Enforcement record

License Revocation disclosure naming イシケン建設工業株式会社

イシケン建設工業株式会社 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOita PrefectureGovernment disclosure28 December 2021

Action type

License Revocation

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Oita Prefecture

Action date

28 December 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming イシケン建設工業株式会社

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B1%E3%83%B3%E5%BB%BA%E8%A8%AD%E5%B7%A5%E6%A5%AD%E6%A0%AA%E5%BC%8F%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE&limit=10

Action summary

Company
イシケン建設工業株式会社Japanese only
Original: イシケン建設工業株式会社
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
License Revocation
許可取消
Action date
28 December 2021
Issuing authority
Oita Prefecture
大分県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The company’s representative director was convicted of a fine for assault on March 31, 2018, which disqualified him under the Construction Business Act. Despite this, he concealed the fact and submitted a false pledge stating he had no disqualifying factors in the construction permit application dated February 12, 2020. Additionally, a director of the company was convicted of violating the Stimulant Control Law and received a probationary prison sentence on June 16, 2018, which he also concealed when submitting a false application. The company subsequently obtained a construction permit on March 10, 2020. These actions constitute violations under Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Construction Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

代表取締役が、平成30年3月31日に傷害罪により罰金刑が確定し、許可の欠格要件に該当していたにもかかわらず、当該事実を秘し、令和2年2月12日付けの建設業許可申請書に、欠格要件に該当しない旨を記載した虚偽の誓約書及び賞罰がない旨を記載した虚偽の許可申請者(法人の役員等)の住所等に関する調書を添付し、更に、同社取締役が、平成30年6月16日に覚せい剤取締法違反等により懲役刑(執行猶予付き)が確定していたにもかかわらず、当該事実を秘し、賞罰がない旨を記載した虚偽の許可申請者(法人の役員等)の住所等に関する調書を添付し、新規申請を行い、令和2年3月10日に建設業の許可を受けた。 このことが、建設業法第29条第1項第7号に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
大分県宇佐市安心院町折敷田154番地1
Representative
石川 健人
Permit / registration number
大分県知事許可 (般-1)第14567号
Permitted business types
Civil engineering works, と・, Stone works, Steel structure works, Paving works, Dredging works, Water facilities works, Demolition works
Legal articles
建設業法第29条第1項第7号
Cause of action
代表取締役が、平成30年3月31日に傷害罪により罰金刑が確定し、許可の欠格要件に該当していたにもかかわらず、当該事実を秘し、令和2年2月12日付けの建設業許可申請書に、欠格要件に該当しない旨を記載した虚偽の誓約書及び賞罰がない旨を記載した虚偽の許可申請者(法人の役員等)の住所等に関する調書を添付し、更に、同社取締役が、平成30年6月16日に覚せい剤取締法違反等により懲役刑(執行猶予付き)が確定していたにもかかわらず、当該事実を秘し、賞罰がない旨を記載した虚偽の許可申請者(法人の役員等)の住所等に関する調書を添付し、新規申請を行い、令和2年3月10日に建設業の許可を受けた。 このことが、建設業法第29条第1項第7号に該当する。
Other notes
建設リサイクル法許可申請時の犯歴照会
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=413

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

High

A regulator revoked an authorization or license required for the covered activity.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the affected business line and whether the company can legally perform the contemplated service.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Oita Prefecture source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T09:00:50.796+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "2a24c5f9-fbbc-46da-8cbc-9e7cc7e2df44",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-isikenjian-she-gong-ye-20211228",
    "company_name_original": "イシケン建設工業株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "許可取消",
      "en": "License Revocation"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "大分県",
      "en": "Oita Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 92,
    "method": "nta_loose_name_full_address_supported",
    "method_label": "nta_loose_name_full_address_supported",
    "notes": "有力な法人候補がありますが、自動確定に必要な独立証拠が不足しています(nta_loose_name_full_address_supported)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "High",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator revoked an authorization or license required for the covered activity.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the affected business line and whether the company can legally perform the contemplated service.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-isikenjian-she-gong-ye-20211228",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=413",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T01:30:20.658+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:00:50.796+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-04T15:26:43.855Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.