Enforcement record

Business Suspension disclosure naming 株式会社ディプロ

株式会社ディプロ (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActHyogo PrefectureGovernment disclosure7 February 2022

Action type

Business Suspension

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Hyogo Prefecture

Action date

7 February 2022

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Hyogo Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Saved content requires review

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社ディプロ

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社ディプロ?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社ディプロJapanese only
Original: 株式会社ディプロ
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Business Suspension
営業停止
Action date
7 February 2022
Issuing authority
Hyogo Prefecture
兵庫県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Dipro Corporation was found to have undertaken construction work that does not qualify as minor construction under the Construction Business Act, despite lacking the necessary license under Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the Act. This violation falls under Article 28, Paragraph 2, Item 2 of the same law. The suspension was ordered by Hyogo Prefecture on February 7, 2022, and includes a prohibition on the company's officers from conducting business during the suspension period.

Show original Japanese text

株式会社ディプロは、建設業法第3条第1項の許可を受けていないにもかかわらず、同条第1項ただし書に規定する軽微な建設工事に該当しない建設工事を請け負った。このことは、建設業法第28条第2項第2号に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
兵庫県兵庫県西宮市甲子園九番町1番1号
Representative
越智雅代
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第3項
Cause of action
株式会社ディプロは、建設業法第3条第1項の許可を受けていないにもかかわらず、同条第1項ただし書に規定する軽微な建設工事に該当しない建設工事を請け負った。このことは、建設業法第28条第2項第2号に該当する。
Other notes
同社の役員に対し、同期間営業の禁止を命じている。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1498

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.