Enforcement record

License Revocation disclosure naming 株式会社越後屋

株式会社越後屋 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActMiyagi PrefectureGovernment disclosure14 October 2022

Action type

License Revocation

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Miyagi Prefecture

Action date

14 October 2022

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Miyagi Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Not confirmed; shown under the published name
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Available sources and saved files are listed in the public documents section below.

Direct inquiry

Ask about this enforcement record

No account needed

Ask us to explain the record, verify the named legal entity, or scope a documented review.

Inquiry context: 株式会社越後屋

No phone number or account is required. We normally reply within two to three business days. Read our privacy policy.

English public-record screening

Need a documented check for 株式会社越後屋?

Get a structured English summary of the company identity and public records collected by RegBase, with source links, confirmation dates, and a clearly stated scope.

  • ✓ English and Japanese company identity
  • ✓ Enforcement and public-record summary
  • ✓ Official-source URLs and confirmation dates
  • ✓ PDF or CSV for an internal review file

This is not a credit report, safety guarantee, sanctions conclusion, legal opinion, or full due-diligence investigation.

No account required. The report opens immediately after Stripe confirms payment.

See sample screeningView pricingAsk a Japan-based researcher

Public documents and saved materials

View the original publications, see what was preserved, or download each file below.

Loading materials…

Need help interpreting these materials or confirming which legal entity they belong to? Ask RegBase about this company.

Action summary

Company
株式会社越後屋Japanese only
Original: 株式会社越後屋
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
License Revocation
許可取消
Action date
14 October 2022
Issuing authority
Miyagi Prefecture
宮城県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Echodaya Corporation's license was canceled by Miyagi Prefecture on October 14, 2022, because the company did not submit a notification regarding the location of its main office within 30 days after Miyagi Prefecture announced the notice (Public Notice No. 610, August 30, 2022). The company’s main office is located at 11-37 Kitahama 1-chome, Shiogama City, Miyagi Prefecture. The violation falls under Article 29-2, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

営業所の所在地を確知できず,宮城県告示第610号(令和4年8月30日)で公告したが同日から30日を経過しても申出がなかった。 このことは,建設業法第29条の2第1項に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
宮城県塩竈市北浜一丁目11-37
Representative
三井 孝一
Permit / registration number
宮城県知事(般-1)第21971号
Permitted business types
Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works
Legal articles
建設業法第29条の2第1項
Cause of action
営業所の所在地を確知できず,宮城県告示第610号(令和4年8月30日)で公告したが同日から30日を経過しても申出がなかった。 このことは,建設業法第29条の2第1項に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=721

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

High

A regulator revoked an authorization or license required for the covered activity.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the affected business line and whether the company can legally perform the contemplated service.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.