Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 株式会社吉開工業

株式会社吉開工業 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActOsaka PrefectureGovernment disclosure14 February 2023

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Osaka Prefecture

Action date

14 February 2023

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming 株式会社吉開工業

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%A0%AA%E5%BC%8F%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE%E5%90%89%E9%96%8B%E5%B7%A5%E6%A5%AD&limit=10

Action summary

Company
株式会社吉開工業Japanese only
Original: 株式会社吉開工業
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
14 February 2023
Issuing authority
Osaka Prefecture
大阪府
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

On November 19, 2019, during a main pipe replacement construction in Shibashima 3-chome, Higashiyodogawa-ku, Osaka City, a worker from Yoshikai Kogyo Co., Ltd., performing gas pipe removal work, was injured when a road curb fell, resulting in fractures of both malleoli of the right ankle. The company's then-director failed to promptly report the worker's injury to the Yodogawa Labor Standards Inspection Office as required, and did not submit the worker injury report until February 22, 2023. As a result, the former director was fined 100,000 yen for violating the Industrial Safety and Health Act (Law No. 57 of 1972), with the penalty confirmed on September 2, 2022. The company was also fined 100,000 yen on the same date. The Osaka Prefectural Government issued an instruction based on Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Construction Business Act, requiring the company to comply with laws related to construction work and to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Show original Japanese text

令和元年11月19日、大阪市東淀川区柴島3丁目にて行われた、導管整備本支管入替工事において、本工事を施工する1次下請人である同社所属の労働者が、ガス管撤去に係る作業を行っていたところ、道路の縁石が落下し、右足関節両果骨折の負傷をしたが、当時の同社取締役は、淀川労働基準監督署長に対し、遅滞なく、労働者死傷病報告書を提出して報告しなければならないのに、これをせず、令和4年2月22日に至るまで、同署に労働者死傷病報告を提出しなかった。 このことで、同社の元取締役は、労働安全衛生法(昭和47年法律第57号)違反により、罰金10万円の刑に処せられ、令和4年9月2日にその刑が確定し、同社は、罰金10万円の刑に処せられ、同日にその刑が確定した。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
大阪府門真市垣内町14番6号
Representative
峰岡 宏行
Permit / registration number
大阪府知事(般-3)第156052号
Permitted business types
Pipe works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項第3号
Cause of action
令和元年11月19日、大阪市東淀川区柴島3丁目にて行われた、導管整備本支管入替工事において、本工事を施工する1次下請人である同社所属の労働者が、ガス管撤去に係る作業を行っていたところ、道路の縁石が落下し、右足関節両果骨折の負傷をしたが、当時の同社取締役は、淀川労働基準監督署長に対し、遅滞なく、労働者死傷病報告書を提出して報告しなければならないのに、これをせず、令和4年2月22日に至るまで、同署に労働者死傷病報告を提出しなかった。 このことで、同社の元取締役は、労働安全衛生法(昭和47年法律第57号)違反により、罰金10万円の刑に処せられ、令和4年9月2日にその刑が確定し、同社は、罰金10万円の刑に処せられ、同日にその刑が確定した。
Other notes
大阪労働局からの通報
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=823

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Osaka Prefecture source (Japanese)
Extracted at
2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-07-17T08:53:34.328+00:00
Archive captured
Not archived
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "f215ee3a-3485-46d8-bdf2-a2de7de6c118",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-ji-kai-gong-ye-20230214",
    "company_name_original": "株式会社吉開工業",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "大阪府",
      "en": "Osaka Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 0,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_name_mismatch",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_name_mismatch",
    "notes": "複数候補または識別情報の矛盾があるため、対象法人を確定していません(source_corporate_number_name_mismatch)。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "needs_review",
    "label": "Needs review"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-ji-kai-gong-ye-20230214",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=823",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T14:30:27.415+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:53:34.328+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-11T03:41:05.250Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.