Action summary

Company

株式会社パセオJapanese original

Original: （株）パセオ

Corporate Number: 1460101001387

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

31 October 2025

Issuing authority

Hokkaido Prefecture

北海道

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

On September 2, 2024, at a construction site in Shimizu Town, Paseo Corporation had two workers perform pipe installation work in a trench approximately 4 meters deep. The company did not implement measures such as installing shoring to prevent soil collapse. As a result, the soil on the slope collapsed, burying both workers alive. One worker died and the other was injured. Consequently, the company was sentenced to a fine by the Obihiro Summary Court on August 26, 2025, for violations of Article 21, Paragraph 2 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act and Item 1 of Article 534 of the Labor Safety and Health Regulations. This incident falls under Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Construction Business Act.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

北海道帯広市西16条南6丁目15番21号

Representative

星久保 吉正

Permit / registration number

北海道知事許可（般－６）十第０３５１９号

Permitted business types

Civil engineering works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works

Legal articles

建設業法第２８条第１項（第２８条第１項第３号該当）

Cause of action

株式会社パセオは、令和６ 年９ 月２ 日に清水町内工事現場において、地上から 約４ メートル掘削した溝の中で、労働者２ 名に配管の設置作業を行わせるに当た り、土止め支保工を設ける等の地山の崩壊を防止するための措置を講じなかった ため、法面の土砂が崩壊して両者生き埋めになり、１ 名が死亡、外１ 名が負傷 した。 このことにより、労働安全衛生法第２ １ 条第２ 項及び労働安全衛生規則第534条 第１ 号違反により、帯広簡易裁判所において同社が罰金刑に処せられ、令和７ 年 ８ 月２ ６ 日にその刑が確定した。 このことは、建設業法第２ ８ 条第１ 項第３ 号に該当するものである。

Other notes

北海道労働局から建設業相互通報制度による通報

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1865

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "dbeabef1-27eb-48e1-a983-eb53a15d6386",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-paseo-20251031",
    "company_name_original": "（株）パセオ",
    "company_name_registry": "株式会社パセオ",
    "corporate_number": "1460101001387",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "北海道",
      "en": "Hokkaido Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-paseo-20251031",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1865",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-18T08:41:05.11+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-05-01T07:36:18.584+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-18T08:41:04.996+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T14:57:49.048Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.