Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 株式会社賃貸コンサルティング

株式会社賃貸コンサルティング (Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business ActMie PrefectureGovernment disclosure12 August 2021

Action type

Directive

Law

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act

Authority

Mie Prefecture

Action date

12 August 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Mie Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 10:36 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社賃貸コンサルティング

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社賃貸コンサルティング?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社賃貸コンサルティングJapanese only
Original: 株式会社賃貸コンサルティング
Governing law
Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act
宅地建物取引業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
12 August 2021
Issuing authority
Mie Prefecture
三重県
Industry context
宅建業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

The violation concerns Kabushiki Kaisha Chintai Consulting, registered under number Mie Prefecture (3) No. 3002, located in Yokkaichi City, Mie Prefecture. On February 3, 2021, the company mailed an important matter explanation document to a tenant for a rental property in Ise City, Mie Prefecture. The explanation of important matters was conducted by a dedicated transaction officer via telephone on February 7, 2021, without face-to-face communication. The Mie Prefectural government issued an instruction on August 12, 2021, as a regulatory action.

Show original Japanese text

被処分者は、三重県伊勢市内の賃貸物件の賃貸借の媒介について、賃借人に対して令和3年2月3日に郵送にて重要事項説明書を交付し、重要事項の説明は専任取引士が令和3年2月7日に電話にて行い、対面で行わせなかった。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
三重県四日市市
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=takuti&EID=search&no=5

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Real-estate transaction law covering licensed real-estate brokers and related transaction duties.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.