Action summary

Company

協和株式会社Japanese original

Original: 協和株式会社

Corporate Number: 9120901010754

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

8 December 2022

Issuing authority

Osaka Prefecture

大阪府

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

Kyowa Corporation was ordered by Osaka Prefecture on December 8, 2022, to ensure compliance with the Construction Business Act and related laws. The violations include placing a designated technical manager at construction sites in Aichi Prefecture and other sites in Chiba, Nagano, Miyagi, Saitama, and Kagoshima Prefectures, in breach of Article 15, Item 2, and Article 26, Paragraph 3 of the Act. These sites were not sufficiently close to the company's main office, making it impractical for the designated technical personnel to perform their duties exclusively at the office, thus violating the requirement that such personnel be dedicated full-time to the office. The company was instructed to take measures to prevent recurrence and to ensure proper business operations.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

大阪府高槻市郡家新町85番１号

Representative

野澤 重晴

Permit / registration number

大阪府知事（特－１）第152412号

Permitted business types

Civil engineering works, Pipe works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第１項柱書及び第２号

Cause of action

当該建設業者は、愛知県内の民間発注工事において、建設業法第15条第２号及び第26条第３項の規定に違反して、同号に規定する同社の営業所における専任の技術者を、専任を要する主任技術者として工事現場に配置した。 また、当該建設業者は、令和元年10月から令和３年３月までの間に請け負った工事現場の職務に従事しながら実質的に営業所の職務にも従事しうる程度には工事現場と営業所が近接していない千葉県、長野県、宮城県、埼玉県及び鹿児島県内の民間発注工事において、建設業法第15条第２号の規定に違反して、同号に規定する同社の営業所における専任の技術者を同法26条第１項に定める主任技術者として工事現場に配置した。このことにより、営業所における専任の技術者が、その営業所に常勤して専らその職務に従事すべきところ、一定期間、専任しているとは認めがたい状態にあった。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=753

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "ffbf83ca-21ec-49d5-b242-4bfd48f9e86b",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-xie-he-20221208",
    "company_name_original": "協和株式会社",
    "company_name_registry": "協和株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "9120901010754",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "大阪府",
      "en": "Osaka Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-xie-he-20221208",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=753",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T14:00:21.279+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:54:39.552+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-28T15:24:08.956Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.