Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 株式会社DMCaizu

株式会社DMCaizu (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match30 March 2026

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

30 March 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 株式会社DMCaizu

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 株式会社DMCaizu

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=2380001018274&limit=10

Action summary

Company
Original: 株式会社DMCaizu
Corporate Number: 2380001018274
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
30 March 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Between February 5 and 6, 2026, the Tohoku Transport Bureau conducted a safety audit of DMCaizu Corporation. The audit revealed that the inspection and examination of the carrier grip device on the cable car system exceeded the cycle specified in the Regulations for the Maintenance of Cableway Facilities and the attached schedule. Additionally, some records of inspections conducted under Article 8 of the same regulations, including temporary conformity inspections, were not maintained. DMCaizu is instructed to re-evaluate whether the extended inspection cycle poses safety risks, and if necessary, amend the maintenance regulations to ensure thorough inspections and proper record-keeping. The company must report the measures taken by April 30, 2026.

Show original Japanese text

令和8年2月5日から2月6日まで、貴社に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、保安監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和8年4月30日までに報告されたい。 記 索道施設整備細則第5条に規定する単線固定循環式特殊索道整備細則及び別表に基づき実施する点検及び検査において、搬器の握索装置の解体検査周期を超過する周期で実施していることを確認した。また、臨時検査(適合確認検査)の一部の項目について同細則第8条に基づく検査等の記録が行われていないことを確認した。 よって、搬器の握索装置の解体検査周期が安全上問題ないか再検討するとともに、必要により整備細則の変更等を行い、確実な点検及び検査を実施し、その結果を記録できるよう措置を講ずること。 以上 【東北運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
福島県耶麻郡猪苗代町
Legal articles
索道施設に関する技術上の基準を定める省令
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=230

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-17T09:21:25.544+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T09:21:25.471+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-11T18:32:01.384191+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "f37a3565-2515-444e-9e78-c5534862fc96",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/f37a3565-2515-444e-9e78-c5534862fc96",
    "company_name_original": "株式会社DMCaizu",
    "company_name_registry": "株式会社DMCaizu",
    "corporate_number": "2380001018274",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/f37a3565-2515-444e-9e78-c5534862fc96",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=230",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/fd5d8ae497gpa551",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=230",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-11T18:32:01.384191+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:25.544+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T12:50:45.541+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:25.471+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T12:39:57.433Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.