Action summary

Company

富島総業株式会社Japanese original

Original: 富島総業(株)

Corporate Number: 7360002022470

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

1 July 2025

Issuing authority

Okinawa Prefecture

沖縄県

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

Toshima Sougyo Co., Ltd. was ordered to pay a fine of 200,000 yen (corporate) and 100,000 yen (individual) by the Taira Summary Court on January 7, Reiwa 7 (2025), for violating the Industrial Safety and Health Act. The violation occurred at a construction site in Miyakojima City on February 19, Reiwa 6 (2024), where the company, as a primary subcontractor responsible for scaffolding assembly, failed to implement measures to use fall prevention devices when assembling scaffolding structures over two meters high, thereby failing to prevent fall hazards for workers. This constitutes a violation under Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Act.

Business location and permit details

Business location address

沖縄県宮古島市平良字下里６６３－３

Representative

島尻 大吾

Permit / registration number

沖縄県知事許可（般-２）第008701号

Permitted business types

（一般）土, Building works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Stone works, Electrical works, Pipe works, Paving works, Water facilities works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第1項（同条第1項第３号該当）

Cause of action

富島総業（株）は、令和６年２月19日の宮古島市における工事現場において、「足場の組立て等を請け負う１次下請け事業者であるが、高さが２メートル以上の構造の足場の組立ての作業を行わせるに当たり、足場材の緊結、取り外し、受渡し等の作業にあっては、墜落による労働者の危険を防止するため、要求性能墜落制止用器具を使用させる措置を講じなければならないにもかかわらず、これを講じなかった」として、労働安全衛生法違反により令和７年１月７日、平良簡易裁判所より罰金20万円（法人）、罰金10万円（個人）の略式命令を受け、その刑が確定した。 このことが、法第28条第１項第３号に該当すると認められる。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1723

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "c494d782-eabd-4f15-b3cc-fc4898a1eaad",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-fu-dao-zong-ye-20250701",
    "company_name_original": "富島総業(株)",
    "company_name_registry": "富島総業株式会社",
    "corporate_number": "7360002022470",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "沖縄県",
      "en": "Okinawa Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-fu-dao-zong-ye-20250701",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1723",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-18T08:42:19.965+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-05-01T07:42:18.825+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-18T08:42:19.798+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T12:56:33.891Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.