Enforcement record
Directive disclosure naming 株式会社建翔工業
This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.
Action type
Directive
Law
Construction Business Act
Authority
Oita Prefecture
Action date
15 November 2024
RegBase evidence report
Japanese public-record enforcement check
Saveable record of the published action, regulator source, source status, and review notes for internal compliance files.
- Report ID
- RB-EN-ENFORCEMENT-KENSETSU-GYOHO-JI-202608041422
- Generated at
- 4 August 2026 at 23:22
- Record URL
- https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jian-xiang-gong-ye-20241115
1. Review Summary
| Disclosure name | 株式会社建翔工業 | Corporate Number | Not stated in the disclosure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement record | 1 record | Other confirmed records for this company | Outside this report's scope |
| Action date | 15 November 2024 | Authority | Oita Prefecture |
| Law | Construction Business Act | Action type | Directive |
| Source status | Preserved public-source archive recorded | ||
This report summarizes public Japanese government disclosure data held by RegBase. It is not a credit score, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or adverse-media determination. Confirm important decisions against the linked official Japanese source.
2. Published Information
| Published name | 株式会社建翔工業 |
|---|
3. Enforcement Record
| Target name in disclosure | 株式会社建翔工業 |
|---|---|
| Authority | Oita Prefecture (大分県) |
| Law / action type | Construction Business Act / Directive |
| Action / announcement date | Action: 15 November 2024 / Announcement: 25 April 2026 |
| English summary | Kensho Kogyo Co., Ltd. entered into subcontract agreements totaling over 45 million yen as the prime contractor for civil engineering work ordered privately, without possessing the permit for specified construction business as stipulated in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. This violates Article 16, Item 1 of the same Act and falls under Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 28. Additionally, for the work in question, the company failed to install a supervising engineer at the construction site as required by Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Act, instead installing an individual who did not meet the qualification requirements. This also violates Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Construction Business Act and falls under Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 28. |
| Original Japanese text | 株式会社建翔工業は、民間発注の土木一式工事において、建設業法第3条第1項第2号に規定する特定建設業の許可を有していないにも関わらず、元請業者として総額4,500万円以上の下請契約を締結した。 このことは、同法第16条第1号の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 また、本件工事において、同法第26条第2項の規定に基づき監理技術者を工事現場に設置すべきところ、これに違反して資格要件を満たさない者を設置していた。 このことは、建設業法第26条第2項の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 |
| Official source | https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308 |
| Source archive | https://kiroku.today/a/27f172c65ci5rsn1 |
| Extraction / evidence timestamps | Extracted: 17 July 2026 at 17:40 / Evidence checked: 17 July 2026 at 17:40 / Archive captured: 13 July 2026 at 04:01 |
4. Business Location and Permit Details
| Business location address | 大分県由布市庄内町柿原518番地 |
|---|---|
| Representative | 栗林 武士 |
| Permit / registration number | 大分県知事(般-02)第13018号 |
| Permitted business types | Civil engineering works, Building works, Carpentry works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Stone works, Roof works, Pipe works, Tile, brick, and block works, Steel structure works, Paving works, し, Interior finishing works, Water facilities works, Demolition works |
| Legal articles | 建設業法第28条第1項第2号 |
| Cause of action | 株式会社建翔工業は、民間発注の土木一式工事において、建設業法第3条第1項第2号に規定する特定建設業の許可を有していないにも関わらず、元請業者として総額4,500万円以上の下請契約を締結した。 このことは、同法第16条第1号の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 また、本件工事において、同法第26条第2項の規定に基づき監理技術者を工事現場に設置すべきところ、これに違反して資格要件を満たさない者を設置していた。 このことは、建設業法第26条第2項の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 |
| Other notes | 経営事項審査 |
| Overview page | https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308 |
5. Other Confirmed Records for This Company
This report covers the single government disclosure shown on this page.
Reviewer Notes
| Reviewer | Team / company | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Review purpose | |||
| Additional notes | |||
- □ Official source URL or archived source was checked.
- □ Corporate Number, address, or other identifiers were reviewed to avoid confusing similarly named entities.
- □ This document is understood as a public-record evidence file, not a credit decision or legal opinion.
Current page: Enforcement record
This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.
Free report
Save the disclosure record naming 株式会社建翔工業
Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.
Preserved evidence by Kiroku
Review the preserved source for 株式会社建翔工業
Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.
For developers: JSON integration details
You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.
