Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance against 富山市

富山市 (Railway Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Railway Business ActConfirmed entity match17 February 2026

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

17 February 2026

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Free report

Save a public-record evidence report for 富山市

Includes confirmed target-entity identifiers, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 富山市

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?corporate_number=9000020162019&limit=10

Action summary

Company
富山市Japanese original
Original: 富山市
Corporate Number: 9000020162019
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
17 February 2026
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

From October 22 to October 23, 2025, an safety audit was conducted on Toyama City. The audit revealed issues requiring improvement, notably that during fiscal years 2024 and 2025, the track gauge within Toyama Station's south-north connecting line exceeded the standards specified in Article 4 of the Track Maintenance Guidelines, and maintenance had not been carried out. The city is instructed to promptly carry out necessary track maintenance based on Article 4 of the guidelines, establish a system for proper track management, and report the measures taken by March 17, 2026. The guidance emphasizes the need to develop a system to accurately grasp on-site conditions, regularly verify operational status, organize issues, implement necessary improvements, and strengthen safety management to ensure the feasibility of improvements.

Show original Japanese text

令和7年10月22日から10月23日まで、貴市に対して保安監査を実施したところであるが、監査の結果、改善を要する事項が認められたことから、下記の事項について、改善措置を講ずるよう指示する。 講じた措置については、令和8年3月17日までに報告されたい。 記 以下の事項をはじめとして、現場の状況を的確に把握する体制を整備した上で、現場の業務の実施状況を定期的に検証して、課題を整理し、必要な改善を行うとともに、改善の実行性が確保されるよう安全管理体制の強化を図ること。 1. 令和6年度、令和7年度の軌道変位検査において、富山駅南北接続線 富山駅停留所構内の軌間が、軌道整備心得第4条に規定する整備基準値を超過していたが、整備が実施されていないことを確認した。 よって、軌道整備心得第4条に基づき速やかに整備するとともに、適切な軌道管理が行われるよう体制を構築すること。 以上 【北陸信越運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
富山県富山市
Legal articles
軌道運転規則
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=214

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-07-17T09:21:43.702+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T09:21:43.638+00:00
Archive captured
2026-07-11T18:31:03.648454+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "21bede92-824a-4de7-a79c-2764b2b513a8",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/21bede92-824a-4de7-a79c-2764b2b513a8",
    "company_name_original": "富山市",
    "company_name_registry": "富山市",
    "corporate_number": "9000020162019",
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/21bede92-824a-4de7-a79c-2764b2b513a8",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=214",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/54be749350gp9wfc",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=214",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-07-11T18:31:03.648454+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:43.702+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-10T12:50:42.323+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T09:21:43.638+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T15:56:25.981Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.