Enforcement record

Administrative Guidance disclosure naming 万葉線株式会社

万葉線株式会社 (Railway Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Railway Business ActGovernment disclosure16 May 2022

Action type

Administrative Guidance

Law

Railway Business Act

Authority

Action date

16 May 2022

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Completed archive verified
Captured: May 16, 2026, 09:36 PM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Open the official source links in the section below to review the original disclosure.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E4%B8%87%E8%91%89%E7%B7%9A%E6%A0%AA%E5%BC%8F%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE&limit=10

Action summary

Company
万葉線株式会社Japanese only
Original: 万葉線株式会社
Governing law
Railway Business Act
鉄道事業法
Action type
Administrative Guidance
行政指導
Action date
16 May 2022
Issuing authority
Industry context
鉄道事業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On April 15, 2022, the Japan Transport Safety Bureau conducted a safety audit of Man'yo Line Co., Ltd., based on reports that the company's transportation manager had not undergone the required fitness examinations as stipulated under Railway Operation Regulations Article 7-2. The audit revealed that, despite the company's internal regulations, the required periodic work aptitude tests, including the Uchida-type Crepin test, had not been conducted for all staff involved in track operation, especially the transportation manager responsible for command duties, within the designated examination periods. The bureau instructed the company to reaffirm the importance of fitness examinations to management, establish a reliable system to ensure their consistent implementation, and thoroughly manage this process. The company is required to report on the measures taken by June 16, 2022.

Show original Japanese text

軌道運転規則第7条の2で規定された軌道の運転に係る作業を行う貴社の運輸部長に対して、貴社は同条に基づく適性検査を行っていないとの情報が当局に通報されたことから、貴社に対して、令和4年4月15日に保安監査を実施した。 その結果、下記のとおり改善を要する事項が認められたため、所要の措置を講ずるよう指示する。 なお、改善措置を講ずるにあたっては、背後要因を含めた原因を究明したうえで、再発防止に必要な改善策を策定すること。 講じた措置については、令和4年6月16日までに報告されたい。 記 1.軌道運転規則第7条の2に規定された適性検査については、貴社が規定した「運転関係従事員の適性検査及び身体検査規程」に基づき作業素質検査(内田式クレペリン検査)を軌道の運転に関係ある従事員全てに定期的に実施する必要があるにもかかわらず、指令業務等を行う運輸部長に対して検査期間内に行っていなかったことを確認した。 よって、管理者に適性検査の重要性を再認識させるとともに、作業素質検査を確実に実施する仕組みを構築し、その管理を徹底すること。 【北陸信越運輸局】

Business location and permit details

Business location address
富山県高岡市
Legal articles
軌道運転規則
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=33

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Low-medium

Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.

Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act.

Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Open original sources and verification detailsOfficial URL, direct PDF, and Kiroku archive
Original source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-05-14T21:30:23.843+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-05-14T21:30:23.843+00:00
Archive captured
2026-05-16T12:36:23.418761+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "612c2457-fddb-4a99-8205-dbe3cf12a138",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-wan-xie-xian-20220516",
    "company_name_original": "万葉線株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "鉄道事業法",
      "en": "Railway Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "行政指導",
      "en": "Administrative Guidance"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "",
      "en": ""
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 95,
    "method": "normalized_name_with_corporate_number",
    "method_label": "Normalized Japanese name matched to a company profile with Corporate Number",
    "notes": "Matched by normalized Japanese company name to an enriched company profile with a Corporate Number."
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Low-medium",
    "actionMeaning": "Administrative guidance or supervision was publicly disclosed by the authority.",
    "practicalNote": "Use as a monitoring signal. Confirm details before treating it as a formal sanction.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under Railway Business Act."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/tetsudo-jigyoho-wan-xie-xian-20220516",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=33",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/7d61e381b58bsfn2",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=tetudou&EID=search&no=33",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-05-16T12:36:23.418761+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-05-14T21:30:23.843+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-06T06:41:56.074+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-05-14T21:30:23.843+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-09-10T17:41:49.441Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.