Action summary

Company

株式会社チュウオJapanese original

Original: 株式会社チュウオ

Corporate Number: 7290801016531

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

20 December 2023

Issuing authority

Fukuoka Prefecture

福岡県

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

Chuo Co., Ltd. engaged in civil engineering work ordered by Kawasaki Town despite the expiration of its construction permit. The company also entered into contracts exceeding the scope of minor construction work as defined by Enforcement Order of the Construction Business Act, Article 1-2, Paragraph 1. Furthermore, it failed to continuously undergo management review as required by Article 27-23, Paragraph 1, and participated in bidding and contracted civil engineering work from Kawasaki Town during a period when it was not authorized to directly undertake such work, due to the lapse of its permit and review status. These actions violate Article 3, Paragraph 1, and Article 27-23, Paragraph 1, of the Construction Business Act, and fall under Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the same Act.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

福岡県福岡県田川郡川崎町大字田原506

Representative

西本 泰博

Permit / registration number

福岡県知事（般-3）第17441号

Permitted business types

Civil engineering works, Building works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第1項

Cause of action

株式会社チュウオは、川崎町発注の土木工事において、土木工事の許可が失効していたにもかかわらず、建設業法施行令第1条の2第1項に定める軽微な建設工事の範囲を超える請負契約を締結した。また、建設業法第27条の23第１項で規定する経営事項審査を継続して受審せず、同法施行令に定める建設工事を発注者から直接請け負うことができない期間が生じていたにもかかわらず、この間に川崎町が発注する土木工事の入札に参加し、請負契約を締結した。以上のことは、建設業法第3条第1項及び同法第27条の23第1項に違反する行為であり、同法第28条第1項第2号に該当する。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1066

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "fb5a9e49-a5c6-45fd-b0de-f43a90c4f46b",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-tiyuuo-20231220",
    "company_name_original": "株式会社チュウオ",
    "company_name_registry": "株式会社チュウオ",
    "corporate_number": "7290801016531",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "福岡県",
      "en": "Fukuoka Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-tiyuuo-20231220",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1066",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T16:10:24.475+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:48:55.916+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T12:54:31.155Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.