Action summary
- Company
- 株式会社建翔工業Japanese onlyOriginal: 株式会社建翔工業
- Governing law
- Construction Business Act建設業法
- Action type
- Directive指示
- Action date
- 15 November 2024
- Issuing authority
- Oita Prefecture大分県
- Industry context
- 建設業者
Violation
Kensho Kogyo Co., Ltd. entered into subcontract agreements totaling over 45 million yen as the prime contractor for civil engineering work ordered privately, without possessing the permit for specified construction business as stipulated in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. This violates Article 16, Item 1 of the same Act and falls under Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 28. Additionally, for the work in question, the company failed to install a supervising engineer at the construction site as required by Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Act, instead installing an individual who did not meet the qualification requirements. This also violates Article 26, Paragraph 2 of the Construction Business Act and falls under Item 2 of Paragraph 1 of Article 28.
Show original Japanese text
株式会社建翔工業は、民間発注の土木一式工事において、建設業法第3条第1項第2号に規定する特定建設業の許可を有していないにも関わらず、元請業者として総額4,500万円以上の下請契約を締結した。 このことは、同法第16条第1号の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 また、本件工事において、同法第26条第2項の規定に基づき監理技術者を工事現場に設置すべきところ、これに違反して資格要件を満たさない者を設置していた。 このことは、建設業法第26条第2項の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。
Business location and permit details
- Business location address
- 大分県由布市庄内町柿原518番地
- Representative
- 栗林 武士
- Permit / registration number
- 大分県知事(般-02)第13018号
- Permitted business types
- Civil engineering works, Building works, Carpentry works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Stone works, Roof works, Pipe works, Tile, brick, and block works, Steel structure works, Paving works, し, Interior finishing works, Water facilities works, Demolition works
- Legal articles
- 建設業法第28条第1項第2号
- Cause of action
- 株式会社建翔工業は、民間発注の土木一式工事において、建設業法第3条第1項第2号に規定する特定建設業の許可を有していないにも関わらず、元請業者として総額4,500万円以上の下請契約を締結した。 このことは、同法第16条第1号の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。 また、本件工事において、同法第26条第2項の規定に基づき監理技術者を工事現場に設置すべきところ、これに違反して資格要件を満たさない者を設置していた。 このことは、建設業法第26条第2項の規定に違反し、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。
- Other notes
- 経営事項審査
- Overview page
- https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308
These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.
Compliance context
MediumA regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.
Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.
Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.
This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.
Evidence pack
- Extracted at
- 2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00
- Evidence checked
- 2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00
- Archive captured
- 2026-07-12T19:01:39.865012+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
"record": {
"id": "dc5695f0-2938-4ae0-ab09-f860b6a0e20d",
"url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jian-xiang-gong-ye-20241115",
"company_name_original": "株式会社建翔工業",
"company_name_registry": null,
"corporate_number": null,
"law": {
"ja": "建設業法",
"en": "Construction Business Act"
},
"action_type": {
"ja": "指示",
"en": "Directive"
},
"authority": {
"ja": "大分県",
"en": "Oita Prefecture"
}
},
"entity_match": {
"status": "unresolved",
"confidence": 95,
"method": "nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported",
"method_label": "nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported",
"notes": "有力な法人候補がありますが、自動確定に必要な独立証拠が不足しています(nta_strict_name_non_head_office_address_supported)。"
},
"review": {
"status": "needs_review",
"label": "Needs review"
},
"compliance_context": {
"severity": "Medium",
"actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
"practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
"lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
},
"evidence": {
"recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jian-xiang-gong-ye-20241115",
"officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308",
"officialDocumentUrl": null,
"archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/27f172c65ci5rsn1",
"archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1308",
"archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-12T19:01:39.865012+00:00",
"extractedAt": "2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00",
"translatedAt": "2026-05-01T07:57:41.936+00:00",
"evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:40:28.073+00:00",
"generatedAt": "2026-08-04T14:22:01.000Z"
},
"limitations": [
"RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
"English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
"Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
]
}The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.
Language
日本語版を見る (Japanese)Recent records in the same industry
- Business Suspension24 Jul 2026
株式会社東武土木
Construction Business Act
- Business Suspension24 Jul 2026
京葉ガスエナジーソリューション株式会社
Construction Business Act
- Directive24 Jul 2026
東洋テクノ株式会社
Construction Business Act
- Directive24 Jul 2026
株式会社大林組
Construction Business Act
- License Revocation23 Jul 2026
株式会社三和サービス
Construction Business Act
About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.