Enforcement record

Directive disclosure naming 有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所

有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所 (Construction Business Act)

This page records one action from a Japanese government disclosure, including the published name, governing law, authority, action details, and official source.

Construction Business ActEhime PrefectureGovernment disclosure2 July 2021

Action type

Directive

Law

Construction Business Act

Authority

Ehime Prefecture

Action date

2 July 2021

Current page: Enforcement record

This screen focuses on one disclosed action: the published name, governing law, authority, facts, source status, and review evidence.

Free report

Save the disclosure record naming 有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所

Includes the published name, regulator, governing law, source links, archive status, and reviewer note fields for internal due-diligence files.

Preserved evidence by Kiroku

Review the preserved source for 有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所

Open the preserved public source with its capture time, original artifact, available verification data, and downloadable evidence pack.

Open preserved source and evidence pack
For developers: JSON integration details

You do not need this for normal browsing. Use it only when integrating this enforcement record into an internal tool or AI workflow.

/api/v1/enforcements?company=%E6%9C%89%E9%99%90%E4%BC%9A%E7%A4%BE%E3%80%80%E6%B8%A1%E9%83%A8%E9%9B%BB%E6%A9%9F%E6%B0%B4%E9%81%93%E5%B7%A5%E6%A5%AD%E6%89%80&limit=10

Action summary

Company
有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所Japanese only
Original: 有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所
Governing law
Construction Business Act
建設業法
Action type
Directive
指示
Action date
2 July 2021
Issuing authority
Ehime Prefecture
愛媛県
Industry context
建設業者

Violation

Machine-translated summary — verify against original

Watanabe Electric Waterworks conducted residential piping and new water supply connection work in November 2020 and March 2021 without obtaining approval from the Mayor of Imabari City. This was found to violate the Imabari City Water Supply Ordinance and related regulations. Consequently, on May 11, 2021, the company was suspended from being designated as a specified water supply equipment contractor by Imabari City, and on May 18, 2021, it was fined. This situation corresponds to Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Building Business Act.

Show original Japanese text

㈲渡部電機水道工業所は、令和2年11月及び令和3年3月に、今治市長の承認等を受けることなく、宅地配管工事及び新設給水引込み工事を施工した。このことが、今治市給水条例等に違反するとして、同市から令和3年5月11日付けで同市指定給水装置工事事業者の指定停止及び同月18日付けで過料の処分を受けた。 このことは、建設業法第28条第1項第3号に該当する。

Business location and permit details

Business location address
愛媛県今治市
Representative
渡部 克也
Permit / registration number
愛媛県知事(般-2)第10072号
Permitted business types
Civil engineering works, Electrical works, Pipe works, Water facilities works
Legal articles
建設業法第28条第1項
Cause of action
㈲渡部電機水道工業所は、令和2年11月及び令和3年3月に、今治市長の承認等を受けることなく、宅地配管工事及び新設給水引込み工事を施工した。このことが、今治市給水条例等に違反するとして、同市から令和3年5月11日付けで同市指定給水装置工事事業者の指定停止及び同月18日付けで過料の処分を受けた。 このことは、建設業法第28条第1項第3号に該当する。
Overview page
https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=223

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

Compliance context

Medium

A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.

Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work.

Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

Original Ehime Prefecture source (Japanese)Open preserved source and evidence pack
Extracted at
2026-04-25T20:36:34.971+00:00
Evidence checked
2026-04-25T20:36:34.971+00:00
Archive captured
2026-05-04T12:33:01.977217+00:00
Show audit JSON
{
  "record": {
    "id": "6d0ebbf4-430e-4779-87f2-fe460334125e",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-du-bu-dian-ji-shui-dao-gong-ye-suo-20210702",
    "company_name_original": "有限会社 渡部電機水道工業所",
    "company_name_registry": null,
    "corporate_number": null,
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "愛媛県",
      "en": "Ehime Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "unresolved",
    "confidence": 95,
    "method": "normalized_name_with_corporate_number",
    "method_label": "Normalized Japanese name matched to a company profile with Corporate Number",
    "notes": "Matched by normalized Japanese company name to an enriched company profile with a Corporate Number."
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-du-bu-dian-ji-shui-dao-gong-ye-suo-20210702",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=223",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": "https://kiroku.today/a/a9f0234bd9r6hmc1",
    "archivedSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=223",
    "archiveCapturedAt": "2026-05-04T12:33:01.977217+00:00",
    "extractedAt": "2026-04-25T20:36:34.971+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-05-01T09:11:07.612+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-04-25T20:36:34.971+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-28T20:17:49.840Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.