Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 株式会社クラシコ

株式会社クラシコ (Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business ActTokyo Metropolitan GovernmentGovernment disclosure28 March 2023

Action type

Directive

Law

Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act

Authority

Tokyo Metropolitan Government

Action date

28 March 2023

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation
Captured: Jul 13, 2026, 10:31 AM JST

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社クラシコ

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社クラシコ?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社クラシコJapanese only
Original: 株式会社クラシコ
Governing law
Building Lots and Buildings Transaction Business Act
宅地建物取引業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
28 March 2023
Issuing authority
Tokyo Metropolitan Government
東京都
Industry context
宅建業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Kurashiko Corporation, registered with the Tokyo Governor (registration number: Tokyo 3-93039), was instructed by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government on March 28, 2023, for violating the Real Estate Business Act. The violation involved not informing a buyer that they could cancel the contract under the Cooling-Off Law, thereby depriving the buyer of this opportunity and harming fair trading practices. The transaction took place in Shibuya, Tokyo.

Show original Japanese text

本件契約はクーリング・オフの適用がある取引であるにもかかわらず、買主が本件契約の解除を申し出た際に、買主にクーリング・オフによる解除が可能であることを案内せず、クーリング・オフによる解除の機会を失わせ、取引の公正を害した。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
東京都渋谷区
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=takuti&EID=search&no=77

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Real-estate transaction law covering licensed real-estate brokers and related transaction duties.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.