Enforcement record
Directive disclosure naming 株式会社建翔工業
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Directive
Law
Construction Business Act
Authority
Oita Prefecture
Action date
15 November 2024
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Source verification
Public-source and preservation status
- Publishing authority
- Oita Prefecture
- Official source URL
- Recorded by RegBase
- Entity match
- Not confirmed; shown under the published name
- Kiroku preservation
- Completed archive verified
- Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 04:01 AM JST
“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.
Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.
Action summary
- Company
- 株式会社建翔工業Japanese onlyOriginal: 株式会社建翔工業
- Governing law
- Construction Business Act建設業法
- Action type
- Directive指示
- Action date
- 15 November 2024
- Issuing authority
- Oita Prefecture大分県
- Industry context
- 建設業者
Violation
Kensho Kogyo Co., Ltd. entered into subcontract agreements totaling over 45 million yen as the prime contractor for civil engineering work ordered privately, without possessing the permit for specified construction business as stipulated in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. This violates Article 16, Item 1 of the same Act and falls under Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 28. Additionally, for the work in question, the company failed to install a supervising engineer at the construction site as required by Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Act, instead installing an individual who did not meet the qualification requirements. This also violates Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Construction Business Act and falls under Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 28.
Show original Japanese text
株式会社建翔工業は、民間発注の土木一式工事において、建設業法第3条第1項第2号に規定する特定建設業の許可を有していないにも関わらず、元請業者として総額4,500万円以上の下請契約を締結した。 このことは、同法第16条第1号の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 また、本件工事において、同法第26条第2項の規定に基づき監理技術者を工事現場に設置すべきところ、これに違反して資格要件を満たさない者を設置していた。 このことは、建設業法第26条第2項の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。
Business location and permit details
- Business location address
- 大分県由布市庄内町柿原518番地
- Representative
- 栗林 武士
- Permit / registration number
- 大分県知事(般-02)第13018号
- Permitted business types
- Civil engineering works, Building works, Carpentry works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Stone works, Roof works, Pipe works, Tile, brick, and block works, Steel structure works, Paving works, し, Interior finishing works, Water facilities works, Demolition works
- Legal articles
- 建設業法第28条第1項第2号
- Cause of action
- 株式会社建翔工業は、民間発注の土木一式工事において、建設業法第3条第1項第2号に規定する特定建設業の許可を有していないにも関わらず、元請業者として総額4,500万円以上の下請契約を締結した。 このことは、同法第16条第1号の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 また、本件工事において、同法第26条第2項の規定に基づき監理技術者を工事現場に設置すべきところ、これに違反して資格要件を満たさない者を設置していた。 このことは、建設業法第26条第2項の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。
- Other notes
- 経営事項審査
- Overview page
- https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308
These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.
Compliance context
MediumA regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.
Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.
Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
- Extracted at
- 2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00
- Evidence checked
- 2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00
- Archive captured
- 2026-07-12T19:01:39.865012+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
"record": {
"id": "dc5695f0-2938-4ae0-ab09-f860b6a0e20d",
"url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jian-xiang-gong-ye-20241115",
"company_name_original": "株式会社建翔工業",
"company_name_registry": null,
"corporate_number": null,
"law": {
"ja": "建設業法",
"en": "Construction Business Act"
},
"action_type": {
"ja": "指示",
"en": "Directive"
},
"authority": {
"ja": "大分県",
"en": "Oita Prefecture"
}
},
"entity_match": {
"status": "unresolved",
"confidence": 95,
"method": "nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported",
"method_label": "nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported",
"notes": "有力な法人候補がありますが、自動確定に必要な独立証拠が不足しています(nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported)。"
},
"review": {
"status": "needs_review",
"label": "Needs review"
},
"compliance_context": {
"severity": "Medium",
"actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
"practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
"lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
},
"evidence": {
"recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jian-xiang-gong-ye-20241115",
"officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308",
"officialDocumentUrl": null,
"archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/27f172c65ci5rsn1",
"archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308",
"archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-12T19:01:39.865012+00:00",
"extractedAt": "2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00",
"translatedAt": "2026-05-01T07:57:41.936+00:00",
"evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00",
"generatedAt": "2026-09-18T19:43:50.944Z"
},
"limitations": [
"RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
"English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
"Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
]
}The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)Recent records in the same industry
About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.