Company profile

Company profileConfirmed enforcement recordsJapanese original

小湊鉄道株式会社

小湊鉄道株式会社· Corporate Number: 8040001053928

This page aggregates company identity, Official Gazette notices, enforcement records, related-company signals, and source-review links into one public-record profile.

Current page: Company profile

This page brings together Official Gazette notices, enforcement records, registry data, related-company signals, and source-review links for one company. Open individual enforcement records from the history section below.

Public Record Summary

Enforcement records
5
Latest public record
28 Apr 2026

Compared with 184 peer companies with enforcement records in the 鉄道事業者 industry

This company: 5/peer average: 2.4 (median 2)→ well above peer average

Repeated actions: 5 actions are recorded for this company. Multiple actions under the same law may be relevant when reviewing repeat compliance issues.

Company Identity and Registry Data

English display name
小湊鉄道株式会社
Original Japanese name
小湊鉄道株式会社
Corporate Number
8040001053928
Registered address
千葉県市原市五井中央東1丁目1番地2
Industry
鉄道事業者

Note: Detailed gBizINFO registry data may not be available for this company yet. Use the public registry links below to review supplemental source information.

Enforcement and administrative action history

Railway Business ActAdministrative Guidance
Multiple confirmed recordsConfirmed entity match

Between March 3 and March 5, 2025, a safety audit was conducted on Kotobuki Railway Co., Ltd. by the Chiba Prefectural Public Safety Commission. The audit identified several areas requiring improvement, leading to the issuance of administrative guidance. The company is instructed to enhance its safety management system by establishing a structure that accurately monitors on-site conditions, regularly verifies operational status, and ensures the effectiveness of corrective actions. Specific issues include: (1) failure to record detailed tunnel inspections every 20 years as per standards; (2) discrepancies between inspection items and records for tunnel and electrical equipment; (3) inspections of long-distance track circuits, uninsulated circuits, operation telephones, and high-voltage switchgear not conducted within permissible periods; (4) inconsistencies in vehicle maintenance inspections and records; (5) lack of planned repairs based on track displacement inspections; (6) failure to follow procedures for new construction of box culverts under tracks; (7) inadequate staff training for train drivers, especially those involved in vehicle maintenance; (8) insufficient health and vision checks for staff operating trains; and (9) improper operational procedures during train dispatching. The company must report on the implementation of corrective measures by August 14, 2025.

14 May 2025
Official source URL recordedKiroku archive completeReview details and sources on RegBase
Railway Business ActAdministrative Guidance
Multiple confirmed recordsConfirmed entity match

On January 15, 2024, Minato Railway Co., Ltd. (corporate number 8040001053928), based in Ichihara City, Chiba Prefecture, reported to the authorities that one of its drivers (hereafter 'the driver') had operated a train or vehicle without conducting alcohol tests using an alcohol detector before duty, and that another person had substituted for the test, falsely passing it. An audit was conducted on January 17, 2024, which identified issues requiring improvement. The company was instructed to verify the appropriateness of operational methods, implementation status, and management related to these issues, investigate the root causes including underlying factors, and develop measures to prevent recurrence, ensuring the safety of railway transportation. The company was also asked to report on the corrective actions by March 8, 2024. Specifically, it was confirmed that the driver had repeatedly allowed a conductor to substitute for alcohol testing using an alcohol detector while the station staff was away, and on October 19, 2023, the driver turned off the alcohol detector during testing to avoid detection of alcohol, refusing re-test instructions and instead having the safety officer conduct the test. The guidance emphasizes the need for thorough safety awareness regarding alcohol consumption, compliance with laws and regulations, and the establishment of a system for accurate on-site situation awareness, with regular verification and improvement. Furthermore, the guidance references the interpretation standards for technical regulations related to railways, specifically regarding the education and training of personnel directly involved in train operations ('operation personnel'). It was confirmed that the company’s implementation guidelines do not specify necessary details for training and record-keeping, and that records of training are not maintained, making management and verification difficult. The company is instructed to include these details in their implementation guidelines, maintain records, and properly manage the training process. Failure to comply with these instructions, or if safety management improvements are not confirmed, or if violations recur, may result in orders for business improvement based on relevant legal provisions, including the Railway Business Act Article 23 and the Administrative Procedure Act Article 35, which authorize such measures when safety or public interests are deemed to be hindered. This guidance was issued by the Kanto Transport Bureau.

8 Mar 2024
Official source URL recordedKiroku archive completeReview details and sources on RegBase
Railway Business ActAdministrative Guidance
Multiple confirmed recordsConfirmed entity match

Between October 19 and 21, 2022, a safety audit was conducted on Minato Railway Co., Ltd., based in Ichihara City, Chiba Prefecture. The audit revealed several issues requiring improvement, leading to instructions for corrective actions to be taken by March 31, 2023. The identified deficiencies include: 1. Lack of an annual training plan for staff involved in train and vehicle operation, contrary to the report from October 12, 2016, which stated such plans were to be created at the beginning of each fiscal year and approved by the Safety Promotion Committee. 2. Inadequate facility maintenance, including exceeding inspection cycles for track patrols and failure to record inspection results for rails, ballast, and track markers, violating the standards set in the Track Construction Standards. 3. Failure to conduct periodic inspections of electrical safety equipment, specifically the insulation testing of high-voltage distribution cables within the prescribed period. 4. Vehicles, including rolling stock, were inspected outside the scheduled cycles, and management of inspection data and schedules was insufficient. 5. Records of important inspections for trolley vehicles, including outsourced tasks, were not properly maintained, with missing records for specific inspections such as the clearance measurements between the axle box and the axle. 6. Several train drivers did not submit required qualification management reports after mental health assessments conducted between April 8 and May 18, 2021. 7. Inadequate health and pre-duty checks for train drivers, including incomplete vision tests and failure to verify corrective eyewear conditions before duty. 8. Organizational changes made on February 1, 2019, to unify crew call procedures were not properly reported to the authorities, violating the Railway Business Act and its enforcement regulations. The company was instructed to investigate the root causes of these issues, implement corrective measures, and report back by the specified deadline, ensuring compliance with the Railway Business Act and related technical standards.

20 Jan 2023
Official source URL recordedKiroku archive completeReview details and sources on RegBase

Breakdown by law

Breakdown by action type

About this English name

No official English name source is recorded. The original Japanese name is shown.

If this profile contains an error or your company needs to add context, please use the correction request form. Submissions are reviewed under RegBase editorial policy.

This page mechanically aggregates and structures public government disclosures and public registry data under the editorial policy. It is not legal advice, credit scoring, or a final procurement decision. Always verify against the official source pages.