Enforcement record

Directive against 株式会社神通

株式会社神通 (Construction Business Act)

This page is one enforcement record linked to a confirmed legal entity. Company-level Official Gazette notices, registry data, related-company signals, and other public records are collected on the company profile.

View company profile
Construction Business ActToyama PrefectureConfirmed entity match26 December 2022

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Toyama Prefecture

Action date

26 December 2022

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence. Open the company profile for company-level registry, Official Gazette, and related-company context.

Source verification

Public-source and preservation status

Publishing authority
Toyama Prefecture
Official source URL
Recorded by RegBase
Entity match
Confirmed against the current entity-resolution policy
Kiroku preservation
Queued for preservation

“Confirmed” means that RegBase matched this record to the cited public disclosure or entity under the stated checks. It does not verify the truth of the disclosure or guarantee the entity’s current status, creditworthiness, or any legal conclusion.

Review the details and materials for this record to see the available official sources and preserved files before purchasing.

Save a record of your review

Keep the records and their sources together

Review what is included, then save the report and CSV in an evidence ZIP for internal sharing. Available source files vary by target.

See the included records, sources, and available files on the next page.

Action summary

Company
株式会社神通Japanese original
Original: 株式会社神通
Corporate Number: 5230001018360
Entity match
Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked
source_corporate_number_nta_current_name
国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました(source_corporate_number_nta_current_name)。
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
26 December 2022
Issuing authority
Toyama Prefecture
富山県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

In 2021, Kabushiki Kaisha Jintsu appointed persons without a direct and permanent employment relationship as chief engineers for the 'Awashima District Road Improvement No. 4' project commissioned by the Hokuriku Regional Development Bureau of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. This action violated Article 26, Paragraph 1 of the Construction Business Act and falls under Item 2 of Article 28, Paragraph 1 of the same law. The prefectural government of Toyama issued an instruction on December 26, 2022, requiring the company to take measures to prevent recurrence, including promptly informing staff of the violation and related sanctions, conducting training to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, investigating and reviewing operational procedures, and reporting on the implementation of these measures by December 26, 2023.

Show original Japanese text

株式会社神通は、令和3年に国土交通省北陸地方整備局富山河川国道事務所が発注した「粟島地区道路改良その4工事」において、直接的かつ恒常的な雇用関係にない者を主任技術者として設置していた。 このことが、法第26条第1項の規定に違反し、法第28条第1項第2号に該当するため。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
富山県滑川市清水町5番27号
Representative
室澤 稔彦
Permit / registration number
富山県知事許可(般-2)第16590号
Permitted business types
Civil engineering works, Building works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Paving works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項(同項第2号該当)
Cause of action
株式会社神通は、令和3年に国土交通省北陸地方整備局富山河川国道事務所が発注した「粟島地区道路改良その4工事」において、直接的かつ恒常的な雇用関係にない者を主任技術者として設置していた。 このことが、法第26条第1項の規定に違反し、法第28条第1項第2号に該当するため。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=767

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.