Company profile

Company profileConfirmed enforcement recordsEnglish summaries 1/1Japanese original

株式会社ファンズコムテック

株式会社ファンズコムテック· Corporate Number: 7430001029006

株式会社ファンズコムテック is a Japanese company registered in Hokkaido with Corporate Number 7430001029006. RegBase lists 1 public-source enforcement record for this company. The latest listed record is classified as Directive by Hokkaido under the Construction Business Act on 27 Jan 2025. Users should verify material records against the original Japanese source before making legal, credit, procurement, or onboarding decisions.

Ask RegBase about this company

Current page: Company profile

This page brings together Official Gazette notices, enforcement records, registry data, related-company signals, and source-review links for one company. Open individual enforcement records from the history section below.

Public Record Summary

Enforcement records
1
Procurement suspensions
3
Latest public record
19 Mar 2025

Compared with 12 peer companies with enforcement records in the 建設業 industry

This company: 1/peer average: 1.5 (median 1)→ below peer average

Company Identity and Registry Data

English display name
株式会社ファンズコムテック
Original Japanese name
株式会社ファンズコムテック
Corporate Number
7430001029006
Representative
小野 満俊
Registered address
北海道札幌市北区百合が原１１丁目１８７番地
Industry
建設業

Data sources

Direct inquiry

Need a person to review 株式会社ファンズコムテック?

No account needed

Ask a Japan-based team member to confirm the legal entity, explain the recorded public sources, or scope a documented screening.

Inquiry context: 株式会社ファンズコムテック / Corporate Number 7430001029006

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社ファンズコムテック?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Public procurement suspension history

Measures published by Japanese contracting authorities, presented separately from regulatory enforcement.

Confirmed identity · 3 records
Period ended指名停止

文部科学省

Measure date
19 Mar 2025
Suspension period
19 Mar 2025 – 18 Apr 2025
Reason
Licensing-law violation株式会社ファンズコムテックは、北海道開発局が発注した「札幌公共職業安定所外構改修２３建築その他工事」において、国が発注する請負金額八千万円以上（建築一式工事）であることから、建設業法第２６条第３項及び建設業法施行令第２７条により、工事現場ごとに専任の主任技術者を置くこととされているにもかかわらず、営業所における専任の技術者を主任技術者として配置した。このことが、建設業法第２８条１項に該当するものとして、令和７年１月２７日、北海道知事より指示処分を受けた。

Japanese source text is retained where an official English translation is not available.

Open the official-record viewOfficial source
Period ended指名停止Revised publication recorded

北海道防衛局

Measure date
11 Mar 2025
Suspension period
11 Mar 2025 – 10 Apr 2025
Reason
Licensing-law violation当該有資格者は、北海道開発局が発注した「札幌公共職業安定所外構改修23建築その他工事」において、国が発注する請負金額八千万円以上(建築一式工事)であることから、建設業法第26条第3項及び建設業法施行令第27条により、工事現場ごとに専任の主任技術者を置くこととされているにもかかわらず、営業所における専任の技術者を主任技術者として配置したことが、建設業法第28条第1項に該当するものとして、令和7年1月27日、北海道知事から監督処分(指示)を受けた。措置要件期間工事請負契約等に係る指名停止等の措置要領付表第2第13号上記事実が「工事請負契約等に係る指名停止等の措置要領」付表第2第13号(建設業法違反行為)に該当すると認められるため。--1of1--
Rule
工事請負契約等に係る指名停止等の措置要領

Japanese source text is retained where an official English translation is not available.

Open the official-record viewOfficial source
Period ended指名停止

国土交通省北海道開発局

Measure date
6 Mar 2025
Suspension period
6 Mar 2025 – 5 May 2025
Reason
Licensing-law violation北海道開発局は、株式会社ファンズコムテックが建設業法の規定に違反し、北海道知事より監 督処分を受けたことから、指名停止2か月の措置を行いました。 (「北海道開発局工事契約等指名停止等の措置要領」別表第2第14号イに該当) 株式会社ファンズコムテックは、北海道開発局が発注した「札幌公共職業安定所外構改修23建 築その他工事」において、国が発注する請負金額八千万円以上(建築一式工事)であることから、 建設業法第26条第3項及び建設業法施行令第27条により、工事現場ごとに専任の主任技術者を 置くこととされているにもかかわらず、営業所における専任の技術者を主任技術者として配置した。 このことは、建設業法第28条第1項に該当するものとして、令和7年1月27日、北海道知事 より監督処分を受けたため、指名停止措置を行うものです。
Rule
北海道開発局工事契約等指名停止等の措置要領 / 別表第2第14号

Japanese source text is retained where an official English translation is not available.

Open the official-record viewOfficial source

Enforcement and administrative action history

Construction Business ActDirective
Confirmed entity match

On March 6, 2024, a contract was concluded with the Hokkaido Development Bureau for the 'Sapporo Public Employment Security Office External Structure Renovation 23 Construction and Other Works.' Because this is a construction project with a contract amount of 80 million yen or more ordered by the government (comprehensive building work), it requires the appointment of a dedicated chief engineer at each construction site according to Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Construction Business Act and Article 27 of the Enforcement Order of the Construction Business Act. However, a dedicated engineer at the sales office was assigned as the chief engineer for this project. This constitutes a violation of the main text of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

27 Jan 2025Hokkaido Prefecture
Official source URL recordedKiroku archive not completedReview details and sources on RegBase

Language

日本語版を見る (Japanese)

Breakdown by law

Breakdown by action type

About this English name

No official English name source is recorded. The original Japanese name is shown.

If this profile contains an error or your company needs to add context, please use the data correction request form. Submissions are reviewed under RegBase editorial policy.

This page mechanically aggregates and structures public government disclosures and public registry data under the methodology. It is not legal advice, credit scoring, or a final procurement decision. Always verify against the official source pages.