Action summary

Company

今野産業Japanese only

Original: 今野産業

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

24 August 2023

Issuing authority

Miyagi Prefecture

宮城県

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

Konno Sangyo, located at 70 Yurae, Tsubomachi Ota, Ishinomaki City, Miyagi Prefecture, was instructed by Miyagi Prefecture under the Construction Business Act Article 28, Paragraph 1, to correct and submit the documents related to the past five fiscal years by September 29, 2023. The documents in question, prepared and submitted by an administrative scrivener under delegation, contained false information regarding construction work and contract amounts, which the company did not recognize as false at the time of submission. The company was also required to take measures to prevent recurrence, including promptly informing staff of the violation details and implementing ongoing training on legal compliance. A report on these measures is to be submitted in writing by October 31, 2023. The violation was due to the submission of documents with false information, knowingly or unknowingly, by the administrative scrivener delegated to prepare and submit them. The company holds a construction permit (No. Miyagi-ken Governor (Ban-) 16622) and is engaged in various types of construction work, including general construction, paving, water, and demolition.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

宮城県石巻市桃生町太田字閖前７０番地

Representative

今野 清昭

Permit / registration number

宮城県知事（般－4）第16622号

Permitted business types

Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Paving works, し, Water facilities works, Demolition works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第1項本文

Cause of action

行政書士にその作成及び提出を委任した法第１１条第２項に規定する書類に、当該行政書士が事実と異なる工事、請負金額等虚偽の内容を記載したことを認識しないまま、これを提出させた。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1234

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "e2e306b9-0102-4149-9ef1-1cad27306141",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jin-ye-chan-ye-20230824",
    "company_name_original": "今野産業",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "宮城県",
      "en": "Miyagi Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 65,
    "method": "loose_name_without_strong_address_evidence",
    "method_label": "loose_name_without_strong_address_evidence",
    "notes": "公表資料の名称は収録しましたが、法人番号へ安全に結び付ける独立証拠が不足しています。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-jin-ye-chan-ye-20230824",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1234",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T15:30:16.234+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:50:31.355+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-13T13:28:58.300Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.