Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 株式会社Sumika

株式会社Sumika (Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business ActHyogo PrefectureGovernment disclosure25 March 2024

Action type

Directive

Law

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act

Authority

Hyogo Prefecture

Action date

25 March 2024

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Hyogo Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Completed archive verified
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 10:26 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社Sumika

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社Sumika?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社SumikaJapanese only
Original: 株式会社Sumika
Governing law
Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act
宅地建物取引業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
25 March 2024
Issuing authority
Hyogo Prefecture
兵庫県
Industry context
宅建業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Sumika Corporation, registered under number兵庫県知事(1)第451611号 and based in Himeji City, Hyogo Prefecture, was instructed by Hyogo Prefecture on March 25, 2024, for violating Article 46, Paragraph 2 of the Real Estate Business Act. The violation involved collecting advertising fees from landlords under the guise of advertising costs, without providing detailed expense statements to tenants, despite having received the maximum brokerage fee from tenants for a rental property. This conduct contravenes the provisions of the Act.

Show original Japanese text

仲介を行った賃貸物件に関し、借主から媒介報酬の限度額を受領したにもかかわらず、別途、貸主に対して広告費用の明細を示さず、広告料の名目で費用を徴収した。このことは、法第46条第2項の規定に違反する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
兵庫県姫路市
Legal articles
宅地建物取引業法第65条第1項
Action period
-
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=takuti&EID=search&no=188

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Real-estate transaction law covering licensed real-estate brokers and related transaction duties.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.