Action summary

Company

株式会社大手組Japanese original

Original: （株）大手組

Corporate Number: 3070001009840

Entity match

Confirmed entity match100/100Machine checked

source_corporate_number_nta_current_name

国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。

Governing law

Construction Business Act

建設業法

Action type

Directive

指示

Action date

22 January 2024

Issuing authority

Gunma Prefecture

群馬県

Industry context

建設業者

Violation

On June 30, 2023, (株)大手組 submitted a management review application attaching a forged specific autonomous inspection record for construction machinery. This constitutes a violation of Article 28, Paragraph 1, Item 2 of the Construction Business Act. The prefectural authority of Gunma issued an instruction requiring the company to promptly inform its staff of the incident and the disciplinary measures, to implement ongoing training to ensure compliance with relevant laws, and to report in writing the measures taken. The company’s main office is located at 1-2-31 Nakashuku, Annaka City, Gunma Prefecture. The violation was based on the submission of a forged inspection record during the management review, which is a breach of the Construction Business Act. The company holds a construction business permit (Permit No. Gunma Prefecture Governor (Toku-4) No. 274).

Business location and permit details

Business location address

群馬県安中市中宿１-2-31

Representative

大手 一信

Permit / registration number

群馬県知事（特-4）第274号

Permitted business types

Civil engineering works, Scaffolding, earthwork, and concrete works, Paving works, Landscaping works, Water facilities works, Demolition works

Legal articles

建設業法第28条第1項（第1項第2号該当）

Cause of action

株式会社大手組は、令和５年６月３０日を審査基準日とする経営事項審査において、偽造した建設機械の特定自主検査記録表を添付し、虚偽の申請を行った。 このことが建設業法第２８条第１項第２号に該当する。

Overview page

https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1437

These fields are extracted from the original Japanese disclosure or linked overview pages when available.

This context is an operational aid for review workflows, not a credit opinion or legal conclusion.

Evidence pack

{
  "record": {
    "id": "5ee2ce46-48a1-444a-a419-8296619a052a",
    "url": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-da-shou-zu-20240122",
    "company_name_original": "（株）大手組",
    "company_name_registry": "株式会社大手組",
    "corporate_number": "3070001009840",
    "law": {
      "ja": "建設業法",
      "en": "Construction Business Act"
    },
    "action_type": {
      "ja": "指示",
      "en": "Directive"
    },
    "authority": {
      "ja": "群馬県",
      "en": "Gunma Prefecture"
    }
  },
  "entity_match": {
    "status": "confirmed",
    "confidence": 100,
    "method": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "method_label": "source_corporate_number_nta_current_name",
    "notes": "国税庁法人番号データとの独立照合で対象法人を確認しました（source_corporate_number_nta_current_name）。"
  },
  "review": {
    "status": "machine_reviewed",
    "label": "Machine checked"
  },
  "compliance_context": {
    "severity": "Medium",
    "actionMeaning": "A regulator issued a directive requiring specified action.",
    "practicalNote": "Verify the required action and whether the company has disclosed remediation or completion.",
    "lawContext": "Construction business law covering licensing, contractor obligations, and public-interest rules for construction work."
  },
  "evidence": {
    "recordUrl": "https://regbase.jp/en/enforcement/kensetsu-gyoho-da-shou-zu-20240122",
    "officialSourceUrl": "https://www.mlit.go.jp/nega-inf/cgi-bin/search.cgi?jigyoubunya=kensetugyousya&EID=search&no=1437",
    "officialDocumentUrl": null,
    "archiveUrl": null,
    "archivedSourceUrl": null,
    "archiveCapturedAt": null,
    "extractedAt": "2026-07-17T11:56:25.97+00:00",
    "translatedAt": "2026-07-18T16:20:21.631+00:00",
    "evidenceCheckedAt": "2026-07-17T08:48:35.611+00:00",
    "generatedAt": "2026-07-24T16:16:10.982Z"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "RegBase aggregates public Japanese government disclosures and does not provide a credit opinion.",
    "English summaries are provided for reference. The original Japanese source is authoritative.",
    "Possible or unresolved entity matches should be manually verified before use in a decision."
  ]
}

The original Japanese disclosure is the authoritative record. Use possible or unresolved matches only as leads for manual review.