Possible 基準値超過 against ムラサキシメジ

{
  "record": {
    "id": "2f5fc4c1-a47a-4158-999c-204c5574ccca",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/other-murasakisimezi-unknown",
    "company_name_original": "ムラサキシメジ",
    "company_name_registry": "ムラサキシメジ",
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "放射性物質の規制に関する基準値超過",
      "en": "放射性物質の規制に関する基準値超過"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "基準値超過",
      "en": "基準値超過"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "厚生労働省",
      "en": "Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "possible",
    "confidence": 60,
    "method": "extracted_japanese_name",
    "method_label": "Company name extracted from the Japanese public disclosure",
    "notes": null
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "unreviewed",
    "label": "Machine extracted"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Context needed",
    "actionMeaning": "This is a public Japanese regulatory disclosure. The exact legal effect depends on the cited source and regulator.",
    "practicalNote": "Review the original Japanese source and determine relevance to your counterparty-risk workflow.",
    "lawContext": "Japanese regulatory disclosure under 放射性物質の規制に関する基準値超過."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/other-murasakisimezi-unknown",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/0000138762.html",
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/view/3d9ae4a11cdene8w",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-06-14T06:30:17.407+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-04-25T00:01:11.947+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-05-01T07:17:36.525+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-04-25T00:01:11.947+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-06-19T08:11:10.413Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}