applied mutatis mutandis by Article 17), until May 27, 2022. These actions are recognized as violations of Article 15, Item 2, and Article 11, Paragraph 5 of the Construction Business Act, and are subject to the order under Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the same law.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

静岡県浜松市西区

Representative

山内 致雄

Permit / registration number

静岡県知事(般特-29)第35787号

Permitted business types

Electrical works, Pipe works, Machinery and equipment installation works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第１項

Cause of action

新日本特機株式会社は、電気工事業に係る営業所の専任技術者が令和２年９月30日に退社し、令和４年３月11日に新たな営業所の専任技術者が必要な資格を取得するまでの間、建設業法第15条第２号の基準を満たさなくなったことにより許可要件を欠いたまま営業していた。また、建設業法第15条第２号の基準を満たさなくなった場合、２週間以内に同法第11条第５項（同法第17条により準用。以下同じ。）に規定する届出書を知事に提出しなければならないにもかかわらず、令和４年５月27日に至るまで届出を行わなかった。 このことが、建設業法第15条第２号及び同法第11条第５項に違反し、同法第28条第１項本文に該当するものと認められる。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=492

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "2d8b9d02-e78b-4347-9840-8b8159104123",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-xin-ri-ben-te-ji-20220712",
    "company_name_original": "新日本特機株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": "新日本特機株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "9080401002265",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "静岡県",
      "en": "Shizuoka Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-xin-ri-ben-te-ji-20220712",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=492",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T13:30:18.388+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:56:19.981+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T15:16:14.286Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.