Enforcement record

戒告 disclosure naming 渡部 徹

渡部 徹 (建築士法)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

建築士法Government disclosure6 January 2026

Action type

戒告

Law

建築士法

Authority

Action date

6 January 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming 渡部 徹

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 渡部 徹

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%B8%A1%E9%83%A8%E3%80%80%E5%BE%B9&limit=10

Action summary

Company
渡部 徹Japanese only
Original: 渡部 徹
Governing law
建築士法
建築士法
Action type
戒告
戒告
Action date
6 January 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context
一級建築士

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Watanabe Tetsu (registration number 235767) was issued a formal warning on January 6, 2026, for a violation related to the design of a building in Aichi Prefecture. The design, prepared as an architect for Dplus Design First-Class Architect Office (registered with Aichi Prefecture, registration number (i-2) 13023), contravened Article 36 of the Building Standards Act (Law No. 201 of 1950) and Article 114, Paragraph 3 of the Enforcement Order of the Building Standards Act (Government Ordinance No. 338 of 1950). Specifically, the design did not comply with standards requiring fire-resistant construction measures for a wooden roof structure over 300 square meters, such as not installing fire-resistant partitions at intervals within the attic space, which is necessary to meet the criteria of Article 115-2, Paragraph 1, Item 7 of the Enforcement Order. The violation involved designing a building that did not meet these fire safety standards.

Show original Japanese text

愛知県内の建築物(1物件)について、ダプラスデザイン一級建築士事務所(愛知県知事登録(い-2)第 13023 号)の業務に関し、設計者として、建築基準法(昭和 25 年法律第 201 号)第 36 条に基づく建築基準法施行令(昭和 25 年政令第 338号。以下「令」という。)第 114 条第3項の規定に違反する設計(建築面積が 300㎡を超える建築物の小屋組が木造である場合において、小屋裏の直下の天井の全部を強化天井とせず、かつ、桁行間隔 12m以内毎に小屋裏に準耐火構造の隔壁を設けない場合には、同項ただし書の規定に基づき、当該建築物を令第 115 条の2第1項第7号の基準に適合させる必要があるにもかかわらず、これに適合しない設計)を行った。

Business location and permit details

Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=ikkyuu&EID=search&no=4
PDF
https://www.cbr.mlit.go.jp/kisya_manage/app/press/file/20260108_e9beb06f3aeba11f4a34f36111dde854/20260108_695f2f1f64da5_upfile.pdf

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Context needed

This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under 建築士法.

Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open the official decision document / PDFOpen preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-12T23:50:46.448+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-12T23:50:46.448+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-13T02:30:56.412873+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "49ff2cf9-63aa-4cb7-bde0-3c53be7f40a6",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/49ff2cf9-63aa-4cb7-bde0-3c53be7f40a6",
    "company_name_original": "渡部 徹",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建築士法",
      "en": "建築士法"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "戒告",
      "en": "戒告"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 0,
    "method": "registry_attempt_deferred",
    "method_label": "registry_attempt_deferred",
    "notes": "法人台帳の候補集合を完全に確認できなかったため、再照合が必要です。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Context needed",
    "actionMeaning": "This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.",
    "practicalNote": "Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under 建築士法."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/49ff2cf9-63aa-4cb7-bde0-3c53be7f40a6",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=ikkyuu&EID=search&no=4",
    "officialDocumentUrl": "https://www.cbr.mlit.go.jp/kisya_manage/app/press/file/20260108_e9beb06f3aeba11f4a34f36111dde854/20260108_695f2f1f64da5_upfile.pdf",
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/b704541f0eilqvzd",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.cbr.mlit.go.jp/kisya_manage/app/press/file/20260108_e9beb06f3aeba11f4a34f36111dde854/20260108_695f2f1f64da5_upfile.pdf",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-13T02:30:56.412873+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-12T23:50:46.448+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T21:10:32.714+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-12T23:50:46.448+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-13T08:17:57.054Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.

About this recordAggregated and translated from public Japanese government disclosures. The English text is for reference only — authoritative content is the linked Japanese source.